Photo by Whitehorse Star
Erica Beasley, Jim Gilpin and John Streicker
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Erica Beasley, Jim Gilpin and John Streicker
Zoning changes in the Hillcrest neighbourhood could prevent homeowners from doing any major roofing repairs if their house is more than nine metres tall.
Zoning changes in the Hillcrest neighbourhood could prevent
homeowners from doing any major roofing repairs if their house is more than nine metres tall.
At Monday's council meeting, Coun. John Streicker confirmed with planning staff that if council approves the zoning changes that were outlined in the Hillcrest Neighbourhood Plan, major repairs to roofs that are more than nine metres high would not be allowed.
Minor repairs such as patching is about all that could be done, planning manager Pat Ross said.
As he noted, putting properties into non-conforming zoning basically freezes the property to the zoning it has in place.
However, any major alterations must conform to the new zoning requirements. If 75 per cent or more of the building is damaged by fire, it must be rebuilt to the newer zoning regulations.
In this case, two buildings that are more than nine metres in the neighbourhood would be affected by the change, though several other structures would be put into non-conformance in other ways.
"Several Hillcrest properties would be placed into non-conformance as a result of the proposed zoning amendments,” city planner Erica Beasley stated in her report to council.
"While the new requirements would apply largely to the ‘new development' scenarios, some implications of non-conformance relate to the city's issuance of development and building permits for significant modifications/renovations to non-conforming properties.”
Among the changes, Residential Single-zoned properties would decrease from a 10-metre height limit to eight metres in the Steelox duplex area and nine metres in other areas.
Rooflines would need to start at six metres in the Steelox area and seven metres in other areas, with second-storey floor caps at 3.5 metres in the Steelox area and 4.5 metres in other areas.
There are also proposed regulations around landscaping, roof design and building facades.
All driveways would require hard surfacing and "internal sidewalks” would be required for all single and duplex housing in the neighbourhood.
The requirement, Beasley explained when questioned by Coun. Mike Gladish, is part of the city's efforts to encourage improvements to properties for more manicured developments that are aesthetically pleasing to pedestrians and others in the area.
More stringent requirements would also be in place for multi-family developments, including density restrictions of 35 units per hectare, a four-metre front yard setback, site coverage of 45 per cent or 55 per cent where there is a terraced amenity and materials, and trim and colour restrictions would have to be met for building facades.
As Beasley summed up in her report: "Two changes would occur in terms of allowable uses for the RM (Residential Multiple) sites.
"If amended to RCM (Comprehensive Residential Multiple Family), supportive housing would be a potential conditional use on the subject lots and child care centres would change from being an allowable principal use to being a conditional use.”
The zoning changes are part of the work to implement the Hillcrest Neighbourhood Plan, along with changes to the speed limits in the area (see separate story below).
Hillcrest Community Association president Jim Gilpin was at last night's meeting.
He praised the city's efforts in working with residents to both come up with a plan and implement the changes coming from it. However, he also stressed the need for more consultation on planned improvements to the neighbourhood's infrastructure.
"There's a lot of work to be done yet,” Gilpin said.
While he appreciates the workload being faced by the city's engineering department, he said, for there to be a successful vote on the Local Improvement Charge that will be posed to benefitting property owners, "a lot of consultation” is needed first.
Gilpin also stated his surprise that there are homes higher than nine metres, noting he would be happy to measure them himself to confirm if any exceed that height.
While the city's engineering department continues to work on the planned upgrades to infrastructure in the neighbourhood, council will consider the zoning changes over the next week prior to voting on first reading.
If first reading goes ahead, a public hearing on the amendments would be held at council's April 7 meeting with a report on the input coming forward on April 14 before council votes on second and third readings at its April 22 meeting.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (5)
Up 7 Down 2
Pro-science Greenie on Mar 6, 2014 at 1:08 am
Aesthetically pleasing? With a few pleasant exceptions in older parts of town, the only aesthetically pleasing part of Whitehorse are the old homes below the clay cliffs. Everything else pretty much looks like a random sub-division from an Outside city.
Up 9 Down 7
Northern Free Thinker on Mar 4, 2014 at 4:30 pm
"The requirement, Beasley explained when questioned by Coun. Mike Gladish, is part of the city's efforts to encourage improvements to properties for more manicured developments that are aesthetically pleasing to pedestrians and others in the area."
This is so misguided and ridiculous it is embarrassing. Also, hard-surfacing is extremely detrimental to ecology, preventing natural water cycles. LET THE EARTH BREATH!
Up 16 Down 1
Just Say'in on Mar 4, 2014 at 2:15 pm
Hillcrest…. the most high maintenance community in all of Whitehorse. All worried about the infrastructure, ascetics, and a whole bunch of things that are none of their business. Why are they even being pandered too. Maybe the city should just condemn most of those houses up there and then end of problem. Careful what you wish for Hillcrest, before you know it you will be required to conform to all of the rules that you think everyone else should.
Up 15 Down 2
north_of_60 on Mar 4, 2014 at 9:40 am
The CoW has yet to justify the need for these intrusive regulations. More accountability is needed.
Were these silly roof height regulations dreamt up by the same people responsible for the poorly designed traffic circles and the Whistle Bend fiasco?
Existing buildings should be exempt from any new zoning, unless significant alterations are made.
Up 15 Down 2
Yukoner 2 on Mar 4, 2014 at 9:29 am
What the f#$% is wrong with this city and the nimby crowd. So I need a new shingles but can't have them.