Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

A GREENER RIDE –­ Thanks to more than $156,000 from the Yukon government, three fast-chargers for electric vehicles will be installed in Whitehorse and Carcross this summer. Here, last Friday, Shane Andre with the energy branch is seen where an existing conventional charger is available to the public at the Yukon Government Main Administrative Building.

YG, feds fund electric car charging stations

Three fast-charging stations for electric vehicles will be coming to Whitehorse and Carcross this summer.

By Palak Mangat on May 7, 2019

Three fast-charging stations for electric vehicles will be coming to Whitehorse and Carcross this summer.

They’ll be paired with a study of how such cars operate in colder climates, thanks to more than $360,000 coming from the federal and Yukon governments.

The announcement was made last Friday by a number of officials.

Set at Level 3, the stations will be at the Visitor Information Centre and the NorthLight Innovation building in the city, as well as the Carcross-Tagish First Nation (CTFN) Learning Centre in Carcross.

There are already Level 2 conventional chargers for such cars at the Yukon Transportation Museum, Mount Lorne waste management site and the Yukon Government Main Administration Building.

The different levels translate into different charging times:

• level 1 is a common household outlet at 120 volts and can charge a car overnight;

• level 2 is similar to a household outlet for clothes dryers at 240 volts and takes a few hours to charge a car; and

• level 3 is set at 480 volts and can charge a car in 30 minutes.

Yukon MP Larry Bagnell pointed out the transportation sector tends to make up 25 per cent of total greenhouse gas emissions.

Most of that includes cars, trucks and heavy duty vehicles, he added.

“The fast ones are much more modern and faster – maybe 20 minutes as opposed to a good portion of the day,” Bagnell said. The goal is to encourage electric cars as an attractive option for Yukoners, even in colder temperatures, he added.

The federal government will be pitching in $212,000 for the cost of the charging stations. YG will add $156,250 in funding, for a total of $368,250.

The project will see data collected to look at how travel range and efficiencies of electric cars change throughout the year for a three-year study.

Partners include the CTFN, Northern Vision Development (NVD), Yukon College’s Cold Climate Innovation, ATCO Electric Yukon and Yukonstruct.

Energy, Mines and Resources Minister Ranj Pillai was joined by Highways and Public Works Minister Richard Mostyn for last Friday’s event, along with officials from the CTFN, the college and NVD.

The partnership to study the impacts and changes around the usage were perhaps the most worth noting, Bagnell said.

“The second part to me is the genius part of this program, because you could just prima facie decide, ‘we’ll just give out money everywhere for charging stations,’” he said.

“But people don’t realize that in the parts of the country ... in rural areas where it’s 40 below, they’re not just going to jump out and do that because they won’t know if it will work.”

Noting that the ideal distance between such chargers is more than 60 kilometres, Pillai added there are 12 electric vehicles registered in the Yukon – including the government’s lone Chevrolet car, Sparky.

“When people look into buying an electric car, they are often concerned with its range of travel and its performance in cold weather,” Pillai said.

“We hope this is a starting point for developing a territory-wide electrified transportation network that makes use of electric vehicles.”

Mostyn echoed this, adding the average Yukoner tends to commute about 13 kilometres to and from work each day.

He added his department will be working to have such infrastructure in place that can support charging stations from the get-go.

“That is, we are now looking at all the new buildings we’re building and instead of having to retrofit those buildings five or six years down the road, we’re trying to do it proactively – putting those charging stations in place now so that we are saving money and being efficient,” Mostyn said.

The government acknowledged there can be difficulties around getting Yukoners on board with electric cars: access to clean electricity, colder temperatures, remote communities and limited dealership options can be challenges.

“I don’t think it’s going to be very long before all car companies are onside,” Bagnell said.

“They’ve seen the writing on the wall; Volvo isn’t going to produce a single car anymore that burns fossil fuel.”

The manufacturing giant confirmed two years ago that from 2019 onward, all new cars would be partially or completely battery-operated – in an effort to end vehicles that only have an internal combustion engine.

Mostyn suspects that with incentives and support from governments, “we’re going to see an awful lot more buy-in from the part of the public and also dealerships, and I have no doubt that they will start to innovate.”

The three charging stations can be used free of charge to the public.

As of Tuesday, a tender to supply, install and provide other management services went out for three fast chargers in the territory. With that tender set to close June 6, documents show, work is to begin July 1 and wrap up by September’s end.

Meanwhile, last week’s event comes sooner than two months after the feds unveiled their March budget and fewer than six months away from October’s federal election.

In the Yukon, it will see the Liberal Bagnell challenged for his seat by Conservative Jonas Smith and New Democrat Justin Lemphers.

No one has announced for the Green Party.

Comments (36)

Up 1 Down 0

Miles Canyon on May 13, 2019 at 10:44 pm

When the prices for electric vehicles decline and battery technology improves people will buy them.
Some governments will ensure more electric cars are on the market and tax breaks will be used to promote sales to people who cannot afford them.

These cars will help people in many ways including providing a healthier environment.
Thanks for all the facts Jim!

Up 8 Down 9

Well said Jim Hawkings on May 12, 2019 at 3:29 pm

But unfortunately there seems to be a real divide on this issue, and for the life of me I can't figure out why. If I had $40,000 to spend on an electric vehicle or a full-size pickup, all I'd have to do is look at the monthly costs to help me make my decision. Electric vehicles aren't just for the 'elite' or 'government workers', but as with other issues, there's a real anger towards people who adopt new technology or want to actually do something to reduce carbon emissions. Human nature I guess.

Up 11 Down 13

Jim Hawkings on May 12, 2019 at 11:09 am

Here are a few relevant facts about electric vehicles (EVs) in Yukon :
1. EVs require less than 1/3 as much energy to operate as a conventional vehicle due to the efficiency of the engine/drivetrain. In an EV 77-82% of the energy goes to drive the wheels compared to 16-25% in a gasoline-powered vehicle. A conventional vehicle engine wastes 2/3 to 3/4 of the energy in the gasoline/diesel it consumes. This is dissipated as heat. Sure it is great to have some of that during the cold months of winter. Unfortunately the engine is always producing that heat, even when you don't need it.
2. Over 90% of our electricity on the WAF grid comes from renewable Hydro. In MOST years we have surplus Hydro from June through October. So electric vehicles can use 100% renewable hydro during this time. During the winter our electriciy mix contains a modest amount of LNG and Diesel generation, so an electric vehicle will be using that mix. However, consider that running an EV even on PURE diesel- or LNG-generated electricity is probably about as energy-efficient as a convenventional gas/diesel vehicle. LNG or Diesel electricity generation is only 45% efficient, and there are some transmission and charging losses getting electricity into the electric vehicle. DESPITE THIS, the efficient EV engine/drive train results in an overall efficiency of around 30% -- still a bit better than a conventional vehicle. Bottom line: An EV is WAAY more energy-efficient most of the time, and at worst is comparable to a conventional vehicle.
3. You can fuel an electric vehicle with electricity from whatever source is available. You can make your own fuel at home with renewable solar, wind, or micro-hydro power -- and you can store it in your vehicle's battery as it is produced. Compare this with fossil fuels....anybody have a refinery in their backyard or on their roof?
4. Most EVs are, and will be, charged at home most of the time. However there is a need for public chargers for travelers and some commuters.
5. Production of an EV requires more energy and has a larger carbon footprint than for a similar conventional vehicle due to the integrated battery pack. However operating an EV on renewable electricity rapidly offsets the extra energy/carbon footprint of battery production when compared to operating a gasoline/diesel vehicle. Moreover, when batteries have deteriorated enough to be unsuitable for use in a vehicle they can still be used for other applications such as home energy storage.
6. EVs operate just fine in the cold weather. Yes their range is reduced. So is the range in a conventional vehicle. In an EV you don't have much waste heat, so you need to use energy from the propulsion battery to provide cabin heat, defrost etc.
7. TEMPORARY incentives like free charging and rebates for purchasing EVs are intended to increase the speed of EV adoption. Manufacturers and dealers are very comfortable with money to be made from selling/servicing the current crop of conventional vehicles and they have no reason to move towards EVs unless governments and/or consumers force them to. To begin with EVs were/are relatively expensive but that is changing rapidly and price parity with similar conventional vehicles is expected within 5 years. Unfortunately, price-parity starts with high-priced luxury segments and works its way down to economy models. Incentives will accelerate this process by nudging manufacturers to increase R&D and production of EVs in all segments.
8. EVs here currently are not paying road taxes on gasoline or electricity. This is also a good incentive to encourage adoption. Eventually EVs will pay road taxes, most logically based on some combination of weight/distance driven/electricity used for charging.
9. Right now EVs are being purchased here by early adopters who believe they are better overall (especially for energy/environment reasons) than conventional vehicles. They are obviously not just looking for the cheapest car they can find in a particular class. Encouraging the early adopters is an important temporary measure to overcome the local hurdles, such as the reluctance of dealers to get involved. It is important to have affordable new and used EVs for lower-income buyers as well, but these are not going to appear until production costs are reduced by higher volumes, and there are more new cars around that can become available as used ones.
10. EVs are not THE solution to reduce global CO2 emissions, but they can be an important part of the solution. Of course we need to reduce our overall use of energy-hungry vehicles.

Up 16 Down 7

Juniper Jackson on May 12, 2019 at 10:26 am

There is so much money in environmental change that everyone is buying into the WHOLE picture. Al Gore, who started the entire climate 'warming' made more than 314 million dollars out of the scare tactics..the world is coming to an end in 2012.. then 2015..nothing happened except climate warming was revealed as a hoax..so they rebranded it as climate change and the world is going to end. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is kind of a brainless woman with no education who declared at a woman's march the world will end in 12 years..I can not believe the numbers of people that bought into that. https://www.axios.com/climate-change-scientists-comment-ocasio-cortez-12-year-deadline-c4ba1f99-bc76-42ac-8b93-e4eaa926938d.html
So, do i believe in climate change? yes..I see it and live with it.. do i think forcing people to buy cars that depend on diesel to fuel the electricty to run them is going to fix anything? No.. do I believe driving gas prices through the roof is going to change anything? No..what that's going to change is only the people with money will have nice vehicles, campers, RVs, further segregating the rich from the upper poor and poor. Do I believe sending billions of dollars to South America, China, India is going to do anything? HELL no.. do I believe the UN is going to suck the world dry with climate fear? You bet. Hogarth in BC said if you want to drive then take a mortgage out on your house.. Nothing will change the climate situation as long as it's about money and not the climate.

Up 5 Down 4

Wilf Carter on May 11, 2019 at 5:12 pm

I just talked to family in Europe and in winter months it is short haul drives with electric cars mostly in a city. Again it is battery issues. Batteries that will work in winter and long hauls with dangerous chemicals or other factors.

Up 4 Down 6

Wilf Carter on May 11, 2019 at 5:09 pm

Martin you do not understand Canada and the US. We did have government support for the combine engine as you comment. In fact governments in Canada and US were against it because of horse market would die. I grew up in a family that was involved in horses. In 1950 they got involved in a GM dealership. Their letter head read,' trading in horses with good teeth'. Martin you run a business.

Up 5 Down 4

Dietmar Hatzenbichler on May 11, 2019 at 2:25 pm

Has anybody looked into fuel cells?

Non of the cons that electric cars have (huge range, no problem in cold climate). They also have no pollution at all. There are commercial vehicles like the Toyota Mirai available and there are small scale Hydrogen production plants available that would be perfect for our smaller communities. Besides that it would benefit the Canadian economy as most of the worlds top Hydrogen companies are based in Canada.

Yes, efficiency is slightly less because of conversion from power to Hydrogen in electrolysis and Hydrogen to power in the fuel cell but it can help in terms of excess energy, to balance peak power and act as a battery in Yukon's electric grid. Communities could potentially keep their electricity running even if there is a breakdown in the distribution lines. I could keep going but then my post will get too long.
Think about it !

Up 9 Down 11

Frank Michigan on May 11, 2019 at 1:24 pm

I wish all the negative people would be quiet.
A service for a prius hybrid is every 15,000 km and they do last a while and work here in our winter conditions. And you will save money and there is a tax deduction for a new purchase.

Why not start with a prius or equivalent and then go to a full ev if you want.
All the big trucks and low mileage vehicles around town demonstrate that most people do not care and are just making the world a worse place for their children and grandchildren.

Up 9 Down 14

Your car was probably subsidized on May 11, 2019 at 6:52 am

Unless you drive a Honda, or a certain make of Ford pickup, your vehicle was subsidized. And that doesn't include the GM and Chrysler bailout of 2009 to the tune of $13+ billion dollars (some of which has been repaid). Subsidies for automakers have been in place for years - and billions more for oil and gas producers - so don't get too up in arms about subsidies for electric vehicles.

Up 14 Down 0

Jim on May 10, 2019 at 9:28 pm

@Martin, I guess this may be where the split in subsidizing the EV industry will be for people. The ones that are purchasing them are more than happy for their government cheque to reimburse them a portion of their vehicle costs. The ones that can’t afford a new vehicle, but know that their hard earned wages are being taxed in some extent to pay for the person who can afford a new Tesla.
You mentioned the subsidies given to the oil and gas industry but fail to mention that they contributed approx $13 billion to the Canadian economy in 2017 alone. I’m sure you being a business person would think this is a pretty good investment in what actually is mostly tax breaks rather than free money. Maybe you can find out how much the EV and windmills and solar subsidies have contributed to the Canadian economy.
As I’ve previously stated, I have no doubt that electric cars are the path to the future. But let it take its natural course. You didn’t see the government sending Henry Ford’s customers a cheque for his cars did you? As for the roads and their maintenance, every gallon of gas has a road tax on it. As gas consumption is reduced, that road tax money will have to come from some place. Higher taxes of course. Investing in technology is one thing; subsidizing the sale of a retail product is another. Giving free electricity for a vehicle, but charging for it to let’s say heat your house or light your house seems just wrong

Up 20 Down 6

North_of_60 on May 10, 2019 at 1:57 pm

@Fink, if you want to buy an EV that's your choice. However there is no justification for the rest of us taxpayers subsidizing your vehicle purchase.
Most of us drive older vehicles and can't afford a new one.
Explain why the poor people of Canada should finance your vehicle choice.

Up 10 Down 4

Brett on May 10, 2019 at 1:22 pm

There are a number of EVs in Whitehorse already, mostly used Nissan Leafs that can be picked up from down south, but I know there's a local with a shiny new Tesla Model 3. I have seen one of the Leafs tooling around at -35 so they're clearly usable for at least short trips.

This is a matter of "priming the pump" and seeing just how much use these stations get. As more Yukoners are exposed to the technology, more people will find this as a workable alternative.

If there's enough uptake, we can start planning infrastructure to support it. If there's no uptake we don't have to worry about further investment.

Up 9 Down 18

Martin Lehner on May 10, 2019 at 12:39 pm

@Jim: "But I’m not sure why the taxpayers should pay for anyone to buy an EV." Because the taxpayer paid for the internal combustion engine industry to sell cars. Who paid for the roads ? Who pays the $3.3 Billion annual subsidies currently handed out to the oil and gas industry ? I would argue that it's not fair to NOT subsidize the EV industry so it can get its legs underneath it.

In addition, there are environmental benefits that save us all money in the long run. It's kind of saying that $1 spent on education saves $5 in the criminal justice system 20 years later. We want to push EVs and other "green-tech" because it reduces the pollution that we'll eventually need to deal with otherwise.

Up 6 Down 25

Fink on May 9, 2019 at 10:55 pm

Canada needs to move quickly on its transition from gas engines to EVs. Good job on the federal government’s EV rebate (for details, see e.g.: https://www.hydrogasnews.com/2019/05/federal-government-rebates-on-electric.html).
Too bad Ontario had to elect Doug Ford. The future of Canadian energy policy can’t be coherent with out a coherent Ontario. Scrapping provincial financial incentives for EV car purchasers is running in the wrong direction.

Up 9 Down 13

It's an evolution on May 9, 2019 at 4:17 pm

In Europe, where gas is expensive and roads often narrow, EVs have become common. The first charging stations were publicly-financed, but now the fast-charging stations are commercial - often at grocery stores and yeah, even petrol stations. And at some point, homes will be wired for overnight EV charging - at $.12 per kwh, an average EV owner will pay $540/year for electricity to charge a vehicle (Yukon Energy charges slightly more, approx $.14/kwh). Of course they are not for everyone, but they will soon be a real alternative for a lot of drivers.
An autotrader.ca article has a cost comparison of electricity vs gas https://www.autotrader.ca/newsfeatures/20170302/how-much-does-it-really-cost-to-charge-that-electric-vehicle/

Up 32 Down 4

Jim on May 9, 2019 at 1:23 pm

@Mick, Yes, this is an over priced publicity exercise. That’s part of the point. I don’t think anyone doubts the value of EV vehicles. Most of us know that they will work in the North with some reduction in capacity. But I’m not sure why the taxpayers should pay for anyone to buy an EV. If your conscience doesn’t make you go that way, I don’t think the rest of the public should assist you financially as they drive around in their old car. If the only way EVs can out pace gas vehicles is by giving them huge rebates to purchase and free “fuel”, does that not question their validity?
The conversion will take place and the market place will dictate the rate with charging stations charging by the KW or however, just the same as your local gas station, and manufacturers building cars at competitive prices. It’s already happening in the south. Also keep in mind as others have said, we need a bunch of charging stations and a stable power resource. But, as we see too often, the government needs to waste money like this for votes.

Up 8 Down 24

Mick on May 9, 2019 at 9:26 am

@ Jim

Yes, it is a 'publicity exercise'. That is the whole point! Install charging stations, get media coverage, start the discussion, normalize the use of EVs in the north.

EVs will run just fine here and make sense for a large portion of every day drivers. Like with any new technology, the Luddites will come out swinging and frothing at the mouth against it but eventually fade into the background.

As more people port over to hybrids and EVs prices will drop (I'd like to see GOC and YG cash incentives to consumers buying them) a decade or 2 from now they will be the norm and it is for the better.

Up 27 Down 3

My Opinion on May 8, 2019 at 9:22 pm

They did this same thing in the Lower Mainland. People with 100,000 Teslas would like to drive them somewhere so Tesla put a bank of chargers in Hope. Good idea right??? Well on a weekend there is only one place to go so they all drive out to Hope. Big cluster, 8 hr waits to get to the chargers. Cars left behind. Cars towed home. I have a buddy that lives in Hope. Good for the bars and restaurants though, Haha.

Up 23 Down 6

My Opinion on May 8, 2019 at 9:17 pm

So the level 2 chargers take about 4 hours, where do you go in the mean time? Do you have to wait there? Are there a couple of other people lined up by this time? Do you get towed away if it is charged and you still are not back?

The level 3 chargers take 20 min. this is almost worse. That is a long time to just sit there. Can you imagine if it took that long at the gas station? There would be a riot.

There is aprox 30,000 vehicles in the Yukon. At 20 min per charge (Level 3) you could only charge 24 in an 8 hr day. You would need about 1500 chargers. There isn't even anywhere near 1500 parking spots to put them. Total pipe dream.

Up 24 Down 4

My Opinion on May 8, 2019 at 9:08 pm

I would like to know who is going to sell you these vehicles and service them. The local dealers are not going to hire an industrial electrician to work on one every six months. There are no economies of scale here.

Up 34 Down 7

My Opinion on May 8, 2019 at 9:06 pm

We have maxed out our green Hydro capacity. Anything we add to the grid in the winter is produced by Hydro Carbons. This is a bunch of Liberal Navel Gazing. Waste of money. Each of those chargers could have covered one year of funding for the Tram along the waterfront. Election can't come soon enough. Bye, Bye Larry.

Up 22 Down 2

Jim on May 8, 2019 at 6:01 pm

Martin Lehner; congrats on your purchase of your EV. This is where I hope this conversion from fossil fuels to EV autos would start. Commercial vehicles for service vans, cars, cabs, delivery such as couriers that drive around all day can make the most of these vehicles. I think the frustration is that almost all EV manufacturers are building and promoting for private use. I have seen no small vans or pickups for commercial use. They are the people that put the most miles on during a day. Usually all around town so they don’t reach maximum distant. Also getting only 3 charging stations for over 350,000 and giving the power away is just a publicity exercise.

Up 15 Down 18

Martin Lehner on May 8, 2019 at 2:36 pm

Too many misconceptions and misinformation floating around when it comes to EVs. Spoken by a lot of people who have never seen one, driven one or owned one. As I mentioned in a previous comment, anyone who wishes to come check an EV out, Tangerine Technology has one:

https://www.facebook.com/tangerinetechnology/posts/2659547827393947

Up 15 Down 17

Bob on May 8, 2019 at 12:12 pm

How effective is this $120,000/station subsidy compared to other possible subsidies in reducing GHG emissions as fast as possible? To address climate change, we need to reduce reliance on single occupancy vehicles (even EVs) and start using buses, bikes and walking more often. Where is the subsidy for encouraging cycling, transit use and other forms of sustainable transportation?
We need a paradigm shift here, folks. EVs emit somewhat less GHGs over their lifetime than an internal combustion engine vehicle, which is great, but subsidizing EVs is notoriously expensive per kg of GHGs avoided. It was about $500/tonne in Ontario (before Ford cut it). Compare this to many other options like a carbon tax at $50/tonne (in 2022). Let's let the carbon tax provide the incentive for people and businesses to get into EVs and spend the precious incentive dollars on measures that will actually have a much bigger impact like building better pathways for bikes and pedestrians and investing in/subsidizing public transit.
For example, 360K would buy about 500 free transit passes for a year, build 3.6 km of paved multi-use paths or fund 6 large (20-bike) secure parking shelters. There is no time left for these kinds of ineffective half-measures around EVs or similar measures that are popular with voters but have low GHG reduction impact per dollar spent.

Up 36 Down 6

Really? on May 8, 2019 at 12:00 pm

Is this really the best usage of taxpayer money? I can think of a lot more items that should take precedence over this purchase...but that's just me.

Up 46 Down 7

Brian on May 8, 2019 at 8:37 am

Huh, as hypocrites usually go, this is a nice example of “dirty Clean vehicle” all 3 Hydro Electric reservoirs are low, which means Hydro Electricity is not being produced at near needed volumes. So, all the Diesel and LNG (from FRACKED well sites) generators are churning away.
So how is it clean energy when your charging your electric car from a power source supplied by Fossil Fuels?
It’s not.

Your better off to purchase a efficient Gasoline car for half the price.

Up 46 Down 6

Mr M on May 8, 2019 at 7:28 am

I have been told by Yukon Electric, YG and The City we have to start conserving energy and here they are paying $368,000.00 + for 3 charging stations. Does the consumer of this power have to pay for it or does the citizens of the Territory pay again? Make up your minds are we conserving energy or not. Also how many electric cars are there in the Yukon? Maybe they can waste another $100,000.00 or more for a study to be done. Just sit here and shake my head.

Up 37 Down 3

Photo op on May 7, 2019 at 10:02 pm

Does it not make one wonder how and why the locations for the new 3 charging stations are being located? Most urban centres are locating them in areas where there is large public traffic, such as mall, parks, hotels. We put them in government parking lots (which barely have any public parking), museum parking lot (at least it’s on the highway, but no directional signage), Mount Lorne waste management site (no idea what the deal is on this). Now the new ones at the Carcross learning Centre and Yukon Visitor Centre. Hopefully will have access for the public. And then there’s the one at the Inovation Center. Who exactly is this one meant for? Is it because this is the new YG pet project? If it was for the college, it should be up at the college where it may get used in the future. Or are they picking these locations by the 11 people who have bought electric cars. At over $100,000 per unit and free power, not sure how many electric car users the taxpayer can support. Nothing against electric cars, but pay your own way.

Up 30 Down 6

Max Mack on May 7, 2019 at 9:50 pm

This "pilot" is set up to show that EVs can succeed in the North, particularly in Whitehorse. In other words, this is a faux study meant to sway public opinion.

What the story doesn't tell you is that EV users already plug in all day on the public dime via "level 1" charging. So, when they aren't using the "level 2" or "level 3" charging stations, also free, they are parked wherever there is a 120v receptacle to keep their EV topped up during the cold winter months. All of it paid for by you and me, one way or the other. Next will be the EV purchase subsidies, 'cause nothing makes an "environmentalist" crow like getting free money to show off their virtue.

If EV demand increases as the bureaucrats hope for, you can count on a significant increase in electrical consumption - with a corresponding increase in rates.
These faux environmentalists need to take their masks off.

Up 18 Down 8

Martin Lehner on May 7, 2019 at 9:06 pm

@Pikka: We have an EV that we use for commercial purposes. Feel free to come down and check it out, if you like, you're more than welcome to. There's a LOT of misconceptions about EVs, including how they work in the cold. I'd be happy to help correct those.

Up 33 Down 7

North_of_60 on May 7, 2019 at 7:14 pm

"The three charging stations can be used free of charge to the public."
Yet another example of LIB cronyism to only benefit the affluent people who can afford electric vehicles. Why shouldn't these people pay for the electricity they use to charge their EV? This is in addition to the generous subsidies buyers of EVs receive from the taxpayers who struggle to afford gasoline for their old cars.

Up 15 Down 8

Mick on May 7, 2019 at 6:17 pm

@ Pikka
Have a read. The technology works here
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/electric-vehicle-yukon-winter-1.4975075

Up 16 Down 7

Groucho d'North on May 7, 2019 at 5:49 pm

I am pleased that this experiment is being made, we won't know unless we try it out. That being said, why not go all in on one -or all - of these charging stations to be solar powered? An autonomious source of powering an electric road vehicle in this environment year round and documenting all the pros and cons in a real world application would be a worthy project for Carbon Tax funding I think.

Up 34 Down 7

Guncache on May 7, 2019 at 5:15 pm

Photo op Larry with his skewed liberal statistics

Up 31 Down 14

Pikka on May 7, 2019 at 4:49 pm

The time to test these is in January when it’s minus forever and let’s see how they hold up. Doubt they could make it to the next charging station, technology is not there for this climate but we will keep throwing money at it.

Up 29 Down 2

Lead? on May 7, 2019 at 2:53 pm

So will we see the government buy more than its one lone 3-year old EV now in response to the market-based incentives of its own carbon tax? Or is it just more of the same for your own fleet?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.