Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Minister of Highways and Public Works Scott Kent

Yukoners ‘generally in favour’ of corridor plan

The difference of opinion is small in the case of Yukoners’ perspectives on the territorial government’s proposed Alaska Highway upgrades to the Whitehorse corridor.

By Aimee O'Connor on November 2, 2015

The difference of opinion is small in the case of Yukoners’ perspectives on the territorial government’s proposed Alaska Highway upgrades to the Whitehorse corridor.

The government released its report last week, summarizing the responses from 60 days of public consultation earlier this year.

While the report, prepared by engineering firm CH2M Hill, states that Yukoners are “generally in favour” of the $200-million highway plans, it’s not by much.

Forty-five per cent of respondents agreed that the initiative balances local and regional transportation needs, while 39 per cent disagreed.

The remaining 16 per cent either didn’t answer the question or were unsure.

A majority of survey respondents supported the idea of enhancing the multi-use trail near the airport and improving highways for cyclists and pedestrians.

In terms of whether the project will address congestion and travel times on the highway, the vote was split – 40 per cent agreeing, and 40 per cent disagreeing.

“Many respondents are of the view that congestion and travel times are not an issue on the Whitehorse Corridor,” the report states.

“Several respondents expressed concern about whether the proposed $200-million investment in highway improvements is justified.”

The 40-kilometre corridor was divided into 10 sections, each ranked by priority.

The sections start south of the Klondike Highway turnoff to Carcross, run through Whitehorse and end just north of the turnoff to Dawson City.

The sections identified as “immediate” priority start at Lobird Road, near Robert Service Way (formerly the South Access Road), and run through past the Erik Nielsen Whitehorse International Airport and end just north of Two Mile Hill Road.

These sections are estimated to cost $52 million and be completed in the next five years.

“There are divergent views on what, if any, improvements should be undertaken, with perspectives usually depending on the circumstances faced by a particular landowner,” the report states.

The proposal suggests widening the Alaska Highway to four lanes along some stretches, adding passing lanes, improving intersections and enhancing use of the multi-use trail near the airport.

In the immediate-priority sections, several business owners near the airport expressed concern earlier this year at the prospect of widening the highway.

The government held 37 one-on-one meetings with landowners whose land could be directly impacted by the changes as well as stakeholders who requested a meeting.

“Area business owners are opposed to the plan and say it’s too much, too complicated and too costly,” Lois Moorcroft, the NDP’s Highways and Public Works critic, said in the legislature earlier this year.

“They think the $202-million plan responds to a problem that doesn’t exist.”

The What We Heard document on the Yukon government’s website already has more than 2,000 views – while only 488 survey submissions and 62 email submissions were received to comprise the report.

“The Yukon government heard from Yukoners and will now use that feedback to refine the draft plan,” said Scott Kent, the minister of Highways and Public Works.

Kent said in a statement last week that no road work will be undertaken until the project is “re-prioritized” and further engagement with some stakeholders has taken place – unless it is work that was deemed necessary due to safety concerns.

It is unclear from the What We Heard document which aspects may have been deemed “necessary” to safety.

The minister was unavailable to comment before today’s press deadline.

Preliminary work on the Whitehorse corridor began in 2011 with a number of Yukon government studies on road safety, environment and highway capacity.

The goal of the highway upgrade is to address issues around safety and traffic congestions in the midst of a rising Whitehorse population – now close to 28,000 – of 24 per cent over the last decade.

Comments (8)

Up 7 Down 15

June Jackson on Nov 5, 2015 at 10:50 am

JC point taken. And that is why these forums are so good.. everyone gets to put out their point of view. You are certainly right when considering the cost.. it will escalate. I still don't think we need it, especially if businesses have to shut down.. how many jobs involved? Actually.. I know 4 now who support this project. All of them posted here.

Up 16 Down 7

Joel on Nov 4, 2015 at 4:21 pm

I am generally in favor of the plan to modernize at least the portion of the highway where the most usage occurs. I also think the creation of multi-use paths along the corridor make sense so other users can travel safely, not just vehicles.

Up 23 Down 8

JC on Nov 4, 2015 at 1:44 pm

Would you present your evidence for your claim that most Yukoners don't agree with the plan. And June, you know one now. So, lets just get on with it before the cost goes up to 400 million bucks.

Up 15 Down 28

June Jackson on Nov 4, 2015 at 11:07 am

I don't know of anyone that is in favor of the plan. Lots of angst last year when the highway was shut down in pieces at peak traffic hours to do... what? nothing. Someone said it was not even the right surfacing for the road and would have to be done over. What's it going to be like when they try to put 8 lanes in there?

Another waste of money by this government.

Up 32 Down 10

Curious Yukoner on Nov 4, 2015 at 8:21 am

A good project in my opinion.....but as is so typical in this Territory one or two people (or businesses in this case) whine to the politicians and the brakes are put on the project............what about the 35k other Yukoners and countless other travellers that would benefit from the project?
One business has a legitimate right to use the right of way in question but must vacate with two years notice...... the other simply uses the right of way as his personal property and we allow the Minister to stall the project..... time to grow a pair Mr. Kent!

Up 26 Down 11

This is very meaningful work to the City, Yukon and Alaska on Nov 3, 2015 at 12:37 pm

It is too bad the NDP could not do or say something meaningful for Yukoners. All negative.

Up 19 Down 24

Mark S on Nov 3, 2015 at 11:16 am

The driving bad practices here will have to be intensely monitored.
Why not lower the speed limited to 80km/hr monitored by cameras?

Up 22 Down 36

north_of_60 on Nov 2, 2015 at 5:54 pm

No, most Yukoners generally don't agree with the plan. As usual, the govt is trying to spin it otherwise. There are far more critical needs for road upgrades in the territory, and it's ridiculous wasting resources on a few miles of 'showpiece superhighway' just to impress visitors to Whitehorse.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.