Whitehorse Daily Star

Yachting diners paid $300 to see YP ministers

Liberal Leader Sandy Silver came out swinging during the first question period of the 2014 spring legislative sitting, asking why the premier spent an evening in Vancouver promoting the Yukon Party rather than the Yukon Territory.

By Ainslie Cruickshank on March 26, 2014

Liberal Leader Sandy Silver came out swinging during the first question period of the 2014 spring legislative sitting, asking why the premier spent an evening in Vancouver promoting the Yukon Party rather than the Yukon Territory.

On the Sunday night before the annual Mining Roundup conference began in Vancouver in late January, Premier Darrell Pasloski and ministers Scott Kent and Currie Dixon were aboard the Pride of Vancouver, a chartered yacht which took them on a dinner cruise around the Burrard Inlet.

The cruise was a Yukon Party fund-raiser aimed, according to Silver, at inviting the mining industry to a "Yukon Party ‘Party'” and offering an "exclusive opportunity to connect with Premier Pasloski and Ministers Kent and Dixon.”

The party sold tickets for $300 apiece.

"The premier and his ministers were travelling on the taxpayers' dollar,” Silver noted during question period.

"They were supposed to be spending their time working on behalf of Yukoners, not raising money for their re-election fund.

"Now if the premier doesn't see a problem with that, we have a bigger problem. Our exploration industry is in a tailspin. The premier and his ministers were supposed to be spending their time trying to reverse this trend.”

In response to Silver's questioning, the premier noted he and the ministers use the mining conference to meet with companies doing business in the territory to ensure the "communication lines” are kept open.

"We're also continuing to focus on promoting this as a very strong investment opportunity for people to invest in both the exploration industry and in the extraction industry as well,” he said.

"There is a tremendous amount of work that goes into the mineral Roundup as there is for PDAC or Cambridge House.

"The days are long, they begin early, they go well into the night, and I would commend not only the ministers but their staff for the hard work that they do,” Pasloski continued.

"We are not on 24/7, and there is an opportunity for personal time when we are in Vancouver, and that, Mr. Speaker, is not unheard of at all.”

The amount of money the Yukon Party raised from its visitors that evening was unavailable.

Speaking with reporters following his budget speech, Pasloski said the yacht cruise was organized by the party, not the government, and any time the ministers were involved, it was on personal time.

"If the leader of the Liberal party drives to Whitehorse and bills the government as part of his expense to come here but then does party business or comes to a fund-raiser, how is that any different?” the premier asked.

Other topics raised during the opening day of the legislature include economic certainty and the impact of ongoing lawsuits between the government and First Nations, the Peel River watershed land use plan, cleanup of contaminated sites, and lobbying legislation.

The NDP's Justice critic, Lois Moorcroft raised the issue of lobbying legislation.

She asked if the government "will join governments across the country and bring in lobbying legislation so Yukoners know who is influencing the decisions that affect them every day?”

The premier responded: "As I have said many times in this house, I don't think that we need to be asking such groups as the (Yukon) Anti-Poverty Coalition, the Salvation Army, FASSY, outfitters, WTAY, TIAY, AYC, AFY, municipalities, YCS, Challenge, Canadian Cancer Society — they are just some examples — school councils — should they all be registered lobbyists?

"We don't believe that they should be. We believe that there is an opportunity for groups and individuals to talk to the government, to their representative MLAs, to ensure that their concerns are heard and addressed, and we'll continue to do so.”

But it's not the community and volunteer organizations the NDP is concerned about. Rather, it's the paid lobbyists whose job it is to influence government policy in favour of whoever they're representing – large multinational corporations, unions, trade organizations etc., Moorcroft said.

She noted lobbying is a legitimate activity within a democracy, just not behind closed doors.

Comments (27)

Up 3 Down 9

Nonsense on Apr 5, 2014 at 12:00 am

Now where did that guy ever get a number like that for the funeral trip?! Way to try to make the public freak out over a number you clearly made up. Do you people realize the amount of money drained from the taxpayers account from the other parties for travel and fundraising? Your ploy worked to a point, Sandy. You made big headlines and got a bunch of people up in arms. The same type of people, I might add, that have nothing better to do than sit on a computer all day and review news articles without at least trying to educate themselves before providing their "valued advice" on a matter. Educate yourselves people, stop listening to drivel, and try focusing on the good things going on with our government. Where do you think we would be if the NDP was still in charge? Probably in Alberta, in my case.

Lifetime Yukoner who wouldn't be able to afford to stay in my hometown. Wisen up Yukon! You've got a good thing going on here!

Up 7 Down 3

Alexander Paladin on Apr 4, 2014 at 1:00 pm

Liberial, look around, the territory's economy has collapsed and the Yukon Party is solely responsible.

Now they are spending our money recklessly (again), with no planning, to dupe the public in the runup to an election.

This yachting scandal - and scandalous is precisely what it is - reflects all that is wrong with the Yukon Party's approach to governing.

If you have $300 for party coffers, you can meet with the minister to discuss business. In Vancouver. On a yacht. With champagne and fresh salmon.

Heck, give them enough cash, and they'll scupper a democratic land-use planning exercise for you.

This isn't good governance. Far from it.

Problem is, we've been without good governance for so long that folks like you have forgotten what it looks like.

Up 14 Down 10

Liberial do not Understand How Government opereate on Apr 3, 2014 at 6:48 am

It is good that the liberals are not in power the economy would sink and the last person leaving please turn out the lights. The former leader of the Yukon Liberal Party used go to round up and had an understanding of how the Yukon has to market its-self to the world. All this noise just turns off the truth of how government works and what is has to do to enable the economy in the Yukon to grow.

When an employee or elected official is on their own time it's their business what they do. People go on these trips work very hard and give 12 or more hours a day when they are on the road getting home 1:00 am and going to work next day. Second, the liberals are sending a bad message to the investment world who is creating jobs in the Yukon we don't want you or your money. Wrong move.

Up 17 Down 13

Rolf Cummings on Apr 2, 2014 at 1:56 pm

I was on the cruise with a few coworkers.

We had a very nice time and there were no promises made to us. We discussed issues like consultation and the Peel but really just chatted and got to know the government representatives.

People from all over the world who are interested in Yukon mineral resources were there.

We will support the Yukon Party because it supports our industry.

Up 18 Down 25

Bored troll on Mar 31, 2014 at 2:00 pm

Good grief! They went on a big city swayer not like every single party in the past hasn't done. Not like 90% of all the useless courses and conferences YG employees go on. Get real Mr. Silver you likely chew through that in one trip from Dodge in your personal vehicle down to the big smoke. Folks the gene pool is small so be at one with the school yard spats.

Up 22 Down 10

north_of_60 on Mar 31, 2014 at 8:21 am

This is nothing compared with the $50,000++ they p!$$ed away flying to Africa for a funeral, which had absolutely nothing to do with the Yukon.

Just another political boondoggle from the carpetbaggers riding high on the taxpayers dime.

Up 17 Down 5

J on Mar 30, 2014 at 9:18 am

All political parties conduct fund raising

Everyone on a paid or company funded trip is allowed free time.

However as politicians I believe you are subjected to a higher code of ethics, when you choose to be in a leadership position. Perceptions from the general public is equally important in a government leadership position. However it is understandable that one can't always ensure everybody is happy from all angles.

My concerns with this is the fact that they are advertising to those with money, you can have our time and company. There are people in a specific profession that does what our society views as such. To lobby for your cause and your party is normal however to do some outside of your area is questionable. Why wouldn't one fundraise in their own area, one would be led to think perhaps you don't think of us as the people you really need to sell yourself and your party to as reputable leaders?

Up 23 Down 16

Stella on Mar 29, 2014 at 9:41 am

All political parties fund raise. Silver is treading on dangerous ground. I remember the Federal Liberal leader coming to town and doing a fundraiser with Silver. I bet he charged tax payers for his trip down from Dawson.

Up 23 Down 14

Lets be serious on Mar 29, 2014 at 12:50 am

Any idiot who paid $300 to meet with these intellectual giants of Canadian politics deserves our pity not outrage; and, a refund.

I think more than likely what ended up happening was the Spaz and his merry band of minions were the ones paying the $300 to get anyone to talk to them.

Up 8 Down 4

Faroite on Mar 29, 2014 at 12:16 am

"Avoid all potential or perceived situations of conflict." Thanks Dear Charles...That is the magic phrase.

However, in the Yukon, and at all level of government, no one feels it should apply. That is because it is overlooked since we don't have a large population and we all face the issue at one time or another in our life up here.

Up 20 Down 13

bobby bitman on Mar 28, 2014 at 10:35 am

My 'gripe' is that Darrel and friends showed up at a mining conference and promptly offered intimate access to themselves, top Yukon Territory decision makers, to anyone who gave $300 to the Yukon Party.

They offered this to the mining community, their friends.

Maybe those of us concerned about the Peel and other issues that are less popular to the Yukon Party should rent a hotel room and offer Darrel $300. He sure does not want to meet with anyone otherwise. It works for the mining industry! I'll bring the champagne, you bring the caviar, we all bring our cheque books and maybe they'll show up and listen.

But I doubt it. This cruise was just an opportunity for the mining industry participants to kiss Darrel's ring and demonstrate their loyalty to the party. Darrel would charge far more to those who are disloyal, if he would even stoop to meet with them at all. He has learned well from his master puppeteer Steve.

Up 17 Down 12

Dear Charles ... on Mar 28, 2014 at 9:49 am

Our elected officials need to be held to a higher standard and that means they need to be completely transparent, and avoid all potential or perceived situations of conflict.

Before heading down on YG business they should have asked themselves ... "How would this look to the public - the Yukon taxpayer?"

Up 34 Down 3

Doug Rutherford on Mar 28, 2014 at 6:10 am

I have no issue with the fact that the outing was paid for by party funds, and since there was legitimate government business to get them there, the travel and accommodations funding doesn't bother me either.

My question relates to why should anyone have to pay to get access of any type to an elected official? Raising party funds to do what their job entails is improper. And, the argument that this was aimed at people outside the territory does not hold water. Elected officials are supposed to be accessible to anyone who may have an interest in the territory.

It is what they were elected to do, not to raise funds for their party. Under no circumstances should any type of access to any elected member require any type of payment.

Up 13 Down 23

FCO on Mar 28, 2014 at 4:57 am

Shameful, the funds for this 'social' should have been used for a Homeless Shelter.

Up 33 Down 31

Charles on Mar 27, 2014 at 11:16 am

If I understand correctly, the cruise was paid for by YP not tax payers. The only expense to tax payers was the actual trip to Vancouver & accom. We are talking one evening of the ministers time here & as stated they are not expected to work 24/7. If they had sat in hotel room, playing scrabble, the cost to tax payers would be the same. I think anyone who has gone on an employee paid conference has been able to take a free evening for personal time. Political parties aside, just what exactly is the gripe here?

Up 32 Down 16

north_of_60 on Mar 27, 2014 at 9:52 am

Pasloski for Pharmacist

Protect the Peel

Up 26 Down 11

What's next on Mar 27, 2014 at 6:46 am

We'll the Spaz selling access to himself and others on EBay

Up 38 Down 17

Riley on Mar 27, 2014 at 6:45 am

Shamefull

No wonder this government has not dealt honourably with First Nations or voters who want to protect the Peel- they are too busy sucking up to the mining industry!

Up 62 Down 13

Scott Holmes on Mar 27, 2014 at 1:26 am

Pasloski, Kent & Dixon, the 2 Amigos, are always trolling the bogs for money and votes. A reporter would be well advised to follow them on a jaunt to Beijing, Korea, Japan,Germany, France, London or any other far-flung junket. This booze cruise is just the tip of the iceburg when it comes to shmoozing for cash from foreign companies.

Up 49 Down 12

Dyan on Mar 27, 2014 at 1:13 am

I agree with a lot of what Mr. Silver had to say. How come no one is questioning why Mrs. Hanson was down at Roundup for the announcement of the lawsuit against the Government? I am sure this was also on the tax payers dime. Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Up 63 Down 19

Sandy Helland on Mar 26, 2014 at 11:12 pm

Scandalous. Inappropriate expenses billed to Yukon tax payers.

Up 17 Down 26

north_of_60 on Mar 26, 2014 at 11:18 am

That sort of self serving activity on the taxpayers dime is typical of these YP carpetbaggers.

Who do they think they are: Michelle Obama?

Up 51 Down 17

bobby bitman on Mar 26, 2014 at 10:16 am

"a very strong investment opportunity", says Darrel. Yes, $300 to the Yukon Party and you get access to the top elected officials. To all you Yukoners who they are supposed to represent - pay up or P-off. And if you are not singing the Yukon Party tune, they are not listening and you won`t hear back from them.

Up 34 Down 60

oldtimer on Mar 26, 2014 at 9:58 am

Really. If that is all that Mr. Silver has to comment about maybe the Liberals should be looking for a new leader. You sound like your federal leader counterpart making so many silly comments. How many Liberal meetings have you attended over the years as MLA on Yukoner's dollars. Come on Mr. Silver you sound like a small child not invited to the party.

Up 63 Down 12

Are we surprised? on Mar 26, 2014 at 9:25 am

They discount the comments and involvement of "outsiders" when it comes to the Peel but its okay to solicit money from someone not in Yukon if it suits their purpose ... these guys are shameful and have no moral center or ethics.

They will milk the gravy train as much as the can over the next few years because they're history!

Up 65 Down 9

BnR on Mar 26, 2014 at 8:15 am

Our premier also didn't see any issues with travelling around the world to Mandelas funeral on the taxpayer dollar either.

Fat times indeed.

Up 61 Down 10

Brent Slobodin on Mar 26, 2014 at 7:47 am

Duffy, Wallin, Harb, Brazeau, Redford, Kwan. You'd think they would learn from these fine examples.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.