Whitehorse Daily Star

Zoning change would affect Old Town's character

City planning staff are proposing a major shift in the allowable residential density in the old part of downtown.

By Chuck Tobin on March 22, 2012

City planning staff are proposing a major shift in the allowable residential density in the old part of downtown.

The proposal will be considered by city council this evening as part of the zoning bylaw review.

The proposal calls for increasing the standard zoning from single-family residential to allow multiple housing with a cap of four units per lot.

Planning staff presented the proposal Tuesday evening at a public meeting held to gather more input on the type of housing that should be enabled in the Old Town.

The initial meeting was held in mid-February, and from that meeting, planning staff returned with a set of refined proposals that included the increase in allowable density.

The whole discussion was prompted by two multi-housing developments which recently received special permission from city council to proceed.

Following the approval, however, Coun. Kirk Cameron called for a moratorium on any more conditional use applications.

Council needed time, he insisted, to glean a better understanding of what Old Town residents wanted for their neighbourhood, which is zoned to allow for single-family and duplex developments.

Cameron said entertaining individual applications for special permission to build larger multi-housing projects was an emotional and divisive affair for local residents.

City council has approved nine multi-housing developments in the Old Town since 2000.

Those include the two projects approved in early February and the tri-plex on Wheeler Street completed by Habitat for Humanity a year ago.

The plan for the Old Town, described as the area between Sixth Avenue and the clay cliffs, and Wood Street to Ogilvie Street, does express a preference for maintaining the single-family character of the neighbourhood.

The Official Community Plan, on the other hand, allows for larger multi-unit developments through a conditional use application, and the plan does encourage increased density in existing neighbourhoods.

Other proposals brought forward by planning staff Tuesday included a reduction in the allowable building height from 10 to eight metres, while raising the portion of the lot which can be covered by buildings from 45 to 50 per cent.

It's recommended that any developments above one storey would have to be tiered, to avoid the square-box appearance while reducing the amount of shading for the neighbour.

Parking for new housing should be provided at the rear through lane-way access, it is being proposed.

Staff are suggesting that consolidating two lots to allow for projects larger than four units – as was the case with the recent approval for the eight-plex on Ogilvie – should not be allowed.

City planner Ben Campbell told those in attendance Tuesday that the city is experiencing significant growth.

It will take everything in the bank to keep up with the growth, he added: the new Whistle Bend subdivision, all of its options for infilling vacant areas in existing subdivisions, and boosting residential density where possible.

Feedback from residents at Tuesday's meeting varied.

Pushing parking to the rear not only heightens the security risk from those who like to lurk in back alleys, but it would also remove the neighbourly contact that comes from being beside each other in the front yard, it was said.

Some liked raising the allowable density to four units per lots. Others didn't.

And some thought there should be a limit on the number of four-unit developments allowed on each block, perhaps one or two for every block.

Shortening the allowable distance from the house to the street from 4.6 metres to two metres would box in existing homes that are already back 4.6 metres from the street, it was said.

City council is scheduled this evening to get its first look at the new draft zoning bylaw which will contain recommendations from staff for housing in the Old Town and a number of other proposed changes.

It's expected, for instance, to address last summer's public debate around backyard chicken coops in urban subdivisions, and whether the law should be changed to allow them.

Planning manager Mike Gau told Tuesday's audience the draft bylaw will be out next week to begin a month-long period of review by Whitehorse residents.

The process to approve the bylaw in its final form also includes a period for public review and a formal public hearing before city council.

The intent is to have the new zoning bylaw in place by the end of June, according to planning staff.

Comments (4)

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Mar 28, 2012 at 12:20 pm

I own a place downtown and thought that the proposal cobbled together by Jeff after the first meeting, and presented to City Council, was a good one. It seemed to re-arrange things so that the effect on the neighbours would be the same as the current rules, or even less, but so it would also allow more density. It was not as scary as I thought, and I actually thought it would increase my property value should I ever sell. My main concern was that it should not DECREASE the enjoyment and value of my property. I suppose higher density would decrease property values downtown in the long run, supply and demand and all that, but really the suggestions did not turn me off. I thought they were creative and pretty good. (laneway housing etc.)

Up 0 Down 0

Brenda Barnes on Mar 27, 2012 at 2:36 am

Thanks Mike Hawk for dumping on the beautiful neighborhood I've lived in for 16 of the 18 years I've been in Whitehorse. Just because you wouldn't live there doesn't mean others would not deliberately choose and love it. With one of the largest civic footprints in Canada, why should one neighborhood, already designated through the OCP to have a certain density and mil rate, be unilaterally sacrificed to ameliorate the manufactured housing "crisis"? Instead of talking about what kinds of density are acceptable to usurp the OCP, I think we should be talking about whether it should be usurped at all.

Up 0 Down 0

Mike Hawk on Mar 23, 2012 at 1:38 pm

Downtown is a dump! Building affordable housing here will be a godsend!

Up 0 Down 0

Fran Curran on Mar 22, 2012 at 4:35 pm

If a housing footprint can cover 50% of the lot and then parking is to be via the back lane into the housing lot, where is there room for green space, garden, childrens' plan space, a deck etc?

Won't the majority of the lot be used up? One of the charms of Old Town is the gardens and green spaces surrounding the single family homes.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.