Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

SUBJECT OF DISPUTE – The constructor of the single-parent housing complex (above) on Nisutlin Drive in Riverdale says it has repaired the deficiencies, but still hasn't received the payment it's owed from the Yukon Housing Corp.

YHC-contractor standoff lands in court

The Yukon Housing Corp. seems to be at a standoff with the constructor of the single-parent housing complex in Riverdale over the last $85,000 owed on the project.

By Justine Davidson on July 27, 2011

The Yukon Housing Corp. seems to be at a standoff with the constructor of the single-parent housing complex in Riverdale over the last $85,000 owed on the project.

NGC Building filed documents with the Yukon Supreme Court last week asking the court to either appoint a mediator to settle the dispute, or simply order the government to pay the outstanding balance on the construction bill.

According to the company's lawsuit, the four buildings were completed last fall and the housing corporation issued a certificate of substantial performance last Oct. 10.

An inspection identified some "deficiencies” in the work, and the housing corporation held back $85,000 until those issues were fixed.

NGC claims it has "completed substantially all of the work identified as deficiencies,” but the government still hasn't paid the outstanding balance.

Although there are no details in the court file about what was not completed to the housing corporation's satisfaction, a person who is familiar with the buildings told the Star there are a number of problems.

According to the source, the water pressure was "a nightmare” for the first couple of months, and although it has been fixed, "the water pressure in many units is still terrible.”

The heating systems under the kitchen sinks were so hot they started melting the cabinets, presenting a safety risk to babies and toddlers. They have since been disconnected but not fixed, the person said.

Some units' cabinets and countertops cracked within months of tenants moving in, and paint jobs were not complete, the person said.

Other issues that have been dealt with included doors which did not fit properly and could not be locked for the first couple of months.

The person asked not to be named because they were not authorized to speak about the project.

All of those issues – with the exception of the water pressure which is likely associated with the city's infrastructure – are "totally standard with the breaking in of a new building,” Doug Gilday said on behalf of the construction company.

One heating system did malfunction, and was disconnected while a replacement was ordered, he said.

When tenants moved in, "we were not satisfied with the paint job, and we went in and fixed it,” Gilday noted. The same goes for the cracked cabinets and countertops.

"As buildings adjust to being newly placed, there is some movement,” he said. "It's standard practice to be expected to go in and deal with that once everything is settled.”

Speaking to the Star last week, housing corporation spokesperson Nathalie Ouellett said, "There are deficiencies, but it's just standard stuff,” such as issues with the roof.

She did not have any details about what was wrong with the roof, but said contractors had been working to fix it.

"It's not uncommon,” Gilday said. "It's a $6-million job, there's 32 units. It was a big project.”

"It is standard that there are deficiencies when there is a new building,” Ouellett said, noting there is a two-year warranty on the work.

But according to the court documents, the housing corporation is not allowing NGC to come into the building and fix the remaining problems.

"I do know that we are trying to get these issues addressed with as little disruption (to the tenants) as possible,” Ouellett said. "So that might be where that's coming from.”

"We were active in cleaning up details at the end of the project, and now we're at the point where we're at a bit of a standoff,” Gilday said last week.

By Monday morning, the housing corporation was refusing to comment on the entire matter.

"It has gone the legal route and we're not in a position to comment,” said corporation spokesperson Chris Scherbarth.

Comments (3)

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Jul 30, 2011 at 1:43 am

Shoddy construction? Oh no, it's the building settling. Give me a break. I've been saying this for years. It's amazing how fast some of these condos and buildings go up. And bought without thought even quicker. 90% of the people building homes up here are not even from here. lol? By the time problems start showing up, they are long gone down south, counting your money.

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Jul 28, 2011 at 10:18 pm

I have some issues with this very project and the logic that started it.

Hopefully we all still remember when the government wished to build it for single moms only?

...and were surprised with the backlash?

good indicator on just how out of touch the government(s) are with the real world, as much of the time allowing special interest groups to govern Vs. the folks whom we elected.

I really do wonder...since it is a facility owned by all tax payers, can one get monthly updates on the Venus/ Mars ratios...the ethnicity of tenants?

Some may say matters not and very much NOT my affairs...so blow!

Except of course I see it different.

If the Mars types are under represented, then that tells me?

The new & allegedly improved criteria for occupying a suite, is a white wash. With a mere "change", everybody's quiet and the governments are happy they avoided yet another discriminatory policy adding to the epic quagmire of the others already existing.

I'll will try through FOI to keep track of our newest digs built & whom lives in said unit.

Stuffing the place with "temporary" foreign workers and their off spring, will piss me off more than the original idea of single momland.

Whitehorse is a city NOT a reserve, that said...this place is peppered with social housing. It should be a community of progress not digress, where folks whom wish to INVEST & build lives here can.

Houses we own on LAND we own that are created with our own cash (well the bank's I guess)..NOT the feds...YTG or the city.

The social issues created by this over the top PC revolution creates a very slippery slope.

I have seen some pretty nice vehicles in that new parking lot, when I was a wee tyke if our klan wished to travel?

My single WHITE mom & her 5 little white kids...took the bus, not cabs.

Up 0 Down 0

Melba Disco Dancing Queen on Jul 27, 2011 at 9:46 am

I have to say, this came in much lower than I recall the estimates being way back. I thought they were spending 12 million or 14 million for these 32 units? My memory could be failing me here but that was my recollection from way back when the gov't first started talking about the project.

I don't have a calculator handy but these units cost about $188,000 each if this company was the only contractor working there. (6mil/32) That's not too bad.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.