
Photo by Photo Submitted
REGULATION ANNOUNCED – An ATVer enjoys an excursion in the backcountry. The Yukon government has unveiled three new areas that will have only limited access to trails.
Photo by Photo Submitted
REGULATION ANNOUNCED – An ATVer enjoys an excursion in the backcountry. The Yukon government has unveiled three new areas that will have only limited access to trails.
The Yukon government is inching toward establishing an effective framework to controlling the use of off-road vehicles.
The Yukon government is inching toward establishing an effective framework to controlling the use of off-road vehicles.
The territory is one of the few jurisdictions in Canada that doesn’t have a practical and implemented template for managing the popular vehicles.
They include quads, side-by-sides, amphibious vehicles such as ARGOs, mini-bikes, dirt bikes and any motor vehicle that’s being driven elsewhere than a highway, regardless of whether it’s registered under the Motor Vehicles Act.
That’s about to change, although it will take some time to set up all of the framework for the new regulation announced Thursday.
Snowmobiles are exempt, at least for the moment.
The new legislation provides the first concrete actions by the government on the issue that’s been debated for years without any concrete action being taken.
It unveiled three new areas that will have only limited access to trails from this point forward, which is bound to be controversial in some quarters.
“The new Off-Road Vehicle Management Area Regulation will allow additional control of off-road vehicle use in identified areas in Yukon,” the government announced during a news conference Thursday.
“The regulation will provide an effective regime to prevent, reduce and mitigate the environmental impacts of off-road vehicle use on public land, while recognizing the needs of responsible off-road vehicle users.”
The conference was led by deputy Premier Ranj Pillai, who is also the minister of Energy, Mines and Resources, among other portfolios.
“Our government has worked with Yukoners to develop regulations that will protect the landscape and continue to allow people to use their off-road vehicles responsibly for work and recreation,” he said.
Pillai said the new regulatory regime will be phased in with a heavy emphasis on educating the public for the next year.
The government is still working on making changes to the Motor Vehicles Act and establishing a fine schedule to flesh out the regulation introduced Thursday.
Pillai said the new regulation will also assist the government in meeting commitments made with respect to planned areas such as the Peel watershed region and Ddhaw Ghro Habitat Protection Area.
Those are two of the designated areas where the regulation will apply, along the alpine areas above 1,400 metres in elevation controlled by the government.
Pillai said he’s most excited about that provision.
“It’s a complete limitation on establishing new trails in alpine areas. People have to stay on the trails,” he said.
Those regions had been a particular hot point in the controversy over regulating off-road vehicles, he said, and have been showing signs of damage in ecologically sensitive areas.
“We know outdoor vehicles are important to Yukoners,” Pillai said.
“We’ve been engaging on this for years, but this is a policy for all Yukoners. That’s why the approach will be education-based to start with.”
The regulation doesn’t apply to First Nation lands, private property or areas controlled by municipalities.
The new regulation was described as a “new toolbox” by government officials at the news conference.
Pillai admitted the regulations will be difficult to enforce once the education period ends.
“It’s absolutely difficult to enforce,” he acknowledged. “That’s why there will be fines.”
Natural resources officers (NROs) will be the first line of enforcement, Pillai said, with the possibility conservation officers could also be involved.
The are about 30 NROs available to patrol the Yukon currently.
The news release stated “Off-Road Vehicle Management Area Regulation was developed following extensive engagement with Yukon First Nations, stakeholders and the public over the last decade.
“Yukoners have told us that regulating off-road vehicle use is needed to address environmental impacts related to increased ORV use in the backcountry, and we have listened,” the release said.
“Off-road vehicles give Yukoners access to the backcountry for work, hunting and recreation, and this access may have impacts on sensitive terrain and habitats.”
The regulation initially creates three Management Areas, including Alpine Areas, a portion of the Peel Watershed region and the Ddhaw Ghro Habitat Protection Area.
Vern Peters of the Trails Only Yukon Association told the Star the group is “cautiously optimistic” about the regulations.
He said the organization wants time to take a deeper look into what the government is doing before commenting further.
It’s planning on holding a news conference next Thursday to further discuss the regulation.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (36)
Up 4 Down 3
TheHammer on Feb 4, 2021 at 2:45 pm
William Kleedehn@ I was surprised to read your comparison between moose and ATVs. You forgot to mention the noise and oil & gas pollution, and the entire industrial & military & technological and material complex that goes into the making of ATVs, and what happens to them when no longer functional.
Up 5 Down 3
TheHammer on Feb 4, 2021 at 12:51 pm
Max Mack@ why aren't horse and humans regulated? What a dumb question. How much noise does a horse make? Since when have horse and hikers disturbed the peace of the wild and frightened away wild life. Four wheelers ATVs churn up the ground, not to mention the pollution of the air. There's a side effect of ATV riders, its called tunnel vision.
Up 1 Down 1
Atom on Feb 3, 2021 at 7:30 pm
Max M...
We are at 740 ish meters I think in whitehorse
Up 23 Down 5
Max Mack on Feb 2, 2021 at 5:10 pm
With an average elevation of about 1,200m above sea-level, and with substantial areas of land set aside for parks, protected areas and other "no-go" zones, much of the Yukon will be off-limits to ORVs.
Fun facts. Wheeled ATVs exert only about 2 psi. A walking human (aka "hiker") exerts more force than that. A galloping horse exerts about 500 psi. And, those oh-so-environmentally-conscious mountain bikers exert about 40 psi.
So, why aren't those things regulated?
Up 26 Down 2
William Kleedehn on Feb 2, 2021 at 3:19 pm
@ BnR "Back before ATVs, things were A LOT different"... sure they were, they used dozers to get firewood, lol. Never mind widening existing highways, roads and shopping centers built over wetlands (Wal Mart area etc.) in the name of safety, progress and convenience. As long as someone makes big money it's all fine, let's harp on them dumb and dirty rednecks and hand out restrictions. Makes us environmental conscious look much better, lol.
Up 9 Down 30
Nathan Living on Feb 2, 2021 at 12:51 pm
Woodland caribou, sheep, wolves, bears, alpine nesting birds, and even a few beautiful wildflowers support these regulations.
Why is there always bullying and the dogma that a group which has always been destructive questions why people from Ontario and the government wants to place restrictions on them?
Up 14 Down 18
BnR on Feb 2, 2021 at 8:30 am
Old Stock Sourdough. First of all, you're just another transplant, no better or worse than the couple who moved up here last summer. Sure, things used to be different, back when there were 15,000 people here in town, things were different. Back before ATVs, things were A LOT different. Every time the population grows, things change. This legislation is needed because every year, there's more and more people moving here to get away from it all. Problem is, with more people comes increased impact. Now's the time to address this issue.
Count yourself lucky that you got to experience The Yukon before the change.
The first commenter makes a really good point though, what about the outfitters? Yukoners need to wake up to the fact that outfitters are driving government policy decisions in all areas, especially game management and harvest allocations. Additionally, outfitters are building new camps everywhere, without the required approvals, and the government is turning a blind eye to it, because they know Yukon residents don't complain, but outfitters do.
Up 17 Down 19
Atom on Feb 2, 2021 at 7:20 am
@Mike
If you paid a 'pretty penny' for your house etc it means you are a recent addition to the Yukon....and you sound like it.
These rules will have a very minimal effect in my use of ATV's. I hit every corner of the Yukon through last years hunting season and never ventured off an existing trail, at any elevation. I didn't go mud bugging that's for sure.
Freezer is full. These rules could have been in place and I would never have felt any restriction.
Besides, I could always use my boat or just fly in somewhere if the quad or sidexside wasn't going to work....just like every year.
Good job Liberals! At least somebody has a spine and is creative enough to control the idiots on machines who like making mud and noise.
Up 36 Down 8
Carli G on Feb 1, 2021 at 1:09 pm
It doesn’t make sense to me that a non resident can pay a hunting outfitter whose also non resident to drive around in the alpine on Argos but a tax paying permanent Yukon resident who uses the land to fill their freezers are banned from riding the same areas.
Up 31 Down 16
KC on Feb 1, 2021 at 7:28 am
I have both a quad and a side by side and I see these rules as pretty reasonable. Two larger prohibited areas in the territory and you have to stick to existing trails in the Alpine. Probably will be difficult to impossible to enforce anyway but those are eminently reasonable restrictions.
Up 50 Down 7
Old Stock Sourdough on Jan 31, 2021 at 4:49 pm
This will be a bit of a rant, venturing into some off topic discussion, so scroll past it if you like, for the others, please read along.
So.... this off road vehicle restriction, along with the new restriction coming on e-bike's and of course the outsiders telling us that "sourdough" needs to be removed from the rendezvous name is what you get when more and more people from outside come here, get into government legislative positions and tell us what is best.
It is really really sad of what the Yukon is turning into. This used to be a place where anyone and everyone could move to, adopt to the unwritten rules of the land and have a good life. Many such as myself left the rat race (Vancouver in my case) in the early 80's moved here and have enjoyed every year of living here.
For the past decade this place seems to have its uniqueness and charm legislated away by fresh newcomers who want to turn it into another carbon copy of where they're from. Sad indeed.
Up 28 Down 12
Philip Merchant on Jan 31, 2021 at 4:24 pm
Perhaps everyone should take the time to read the Off-Road Vehicle Management Area Regulations. They DO NOT close one existing trail in the Alpine above 1400 m (about tree line) outside the two named areas already in place. They do prevent the creation of NEW trails above 1400 m. They put any future ORV management into the hands of public land planning processes where the PUBLIC ON ALL SIDES OF THE ISSUE can have their say.
Up 30 Down 8
RJ on Jan 31, 2021 at 3:53 pm
Racial discrimination at it best. I thought segregation was over. Liberals passing this at the end of a term. Hopefully this next election will finalize this BS.
Up 22 Down 21
moe on Jan 31, 2021 at 1:40 pm
The article says FN lands are exempt, not that FN people on YTG - YG - GY land are exempt. (When are bureaucrats going to run out of letter combinations anyway?)
However, my guess is it will be the usual where 20% of the population gets to wreck whatever they want. This severely undermines the efforts of the other 80%, and those in FN communities who are working hard to protect ecosystems.
It would be nice if 100% of our population recognized that we do not have the ethical 'right' to run over frogs, bird nests, plants etc. for the sake of good times and hunting. Get off your motorized vehicle when you leave a trail and stop being so lazy and entitled.
As for being old and/or disabled, if you have to ride a quad or argo over plants and animals to enjoy yourself or hunt, I suggest that your days of doing whatever you want in sensitive habitats are over. Or take it as motivation to get in shape. Every single one of us will reach an age where we can't do everything we could do when we were young, if we're lucky. Quit acting like a victim. Go cry in your fruit loops and get over it. Have some consideration for the generations coming after you and the animals who's home these places are. This territory acts like old people are paragons of virtue who must be placed first, so have some dignity act like it's true. That goes for the First Nations as well.
Up 28 Down 6
Groucho d'North on Jan 31, 2021 at 12:52 pm
ATVs are a poor man's horse and afford many the opportunity to explore further in the bush. I am curious how YG expects to enforce these new rules unless the enforcers are also riding similar vehicles or flying above in expensive choppers. Regulations and logic often collide and I think this will be fraught with problems - especially with the exempted users riding their 'traditional' machines.
Up 17 Down 26
BnR on Jan 31, 2021 at 11:56 am
Keep in mind that this has been in the works for a long time, beginning with the Yukon Party, so blaming it on the libs is BS.
Up 8 Down 28
unReal on Jan 31, 2021 at 10:17 am
Also, lots of damage created by folks from other jurisdictions come up for joy riding in our home.
Please don't allow ski-doos above the tree line. They make a convenient packed trail for wolves to easily reach and clean out sheep populations which were previously protected!!
Up 50 Down 21
Jake on Jan 30, 2021 at 9:12 pm
What terrible government these liberals are. Skewed consultation results, indigenous exemptions, outfitter favors, c'mon call an election, enough.
Up 40 Down 17
bonanzajoe on Jan 30, 2021 at 4:29 pm
Well, looks like the Lieberals want more "control" like it says in the heading of this article. Control of course means more tax money to be squandered by them.
Up 33 Down 5
umm? on Jan 30, 2021 at 2:20 pm
so can I use onroad vehicles?
Up 31 Down 27
Nathan Living on Jan 30, 2021 at 1:59 pm
I think this effort will mean more physical work for hunters.
I recall people physically training years ago before a hunt and do not know if that is still the case. You of course still work when hunting with an ATV but it's much harder to travel and haul things.
Yukon is not a park but people on machines should have low impact on the environment which is why I support these regulations.
People are going to complain and resist these regulations but why would you feel entitled to operate ATVs in alpine areas?
Up 38 Down 22
Wilf Carter on Jan 30, 2021 at 10:28 am
Ranj - what knowledge do you have in this subject, none? All public lands and all Yukoners will be treated = right? I have travelled the back country of the Yukon since 1987 and most people are respectful of our environment but there are some that call themselves environmentalist but do not respect our land. We have hauled out so much garbage.
No bikes or AVT's above 1400 M's that will cut off a lot of the trails I used to travel on in Yukon especially hunting caribou, sheep, goats, moose, etc. Moose and caribou are base food of most hunters in Yukon. Whitehorse's main street is 2800 feet above sea level. That's = 930 M's above see level. That's only 570 away from max hunting levels. No hunting on north Canol, Can Tung road, Faro mountains, etc that cuts down about 60% of the hunting area in Yukon.
Up 51 Down 8
Spud on Jan 30, 2021 at 10:06 am
Seems like a lot of BS to me. Appears to be an excuse to hire more YG enforcement people thus increasing our taxes, taxes, taxes.
Up 69 Down 4
Moose101 on Jan 30, 2021 at 5:38 am
Interesting. Does this apply to everyone or can First Nation hunters use their ATVs in areas where I can’t - if so that is not right ,
Up 42 Down 16
William Kleedehn on Jan 29, 2021 at 10:19 pm
Wonder if people ever traveled outside the Whitehorse area. If there ain't trails you can't get there in the first place. The little bit of actual off-road travel is not worth the ink the regs are written on. I admit that ARGOs don't fit this category but a regular ATV does no more long term 'damage' than any of the 60,000 moose roaming the country.
Up 19 Down 56
Davis on Jan 29, 2021 at 9:27 pm
Very happy to hear this news!
Personally I think these regulations are very light but at least it's a good start and better than nothing.
Up 62 Down 14
comen sense on Jan 29, 2021 at 9:21 pm
The regulation doesn’t apply to First Nation lands. YG ( Liberals) are not seeing it like we are all equal. More rule for one, not the other. Special rights for one interest group but it is different for the next person.
Up 48 Down 12
Juniper Jackson on Jan 29, 2021 at 8:16 pm
The Liberals just have their nosy little ^^es into everything. AND picking favorites as usual.
Up 73 Down 9
Joe on Jan 29, 2021 at 6:30 pm
Getting a bit tired of the indigenous exclusions.
Up 43 Down 14
Guncache on Jan 29, 2021 at 6:18 pm
How will this affect those that are not physically able to walk very far. Is the liberal government condoning discrimination against physically handicap people? Is it right to penalize everyone because of the actions of a few? Do the granola bar down south crunches dictate who can use the back country? I can't walk as far as I used to be able to. I can see a court case coming up against the liberal government for discrimination against physically handicapped people
Up 37 Down 13
Josey Wales on Jan 29, 2021 at 6:05 pm
lemme speculate...."traditional" ORV use will be just fine.
Those SS Liberals are hitting us on many angles.
It is a power lust outta control, never mind the "claim of the day" we must heed.
This is a throw back to Pat Duncans team of fools when they very near peppered this place with parks ....35 or so.
Land grabs & power-lust via subjugation and racial division...is all the team Red blowholes know.
Up 62 Down 13
Max Mack on Jan 29, 2021 at 5:55 pm
"Our government has worked with Yukoners "
Meaning, Liberals, eco-zealots and FNs. Everyone else can go p** up a rope. Classic Silver/Liberals style consultation.
Not surprisingly, FNs are exempt from the very laws they are demanding to be applied to "colonizers".
And, the Trails Only Association does not speak for Yukoners. They do speak for government, FNs, and environmental advocacy groups. however. Funny that. Follow the money.
Up 48 Down 17
Mike on Jan 29, 2021 at 5:09 pm
Make all the ridiculous rules you want nobody is going to abide by something that is made to benefit outsiders instead of Yukoners. We pay a pretty penny for our homes, taxes and our toys only to be told we can't use them for our outdoor activities. Nonsense! This covid restraint crap has given this government false power they think they can implement rules that have nobody's interest in mind but the rich and to minimize our rights
Up 47 Down 18
Peter on Jan 29, 2021 at 5:00 pm
Here we go again. YTG again making regulations that will affect people that have disabilities and use motorised transportation. They fail to recognize and discriminate to this group . If a person is disabled they have the right to access areas that a normal person with no disabilities can go and use transportation as need. STOP DISCRIMINATING!
Or a human rights complaint will follow with a court action. Election Year!
Up 15 Down 65
EJ on Jan 29, 2021 at 3:58 pm
Nice to see the government following through with this. The last government during which Currie was the Environment minister said they would but just dropped it as soon as they encountered a bit of pushback. Thankfully we now have a government with a spine. Let's hope it stays that way after the election and we don't go back with the old Pasloski crew.
Up 75 Down 7
Wes on Jan 29, 2021 at 3:40 pm
So will big game outfitters here in The Yukon have to follow the legislation, or do they get a pass? More and more, outfitters are abandoning horses and using ORVs, mostly Argos. There are really remote spots when you fly into them, there's Argo trails everywhere. Algae lake up in Jim Shockey area comes to mind.
Will the new laws only affect Yukon residents, and the outfitters get to carry on? Seems like outfitters are going to be getting what they want, which is the government restricting hunting access for Yukoners.