Photo by Whitehorse Star
OFF TO THE SUMMIT – John Streicker, the federal Green Party president, will travel to Durban next week for the United Nations Climate Change Conference.
Photo by Whitehorse Star
OFF TO THE SUMMIT – John Streicker, the federal Green Party president, will travel to Durban next week for the United Nations Climate Change Conference.
Canada has a shoddy reputation at the annual climate change summits,
Canada has a shoddy reputation at the annual climate change summits, according to John Streicker, the newly-elected president of the federal Green Party.
Streicker will travel to Durban, South Africa, next week with Green Party Leader and MP Elizabeth May to attend this year's United Nations (UN) Climate Change Summit.
He talked to the Star Thursday about his expectations and what role Canada plays in reducing global carbon emissions.
"Canadian governments have not been trying to negotiate in good faith— we're actually disrupting the negotiations,” Streicker said.
In fact, he continued, we've won what's called the "colossal fossil award” for four years in a row.
The award is voted on by more than 500 international organizations, and given to the country which has done the most to disrupt or undermine climate negotiations.
"We don't want to invest in this,” he said, speaking of the global emission targets.
"We're a fossil fuel-producing country.”
But it's not as simple as just that, he explained.
It is incredibly difficult for any country to change energy economies.
Participating countries in this year's conference hope to figure out what to do after the Kyoto Protocol's period ends in 2012.
Canada signed the protocol in 2002 with a goal of reducing carbon emissions by six per cent below 1990 levels in a five-year period between 2008 and 2012.
As of 2008, Canada's emissions had risen 24 per cent above 1990 levels.
That means we're 30 per cent over our Kyoto target, he said.
"We didn't put a plan in place.”
Since then, he continued, we've switched our baseline year and target emissions twice in order to reach the country's goal.
But the results are simple to read, said Streicker.
"We won't have met our Kyoto targets by 2012.”
All we've been doing, Streicker continued, is shifting our baseline and shifting our targets, and we still don't have a plan in place.
So what to do?
Streicker quoted Fatih Birol, the chief economist from the International Energy Agency which just released its annual World Energy Outlook.
"There is a need for an international legally binding agreement to put a price on carbon,” Birol says.
Streicker agrees – wholeheartedly.
"It could be cap and trade or it could be a carbon tax,” he said. "My response is any one of them. When you invest in energy, you're acknowledging that energy is emitting greenhouse gases and it's got to cost more.”
Streicker doesn't know if the UN's annual climate summits are the best way to reduce global emissions.
He said if Canada doesn't like this process – as our country has shown in the past — we've got to start talking about what we do want.
It all comes back to shifting the energy economy, Streicker said.
"We have let it be known really far in advance that here are the rules, here are the incentives and this is how we're going to get there.”
In other words: a plan.
The climate summit in South Africa will run from Nov. 28 to Dec. 9.
May, who Streicker believes to be the MP most versed in climate change, will not be able to get into the main negotiation room as she is an opposition member.
That, he said, is quite a shame.
The new party president won't be able to contribute to these negotiations either, but knows what his roles will be amongst a sea of around 12,000 scientists, politicians, bureaucrats and activists.
"Even though it's tough to do, I'm going to acknowledge that I am Canadian. Despite the performance of the government, I want to show that we do care about the issue and we are working on it.”
Streicker wants to act as a liaison between what's happening behind the scenes and the Canadian public — especially those who might not know much about these summits. He also wants to put a "concentrated effort” into holding the Canadian team accountable.
In the end, though Streicker's goal is simple.
"I want to help the Canadian government do the right thing.”
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (7)
Up 0 Down 0
north of 60 on Nov 30, 2011 at 2:41 pm
Industrialized nations emit far less carbon dioxide than the Third World, according to latest evidence from Japan's Aerospace Exploration Agency
Bizarrely, the IBUKU maps prove exactly the opposite of all conventional expectations revealing that the least industrialized regions are the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases on the planet.
Yes, you read that correctly: the U.S. and western European nations are areas where CO2 levels are lowest. This new evidence defies the consensus view promoted by mainstream newspapers, such as the New York Times.
http://co2insanity.com/2011/11/15/new-satellite-data-contradicts-carbon-dioxide-climate-theory/
Up 0 Down 0
Up North Yukon on Nov 30, 2011 at 4:43 am
I have no problem with John going to South Africa. I do have a problem with him going with Elizabeth May.
Up 0 Down 0
Original commenter on Nov 29, 2011 at 1:57 pm
Hey CG,
You want some facts? Try this.
China 2009 green house gas emissions, 7.7 billion tonnes. One new coal fired power plant coming online weekly. Their obligations under Kyoto? Absolutely nothing, zero, nada. Same goes for India and the USA for example.
Canada 2009 green house gas emissions, 540 million tonnes. And According to you we're the country with the problem? Yeah Right. So you can talk about per capita all you want to but at the end of the day reducing our 2% GHG by any amount means nothing compared to the emissions the unsigned countries continue to spew out.
Thank God for the Harper government or the lefty wackos would have given away/shut down our whole country by now.
Up 0 Down 0
Proud canadian on Nov 29, 2011 at 12:28 pm
I wake up every day and give thanks for the Conservative Party of Canada and what it stands for, and that includes replacing the Kyoto 'Only the west pays' protocol.
Up 0 Down 0
Don't agree with CG on Nov 29, 2011 at 12:05 pm
Hey CG, maybe Mr.Streickers consorts in the green party elected him to lead their club, but I think the point commenter one was making is that the Yukon voters gave him, his party and his platform a resounding NO. So all he represents is a fringe party, not the Yukon and certainly not Canada.
Up 0 Down 0
CG on Nov 28, 2011 at 3:35 pm
To the first commenter: Streicker was voted in as president of the federal Green Party recently, so, yes, he WAS elected into his position. He certainly has a right to go to this summit.
Secondly, your assumptions about Canada's role in global greenhouse gas emissions is completely and blatantly incorrect. Do some research before you spew out incorrect blather. From http://www.environmentalindicators.com/htdocs/execsum.htm:
"This study compares Canada's environmental record to the other industrialized nations in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and tracks Canada's progress (or lack thereof) on environmental issues over the past two decades. Twenty-five environmental indicators in ten categories – air, water, energy, biodiversity, waste, climate change, ozone depletion, agriculture, transportation and miscellaneous – are examined.
"The study provides accurate, independent information about Canada's track record in protecting the environment. All of the statistical information comes from data verified and published by the OECD.
"The results prove that Canada has one of the poorest environmental records of the industrialized countries. The primary finding is that for the twenty-five environmental indicators examined, Canada's overall ranking among OECD nations is a dismal 28th out of 29."
We may only contribute a small amount of TOTAL emissions in certain areas, but per capita we are consistently one of the worst contributors.
Yeah. A lot to be proud of.
Go Streicker!
Up 0 Down 0
This guy doesn't represent me! on Nov 25, 2011 at 4:48 pm
Canada contributes less than 2 percent to global greenhouse gas emissions. Instead of navel gazing and acting like anything we do is going to affect the world GHG output even slightly I think the do gooders like this guy ought to put pressure on the big contributors, China, India,USA for example. Maybe he ought to look at the satellite photos that consistently show a huge eastward moving plume of dirty smog stretching from China out over the Pacific ocean. Wasn't Canada recently ranked as having the best air quality in the world? And Whitehorse the best air quality in Canada?
Why does someone like Streicker who was never elected even go to something like this conference and pass himself off as representing us?He doesn't represent this Yukoners views.