Photo by Vince Fedoroff
AERODROME’S MANAGEMENT DISCUSSED – A float plane lands as youth learn sailing at Schwatka Lake in July 2015. The management of the Schwatka Lake aerodrome was discussed at Monday evening’s city council meeting.
Photo by Vince Fedoroff
AERODROME’S MANAGEMENT DISCUSSED – A float plane lands as youth learn sailing at Schwatka Lake in July 2015. The management of the Schwatka Lake aerodrome was discussed at Monday evening’s city council meeting.
The Yukon government needs to step up and take over the designation as the official operator of the Schwatka Lake float plane base, city council heard Monday night.
The Yukon government needs to step up and take over the designation as the official operator of the Schwatka Lake float plane base, city council heard Monday night.
Darryl Laliberté of the Canadian Owners and Pilots Association (COPA) told council the time is right to de-list the city as the operator and list the Yukon government.
Transport Canada has just announced a new initiative where float plane bases inside populated areas will need to be certified, with an official operator designated, he pointed out.
With that designation will come the responsibilities of managing an aerodrome according to the requirements set out be the federal government, Laliberté said.
The city, he said, would become an airport operator, and it would need a separate department with the infrastructure and staff required to manage an aerodrome.
It just wouldn’t be feasible, he suggested.
Laliberté said it only makes sense to have the Yukon government designated as the official operator under the new initiative by Transport Canada because it already operates all the other aerodromes in the territory.
It’s the hope of the local chapter of the owners and pilots association that the city and the Yukon government will get together, discuss the issue and ultimately have the designation as operator transferred to the Yukon, he said.
“We would like a transfer,” Laliberté told members of council.
“We would like a meeting of the minds here.”
The vice-president of the pilots association emphasized the Schwatka Lake float plane base is a valuable economic asset, not just for Whitehorse but for the whole of the territory.
Four commercial operators fly out Schwatka to service the outfitting industry, the tourism industry, the mining industry and so forth, Laliberté noted.
He said the entire territory is impacted by commercial activity that originates on Schwatka Lake, not just Whitehorse.
City staff were directed to provide members of city council with more information about the issue.
Coun. Samson Hartland raised the matter of the Schwatka Lake float plane base. He cited a meeting he’s had with the representatives of COPA and letters sent to the city by COPA, the Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce and the National Aviation Transportation Industry.
Hartland said now is the appropriate time to discuss the transfer, as the Yukon government announced this past spring it’s hired a local consulting firm for $187,465 to provide a vision of aviation needs in the Yukon over the next 10 years.
Whitehorse does not have the capacity to manage air traffic nor aviation safety, he said.
The councillor said the Yukon government is the logical choice as the designated operator with an established aviation branch already managing 28 aerodromes across the territory.
In an interview Tuesday, Hartland said he’s not sure how the city got to be designated as the operator. He suspects it was more by default than anything else – the float plane base is in the city, so the city is the operator.
But with the move by federal government to formalize the operator status of float plane bases within populated areas, he said, it’s time to transfer the official designation to the Yukon government.
Mike Gau is the city’s director of development services. He told council there have been no official discussions with the Yukon regarding the transfer, as city administration has not been directed to undertake such discussions.
He said administration would need that direction from council, and until then, the city will continue to manage the aerodrome.
Coun. Dan Boyd told his elected colleagues when he thinks about managing the float plane base, he’s thinking about dock spaces and so forth, not managing an aerodrome.
“I would ask for more information,” Boyd said.
Mayor Dan Curtis echoed Boyd’s thoughts. He said he’d like to hear from the Yukon government to get a better understanding of what their intention is.
In a letter to city council last Friday, COPA president Christoph Altherr said the Schwatka Lake float plane base is part of the territory-wide transportation infrastructure. As such, it may be beyond the city’s mandate, he said.
“Furthermore, earlier this month, Transport Canada unveiled a proposal to certify water aerodromes,” says the letter. “Once these regulations come into place, YG may have to take responsibility of Schwatka Lake Aerodrome.
“All this leads us to the conclusion that it would be in the best interest of all parties involved if the City would hand over the management of Schwatka Lake aerodrome, its facilities and the land on the west shore to YG since they have the resources and experience to deal with aviation.”
The Yukon government could still follow the city’s Schwatka Lake Area Plan adopted in 2015, since it covers the needs of all users at the lake, says the letter from COPA.
COPA has been pushing the city to provide more dock space and parking for the float plane base, though it says the city has been slow to act. The city points out it is taking steps to widen the road and is preparing budget submissions for the construction.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (9)
Up 5 Down 0
Groucho d'North on Aug 5, 2019 at 11:32 am
YG assuming responsibility for the Schwatka float plane base? Imagine what a cluster of ducks they could create if that happens.
Up 8 Down 1
Evil Bureaucrat on Aug 2, 2019 at 10:21 pm
Hey CJ, you should do your homework before pontificating. If you had, you would realize that no floatplane base in the country is run by a provincial or territorial government. So if every other "little municipality" in Canada with a floatplane base is able to run it, why can't Whitehorse?
Up 14 Down 3
Red Baron on Aug 1, 2019 at 1:17 pm
@B Yes been there many times. Most harbor aerodromes present different geographical advantages. Clear arrival and departure paths. Designated landing areas. Aviation regulations are changing. Liability driven.
The responsibility to assume liability of an aerodrome is immense.
The key phrase in this is - "a new initiative where float plane bases inside POPULATED areas will need to be certified" (certification comes with responsibility)
Who is going to assume the liability for an aerodrome that has 50% of its arrivals and departures over a built up area? i.e over the City of Whitehorse.
Insurance companies will dictate where aircraft will depart and arrive. Believe you me, the cost of insurance on Schwatka will come with a huge bill.
I am surprised, that even today, the environmental and fisheries branches allow the storage of aviation fuels and lubricants on a lake right above a fish ladder.
The issue is not about compatibility - the issue is liability.
Dan Boyd is right - the COW might want to have a second look at this one. Or better yet - look away!
Up 12 Down 5
B on Aug 1, 2019 at 11:35 am
Red Baron.... have you ever been to the inner harbour in Victoria? There are float planes, ferries, water taxi, and tourism operators all in an area smaller than Schwatka Lake. It's possible for everyone to share this space.
Up 14 Down 6
CJ on Aug 1, 2019 at 11:32 am
They make some valid points about it being beyond the city's capacity. How many municipalities in Canada are involved with managing aviation? I was astonished to hear on the news that YTG doesn't want to do it.
I've had it with this Liberal government. Their neo-liberal mindset just seems to leave us with this kind of subterranean incompetence that permeates everything they're supposed to be managing. When they communicate at all, it's to broadcast their own satisfaction with how they handle things. I vote Liberal federally, but the two parties have very little in common.
It's absolutely ridiculous to think this little municipality can handle the complexities of a float plane base, and if they do, the inevitable cost overruns would be paid for by Whitehorse residents, one way or another.
Up 3 Down 11
Yukonmax on Aug 1, 2019 at 7:29 am
Amphibious can take off and land at the airport. Give them the workload.
Just saying...
Change your landing gears.
Up 22 Down 4
jack on Jul 31, 2019 at 3:14 am
Great, three more +100K YTG salaries required this new management!!
Up 2 Down 28
Don Thorp on Jul 30, 2019 at 7:45 pm
With the Schwatka Lake Area Plan and the Robert Service Way Plan and public use of the lake the city should manage float plane use. This makes aircraft lease areas and public use by power boaters, canoe and kayakers as well as environmental protection and use of the Miles Canyon Road all under one authority.
The City has lots on their plate but they have the staff and goodwill required to manage aircraft use.
Up 20 Down 8
Red Baron on Jul 30, 2019 at 3:33 pm
This could get real interesting. I see a huge conflict developing between YG/COW and TC. Where will the recreational user fit into to this. Aerodrome security and safety issues will trump recreational use. Environmental concerns about fuel and oil in the lake will trump all.
The logical solution is to move the air base outside of “populated areas”. This would resolve the need to have it designated “An aerodrome”.
There is no way that any one of the players will accept the liability in face of civil litigation. Even if they do, the insurance costs will be astronomical, and these costs would need to be passed onto local float operators.
This will be the final nail in the coffin.