Whitehorse Daily Star

Yukon judged poorly on drinking water safety

More than a decade after deadly gaps in drinking water management killed seven people in Walkerton, Ont.,

By Whitehorse Star on November 15, 2011

More than a decade after deadly gaps in drinking water management killed seven people in Walkerton, Ont., the Yukon trails behind most other places when it comes to protecting drinking water, according to a new report from Ecojustice.

Waterproof 3, the Vancouver-based environmental organization's third drinking water report card, gives the Yukon a D+.

While it has improved its water treatment standards, the territory does not have specific source water protection planning in place, says the report, released Monday.

The Yukon's low grade is a drop from the C- it received in 2006.

"The Yukon has rules that require separation of drinking water sources and potential contaminant threats, which is a step in the right direction,” said Randy Christensen, an Ecojustice staff lawyer and the author of the report.

"But it is in danger of falling far behind other jurisdictions as they begin to introduce more comprehensive models of source water protection planning.”

Waterproof 3 evaluates water policies, programs and legislation across the country. It then assigns the provincial, territorial and federal governments a grade based on how well they're protecting drinking water.

Released every five years, the report also shows how each jurisdiction has performed over time on critical measures like treatment and testing requirements, drinking water quality standards, source water protection and transparency and accountability.

While the Yukon received a D+, provinces like Ontario (A) and Nova Scotia (A-) have been identified as leaders when it comes to drinking water protection.

That's thanks in large part to strong treatment, testing and source water protection programs, Ecojustice said.

In contrast, Alberta (C-) slipped in the rankings because of static treatment standards and poor source water protection efforts.

"The recommendations from the Walkerton Inquiry gave us a very clear framework for evaluating each jurisdiction's efforts to provide safe drinking water,” Christensen said.

"Those recommendations spell out exactly what it takes to properly monitor and protect drinking water, and yet some regional governments, as well as the federal government, still haven't put them in place.”

The federal government is the only jurisdiction to fail outright in Ecojustice's report card for lagging on almost every aspect of water protection for which it is responsible.

"Of greatest concern is the government's reluctance to create rigorous national drinking water standards that protect people's health and safety,” Ecojustice said.

"The federal government has completely failed in its responsibilities to ensure all Canadians have access to clean, safe water,” Christensen said. "Despite the lessons learned from the tragedy in Walkerton, the federal government has failed to pass drinking water legislation for First Nations and lead the development of national water standards.”

See related story,

Comments (5)

Up 0 Down 0

SS on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:18 pm

DaveDownUnder

For your peace of mind: Whitehorse water no longer comes out of Schwatka, its all from groundwater wells.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:19 am

So in other words, when my tap water smells like a swimming pool, that I should shut up and drink the water? Lol. And brita filters do not remove chlorine, nor any other harmful chemicals. It might make your water taste better but it is nothing short of a scam. I can't change people's opinions, but don't say I don't know what I'm talking about, or use personal attacks. If you can't prove me wrong, maturely, then I suggest not saying anything at all. Remember, every time you bathe yourself with municipal water you are slowing poisoning yourself. For starters get a chlorine filter for your shower. It's a small step, but your body and lungs will thank you.

Up 0 Down 0

YukonMax on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:12 am

I moved to another yukon community a few years back. For some reason, I decided to not deliberately drink the water. Off course I use it to cook and I britta (new verb) for coffee. A couple of years later, the people responsible for monitoring our drinking water were reported for unsafe practices while working. When there are obvious breaches of trust by the people that monitors your drinking water, you start wondering when you will be able to trust anyone.

Up 0 Down 0

DaveDownUnder on Nov 15, 2011 at 1:12 pm

I drink tap water in a city of more than four million, let me tell you that we have have good catchment control in Sydney Australia.

Guess that you don't put any value on that which has always been freely available. Just goes to show how much you do not know about the lessons learned from Walkerton.

Walkerton, down south and Outside, why would you ever bother about that eh?

Tell you why dude ... when you land planes in your tap water and have a highway running alongside your reservoir you will end up with crap out of your tap.

Look after your water man, drinking anything else is just feeding the corporate man.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Nov 15, 2011 at 9:04 am

Who drinks tap water anyway? Lol.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.