Whitehorse Daily Star

YHC successfully butts out lawsuit

A Dawson City man has lost his lawsuit against the Yukon Housing Corp. (YHC) and its recently smoke-free rental units.

By Ashley Joannou on March 13, 2012

A Dawson City man has lost his lawsuit against the Yukon Housing Corp. (YHC) and its recently smoke-free rental units.

Alan Sider took the government to court after the YHC changed its policy and began forbidding tenants from smoking in their homes.

In May 2011, the department decided to convert all of its housing to non-smoking buildings.

That includes all the territory's 650 social housing units as well as the 150 units for government employees.

Seventy social housing units and 28 staff homes are in Dawson City.

"At the time of the change, we were building 125 new units and so we thought it was a good time to switch over to non-smoking units,” Don Routledge, a senior program advisor with the YHC, said Monday.

Tenants already in the buildings were given until Jan. 1, 2012 to comply with the new rule.

Sider, a tenant since before the new policy was created, claimed the new policy couldn't apply to him because there was no mention of a no smoking requirement in the agreement he signed when he moved in.

According to that arrangement, any changes to the contract have to be agreed to by both the tenant and the landlord, Sider said.

In his written decision released Monday, territorial judge John Faulkner pointed to a different clause in the contract. It gives the landlord the right to make regulations regarding the safety, care and cleanliness of the premises and the tenants.

"Smoking inside of the unit affects safety, affects the care, affects cleanliness, and affects other tenants,” he said.

Based on that clause, the judge ruled the YHC is within its rights to create the no indoor smoking rule.

Sider then went on to argue that the new policy, even if the tenancy agreement allows it, goes against his rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The judge disagreed.

"Smoking is not a right protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms nor does the Charter provide, as Mr. Sider suggests, that the law cannot be changed to restrict smoking if not such law existed at the time the Charter came into effect,” Faulkner said.

"This is simply not a correct interpretation of the Charter and, if one needs any proof, one can simply look at the fact that subsequent to the Charter coming into effect, a substantial body of statute law has been passed related to the restricting of smoking, for example, in or near public buildings.”

Routledge said he is pleased the case has come to a close.

"Overall, we've not had a lot of issues with the implementation of the policy,” he said adding that tenants can still smoke outside of their buildings.

Under the new policy, tenants are given two warnings before eviction is a possibility.

To his knowledge, no tenant has been evicted for violating the no smoking indoors rule, Routledge said.

Smoke-free buildings are healthier for all tenants and will save money in the long run by reducing the number of times a unit needs to be repainted or have its carpet changed, he said.

There have been no changes to the YHC's application process, meaning smokers are still welcome to apply as long as they agree not to smoke inside.

As for whether Sider is still living in one of the YHC's buildings, Routledge said he can't comment on specific tenants because of confidentiality concerns.

Comments (7)

Up 0 Down 6

Al Sider on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:05 am

Please, allow me to clarify a couple of things, as it appears that my reasons for taking YHC to court have been misunderstood. First, I was not taking them to court for financial benefit, rather it was a matter of the Landlord and Tenant Act. Second, The Act stated clearly that the Landlord cannot affect changes that restrict the normal enjoyment and usage of the rental unit. My fight with the Government is not to "get rich" my fight is to have Rights and Freedoms which were available prior to the adoptions of the Charter of rights and Freedoms, the Bill of Rights, and the Human Rights Act. All of these state that these Acts do not eliminate the Rights or Freedoms of citizens which were held before these Acts were implemented. Canada is supposed to be a Country which prides itself in Equality, when discrimination and prejudice abound towards any individual or group, for ANY reason, there is no Equality. Where there is no Equality, there is No Freedom,and where there is no Freedom, we have a Police State. A person does not have to agree with smoking to know that Prejudice is Wrong. And let's face it, no matter how you paint it, Wrong will always be Wrong.

Numerous people believe that smoking is such a "negative" thing, and that may be true for the most part, however, I will offer this challenge to all groups or individuals who think that smoking is worse than let's say driving. My challenge is this; any one of you may bring your most recent emmissions efficient Gas or Deisel auto or truck, turn it on and allow it to run. At the same time I will put 25 cigarettes into my mouth. When I light all 25 cigarettes, you may place your lips around your exhaust pipe. Stay like that until I smoke all 25 cigarettes to the filter. Which of us will be dead as a result of this challenge? Therefore, which should really be "Banned", smoking or automobiles? I guarantee that I would walk away very much alive from this challenge, whereas you would not.

Up 0 Down 0

DG on Mar 16, 2012 at 4:51 pm

He was given plenty of time to adjust his way of living. Sad that everyone thinks they can get rich by taking the government to court.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Mar 14, 2012 at 10:05 am

Hey Jay. The man signed documents that did not say you can't smoke. He was right to go to court.

Up 0 Down 1

Northone on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:08 am

Jaymanc, great idea, prohibition of drugs has been such a success story I think we need to do the same with cigarettes...why didn't someone think of this sooner?

All that would do is add yet one more item to the list of things that make organized criminals rich...

Up 0 Down 0

complain!!! on Mar 14, 2012 at 5:15 am

Janet - start filing some complaints so the smokers can be kicked out and people that are willing to respect the rules can be moved in.

Up 0 Down 0

Jaymanc on Mar 13, 2012 at 11:30 pm

Well smoking should be illegal as far as I'm concerned as I am a smoker myself. But for this gentleman going to court over smoking in a non smoking unit is absurd. Either quit or find your own place to smoke in. If you can afford to smoke than you can afford to buy your own place. And hopefully in the near future they will illegalize smoking cigarettes.

Up 1 Down 0

janet on Mar 13, 2012 at 9:35 am

I live in a yh apartment downtown and i guess it doesn't apply to this building. All you smell is pot and cig smoke.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.