Whitehorse Daily Star

Nominee program failings exposed again ( Analysis )

As a supposed “fast-track” to permanent residence,

By Freelancer on November 21, 2014

As a supposed “fast-track” to permanent residence, the Yukon’s nominee program is failing to deliver for those candidates who find themselves the unwilling victims of some of the territory’s less scrupulous employers.

As a result of an independent investigation commissioned this past summer by the nominees office, part of the Yukon government’s advanced education branch, the program has overseen the wrongful termination of several employees who have found themselves the unwilling victims of Tags Food and Gas in Whitehorse.

“Wrongful” in the sense as defined within the Yukon Employment Standards Act and elsewhere.

The employer was also subject to two ex-employees’ allegations of under-remuneration in June 2012.

They effectively accused the employer of the “clawback” of their hourly wage, subsequently subject to an employment standards office investigation and found to be true, with a “net underpayment” to the tune of “a few hundred dollars,” in the own words of the employer, Pret Sidhu.

Yukon NDP MLA Lois Moorcroft recently reiterated that “We then raised the issue with the minister at the time (Scott Kent), and specifically the need for an audit.”

An audit was deemed “unnecessary” back in 2012.

The same employer was suspended from the nominee program this past summer as a direct consequence of demands placed upon other employees.

These demands formed the core of a separate investigation during the summer at the instigation of the investigations unit.

Last May, Mark Hill, the then-communications director, confirmed that “a written requirement by the employer for a nominee to provide letters/call promoting the employer may also be illegal and unenforceable.”

The specific demands, placed as a precondition of the employer’s continued sponsorship, were also later found to be illegal and in contravention of Section 50 of the Employment Standards Act.

At least two employees, both of whom were included within the summer investigation, were forced off the process of application for permanent residence. In at least one case, their application was later refused by Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) as a direct consequence.

An employer’s offence of this nature, found to be contrary to the act (2002), can carry a fine of between $500 and $10,000.

Furthermore, according to Hill, “If we find the employer is engaged in illegal conduct relating to (temporary foreign workers) or nominees, we will ban them from participating in the program for up to three years.”

Permanent residence applicants are effectively contractually tied to an employer through the program’s tri-partite agreement memorandum.

However, they are legally allowed to continue employment during the period of an expired work permit by virtue of them being granted “implied status” during the period of their permit renewal.

It also protects the employer and allows them to continue sponsorship – a fact unknown or unrecognized by Tags Food and Gas management.

Premature and wrongful termination forces the employee to return to square one on the process of their seeking permanent residence.

That process involves the re-submission of documents covering medical and police clearances from both here in Canada and their country of origin, as well as the considerable time and expense of translation, notarization and recorded delivery to CIC offices on the east coast.

On a minimum wage, this is not an insignificant expense.

Since the program’s inception in 2006, limited statistics have been produced on its take-up other than a 2010 document listing 388 employees who have worked with 124 employers, mostly to mutual benefit in the Yukon.

Formal requests for more accurate statistics for the most recent four years were not acknowledged by the nominees office this month.

The program is quite separate from the problematic Temporary Foreign Worker program here and elsewhere in the west.

It’s also different from the business class nominee application processes administered in Prince Edward Island in 2008.

In that scenario, tens of thousands of dollars were to be invested in active business interests (in which the immigrating investors were disallowed an active role in the business, causing significant “reputational damage to Canada,” in the words of then-Immigration minister Jason Kenney).

It clearly does, however, fall short in other key areas, consistently to the detriment of the would-be immigrant class who make up a key and core component of the territory’s workforce.

These are economic class migrants without tens of thousands of dollars to invest. They may be “critical impact workers”, but they figure far lower on the scale of value-addition when illegal sponsorship issues arise, as they have here in recent months.

The NDP’s Moorcroft adds that “We have a responsibility to these people, to avoid exploitation of economic class immigrants, and this demonstrates the need for an audit more than ever.”

In the two years since Tags was subjected to their first investigation, one of their longstanding employees, Ryan Pataray, has written to media here that he “saw a lot of transition” in his workplace.

He was one of six employees (two of whom have subsequently left the workplace) who visited CBC Yukon’s offices this past summer to try to set the record straight from two years ago. The CBC has yet to broadcast the requested “balance”.

Another ex-employee was later described as “one of the best employees we have ever had” by the employer in question here, routinely delivering half an hour of unpaid overtime with each and every shift; an exemplary employee acknowledged in that they “never once called in sick.”

They find themselves cast aside by Canada, as their wrongful removal from the nominee program resulted in an immediate cancellation of their permanent residence application (a process without any right of appeal) as “they are deemed to be in violation of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act,” according to CIC media spokesperson Sonia Lesage.

Yukon NDP MLA spokeswoman Kate White says, “I find this shocking and appalling.”

It also raises the question of just who the Immigration Act in question actually serves to “protect.”

Tags’ Sidhu was provided with the opportunity to respond to the general and specific issues described here, but declined to do so.

The current program is mis-administered to the extent that, in the case of the Yukon this year alone, more than one employee, fired for apparently legitimate reasons, was later rewarded with full permanent residence on the grounds that the employer in question simply failed to report the firing.

There are several cases of nominees returning to their home countries before completion of their terms of service, to be advised that their applications have been successful.

The Yukon program is also being undermined by core issues impacted by its final administration by federal departments which are issuing the new bridging open work permits.

Their function is to tide over (to “bridge”) the passage of PR applicants such as those here in the territory who are legally obligated to seek new employers during transitions enforced by offending employers such as Tags.

Issued at cost by the federal immigration office, the work visa (specific to the Yukon Territory to avoid the risk of losing the employee to another jurisdiction) was described as “garbage” by Marius Curtenau, the immigration manager for the Yukon.

The future begins to look dark for all parties, not least the victimized employees, in view of the fact that the Department of Education here “is due to play a larger role in federal-territorial integration” in the future, according to the ombudsman’s office here in Whitehorse.

In the short term, the NDP is calling for fairness and the introduction of a means in which applicants for permanent residence have recourse to a process whereby they can formally appeal such transparent injustices (and impending deportation orders).

There is an immediate need for oversight and advocacy.

In the words of one of the victims of the system failures this year in the territory, “I just don’t want it to happen to anyone else.”

There is nothing at present to stop it.

Peter Ion is a Yukon-based science writer and researcher.

By Peter Ion
Special to the Star

Comments (9)

Up 2 Down 0

LoveYukon on Nov 28, 2014 at 3:36 pm

Immigration nominee program was made to help people. On the other hand, some employers are taking advantage of employees under the nominee program. Tags is always famous for these kind of things. Underpayment, not paying overtime, no vacation fees, etc., etc., and as I heard from so many people it's a big headache working in tags. I remember that Filipino case. These kind of things should change or government should take some action.

Up 1 Down 0

liam on Nov 28, 2014 at 1:41 pm

bobby bitman - your comment is well put and balanced. As for your query about the 'thinking process' at Tags , well , need we even ask? I see no thinking whatsoever. Tags is just about cash from gas sales and to hell with everything else. One look at the employees faces and you need look no further.

Up 2 Down 1

anthonyG on Nov 28, 2014 at 10:24 am

Time for the Education Dept to take a collective sick-leave for all eternity, and for some new blood to pull the place into shape. Hundred bucks says that Friday morning in the Govt office today , and at least 50% of the drones are on 'sick leave' ( shopping for bargains on Black Friday ). If you are a parent of school-age kids in the Yukon, get them out of the Territory before its too late. They will thank you for it later, trust me.

Up 2 Down 0

bobbybitman on Nov 27, 2014 at 5:37 pm

The administration of the Nominee Program can be extra challenging I think, because you are dealing with people's lives, a lot is at stake and the employer has a lot more responsibilities toward the NP employee than your typical employer, employee relationship would have. A decent human being of an employer would be mindful of how vulnerable their NP employee is, and would do their best to see that person through unless there was a case of ongoing wilful disservice by the employee. I cannot comprehend what the thinking process would be at Tags to take advantage of these people by demanding kickbacks and expecting unpaid overtime. Sorry but it makes me wonder.

Up 2 Down 2

debra on Nov 27, 2014 at 12:18 pm

I've been using A&W for years. Longest I ever waited was about 3 minutes. And they give free coffee refills every time , so you take the rough with the smooth. Adios! (or order in Tagalog for a change and see how fast you get served ).

Up 3 Down 1

Yukoner3 on Nov 27, 2014 at 12:13 pm

Yukoner2 - your story sounds like BS to me. Nobody in their right mind sits waiting at the drive-thru for 15 minutes. I don't believe you. You are also totally out of line on the language stuff you ranted about. Bottom line is some canadians just like to pick arguments based on others having less language ability. Also, if you could get Yukoners as articulate and educated as you to fill those positions then the program would not exist. Guess what? No canadians ever apply for these jobs, partly because they end up working for individuals who take advantage and screw their staff out of their wages. Take a wider view Yukoner2 and know your facts better.

Up 15 Down 4

Yukoner 2 on Nov 27, 2014 at 7:55 am

I would like to see the whole program end. All it has done is bring standards down. I sat in the A&W drive through yesterday, the women says order when your ready. So I do, then there is a long silence and she asks me two more times to order. Then when I get to the window, she hadn't got my order and asked what I wanted again so after waiting 15 min. I drove off with nothing. if you want to come to this country and work then learn the language before you get here, and I'm not talking tourist I'm talking about coming here to work. I can't go to another country and expect to get a job if I can't speak their language, only in north America.

Up 100 Down 92

debbie on Nov 23, 2014 at 11:57 am

I remember the Philipino case a couple years ago. How the hell did this place ever get allowed to hire people on the nominee system again? I remember tags in Watson, they used to have great donuts and heavy breakfasts.

Up 104 Down 94

sunshine on Nov 21, 2014 at 7:42 pm

Yet more evidence of incompetence at the Education Department. And why are we not surprised any more? First its Trask and Royle, now its the folks at the Nominee Office. Will this ever end? And seriously, is anyone surprised any more by Tags misdemeanours? I thought the place had burnt down years ago anyway.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.