Photo by Whitehorse Star
Yukon Party MLA Wade Istchenko
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Yukon Party MLA Wade Istchenko
A Yukon Party MLA is suggesting the Yukon government could lower the cost of purchasing land – if it wanted to.
A Yukon Party MLA is suggesting the Yukon government could lower the cost of purchasing land – if it wanted to.
Wade Istchenko, the MLA for Kluane, made that assertion last Thursday during question period.
“It comes as no surprise to Yukoners that the cost of land has increased, as well as everything else,” he said.
Several weeks ago, he wrote to Energy, Mines and Resources Minister John Streicker about the price of land sold by the government.
In his April 11 letter to Istchenko, Streicker said, “Land sold through the Rural Residential Land Application policy, used for people seeking land for their primary residence, cannot be sold for any less than the appraised value as per the Lands Act.”
However, Istchenko told the house, “The Lands Act actually allows for a fair amount of discretion to setting of land prices. In the minister’s confidential briefing note from last fall on land availability, it outlines how the government sets the price.
“It says that the Government of Yukon — and I quote: ‘… sells lots for a value between development cost and the appraised market value.’
“So, it clearly appears that there is an ability for the minister to set the price by regulation somewhere between the cost of development and appraised value,” Istchenko said.
“So, will the minister consider using the cost of development, instead of the appraised value, to make the land more affordable for Yukoners?”
The government stopped selling land at development cost many years ago, thus raising the prices for buyers.
Streicker said he has checked with his staff to see if he has the discretion Istchenko said he has.
“I will share with the member opposite that, when the letter came to me and the department provided me with the draft response, I asked them to go back and review it a few times, because I wanted to make sure,” Streicker said.
“So, I did already pose the question about whether this was a legislated requirement or not.
“But, sure, with respect to the request that is being posed here on the floor of the legislative assembly, I am happy to check back with the department again to see whether there is another possibility.
“At all times, we want to make housing more affordable for Yukoners,” he said. “So, if there is an avenue that is available to us, I would be happy to explore it.”
One of the reasons he asked his officials the question several times “is because the costs looked high,” the minister said
“When I asked what the difference was, it was that there had not been an appraisal in recent times, and I was told very specifically that it was a legislative requirement.”
Istchenko persisted.
“So, the Lands Act allows for the development of regulations to set prices at which land can be sold. Using market appraisal to set the value of raw land in rural Yukon is keeping prices high and it definitely limits the ability of Yukoners to access land and the ability for our communities to grow and create jobs,” he pointed out.
“What steps is the minister taking to ensure that land is available and affordable for Yukoners, especially those in rural Yukon?”
Streicker persevered with his answer.
“I asked for comparisons with other properties nearby, and I was given a map showing all of those over time. So, I actually did dive into this question.
“We are working at all times to find the lowest cost that we can for Yukoners, because we recognize that there is a crunch on housing,” Streicker said.
“We have invested very heavily. I believe that in this year’s budget alone, it’s $26 million in lot development — about half in Whitehorse and half in our rural communities.”
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (11)
Up 7 Down 1
Anie on Apr 28, 2022 at 9:54 am
Economy? raises some very valid points, and they are seldom raised in any discussions about the hugely all-encompassing "affordable housing" umbrella. It's past time for us to determine exactly what we mean by "affordable housing'. Is it the right of everyone to own a bungalow? Or Are we doing away with the concept of starter homes? Do we think young people should be encouraged to start small, perhaps renting or condo? Or do we think affordable means basic shelter? Maybe something in between bungalow ownership and basic shelter? Is "affordable" comfortable accommodation for the elderly - and maybe we should be aware that if we lower the cost of new homes, then we lower the value of homes that those elderly were counting on to pay for that accommodation, it's such a complex problem, with so many committees and special interest groups, but we aren't going to get any real solutions until we first agree on the definition of "affordable housing"
Up 5 Down 12
economy? on Apr 27, 2022 at 8:14 am
If land prices are lowered then the overall value of a home will also be reduced. if this happens enough times all land and property value will fall. there will be thousands of people who bought a house in the last few years that would loose 100s of thousands of dollars. How would you feel if your largest investment was suddenly worth 1/3 less than the mortgage you owe? I'm guessing people don't see that because i would hate to think people are ok with their friends, family and neighbors losing their livelihoods which leads to bankruptcy, empty houses and finally economic recession. then you will need a government stimulus to keep us from entering into another great depression. Of course I'm sure the Y.P is aware of this concept but guess they don't mind the economy being ruined of course this sure sounds good and gets the votes. Although I guess if there's enough foreclosures then there will be plenty of houses available for cheap.
Up 8 Down 2
Woodcutter on Apr 26, 2022 at 7:30 pm
Who else, is like sheepchaser, and thinks property taxes are based on market value?
Looks like someone couldn't get it together to own their own.
Up 18 Down 6
Jim on Apr 25, 2022 at 7:03 pm
The value of lots should have stayed with the cost of development rather than market value. But as it’s turned into a cash cow for YG and the City(s) it will most likely never return. But what surprises me is people bitching because Wade suggested it. So by that analogy because the Yukon Party and NDP did similar when they were in power then how dare they question the ruling Liberals. Hopefully you realize just how dumb that sounds. Maybe you would rather the ruling party just governs however they see fit, no questions asked. Oh wait, we’ve had that throughout the pandemic. If any politician of any political stripe can think of ways to make housing cheaper we should explore every idea.
Up 12 Down 10
Politico on Apr 25, 2022 at 6:14 pm
Curious that the YP always comes up with these ideas when they aren't paying the bills. How long were they in power?
Up 24 Down 2
Hobo on Apr 25, 2022 at 5:15 pm
If the YG would want to produce affordable lots, they would make lots for prefab buildings (so-call 14x64 trailers). Those lots similar to Arkel would work for entry level buyers and provde relief to the market. There are lots of those development in BC and the praires, why not here?
Up 12 Down 7
Nathan Living on Apr 25, 2022 at 5:09 pm
I think John and Wade are both doing their jobs.
Whitehorse Housing is very messed up with respect to the cost of a home.
Yes, lower the price of lots out of town by providing roads and power and give lower priced options for people.
Up 12 Down 7
bonanzajoe on Apr 25, 2022 at 4:37 pm
China can afford the high prices. They're buying up land like it was halloween candy.
Up 64 Down 18
BnR on Apr 25, 2022 at 3:32 pm
Curious why Wade and the boys didn't change the legislation when they were in power? Land here has always been expensive in relative terms.
Up 34 Down 35
Sheepchaser on Apr 25, 2022 at 2:57 pm
Making rural lots cheaper is a double-edged sword. Weakens the potential tax base of small communities while increasing the use of local services. Cheap land often leads to cut corners and smaller investments made on improvements. Then more associated costs when government ends up having to handle the fallout.
How low-cost is low enough? Given all the lots in the Yukon that are covered in junk and rotting buildings from the era of cheap land… how low do you want to go?
Maybe Wade can go on a fact-finding tour of all the ‘unofficial junkyards’ in the Kluane area and come back with some information on how much those would cost to get them halfway acceptable for resale. We can add a contaminated lot lottery to the yearly mud bog ritual. Side benefit to Wade’s constituents… lower appraisal values and resale prices on their existing homes.
A financial savant this guy is not.
Up 25 Down 24
Mitch Holder on Apr 25, 2022 at 2:15 pm
When I was a kid, my drunk neighbours would come back from camp, throw a party and buy a lot at New Constabulary Beach Subdivision. Us kids thought this would be our fate. The price went up over 1000% since then. That said, I should earn an average of $125.00 an hour.
I suggest you ensure civilians take priority over government workers and civil servants for that land and those "so called" houses you are building. Good investment in reducing future crime rates.