Whitehorse Daily Star

Woman ordered to take gambling counselling

A 52-year-old woman

By Chuck Tobin on January 4, 2017

A 52-year-old woman who was once involved in large commercial properties in the Yukon has been ordered to repay $235,000 of $368,821 in personal income tax she avoided.

Yen Ngoc Tran – also known as Kathy Tran – was ordered last month by Justice Leigh Gower of the Yukon Supreme Court to make monthly payments of $200 until the debt is paid.

Tran was also ordered to take counselling for a gambling addiction, though there was never any evidence of an addiction provided to the court other than Tran’s testimony of an addiction.

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) reported what the judge described in his decision as major discrepancies between the annual income Tran reported in 2007, 2008 and 2009 and her net worth.

In 2007, for instance, Tran reported an annual income of $34,759 – but the CRA found $1.2 million in unreported income, according to the decision.

The decision points out in 2007, Tran owned 75 per cent of the shares in the Bonanza Inn – formerly the Taku Hotel – when it was sold for $776,891.

Tran also purchased an Alexander Street property in Whitehorse the same year for $273,001.

The CRA audit found that while Tran reported an annual income of $34,674 in 2008, the unreported income was $465,730, and in 2009, when she reported an income of $14,939, the unreported income was $413,254, Gower points out in his decision.

The decision also notes Tran owned a residence at 208 Falcon Dr. which had been used as an illegal marijuana grow operation.

She sold the property in 2006 and denied having ever profited from the illegal activity, Gower notes in his decision.

The decision points to various transactions of substantial amounts over the years involving Tran alone or together with one of her three daughters.

In April 2012, for instance, Tran was the sole owner of the Kluane Park Inn in Haines Junction when it sold for a final payout of $521,165, and the inn was mortgage-free at the time.

When Tran and one of her daughters purchased a Vancouver property in June 2012 for $815,000, the payment was made entirely in cash, Gower notes in his decision.

The decision says Tran filed for bankruptcy in 2015, when she reported personal assets worth $800 and a monthly income of $1,500 a month, which quickly dropped to $800.

In November 2016, the Canada Revenue Agency filed its amended proof of claim against Tran for a total of $1,177,806.

The claim was for $368,821 for unpaid income tax for the years 2007, 2008 and 2009, along with a penalty and interest of $808,984, says Gower’s decision.

Gower points out in his decision the guiding principles in cases of failure to pay income tax suggest individuals should not be penalized for bad luck or poor business decisions, that the penalty should not be so harsh that the individual would never recover.

On the other hand, where bankrupts are dishonest or ill-intentioned, the court must turn itself toward the protection of society, he notes.

“At the time the personal income tax debt was incurred, the bankrupt was living an extremely lavish lifestyle, having unaccounted for personal expenditures of over $760,000 in 2007, over $475,000 in 2008, and over $370,000 in 2009.

“The bankrupt has made no efforts whatsoever to pay the personal income tax debt.”

The decision notes the order to repay $235,000 of the uncollected tax amounts to 20 per cent of the total owed Revenue Canada, which is in keeping with similar penalties in B.C. and is in keeping with what Revenue Canada was seeking.

Comments (27)

Up 15 Down 1

CJ on Jan 9, 2017 at 12:21 pm

@Patty O'Brien, I did figure a lot of it was interest and penalties and trying to pay those doesn't comply with the objective of not making it impossible to pay back.

But if the interest and penalties climbed to that point, it suggests that they've been trying to get her attention for awhile. It's one thing to not have the tax money to pull together, it's totally different to ignore or lie to Revenue Canada.

Nobody likes paying taxes. But there's a sense here that she thought her circumstances were exceptional, somehow. Which they are not. 99 percent of us struggle.

I was going to defend her repayment amount on the basis of the interest and penalties, but not that she's really special, because she's a good mom and a hard worker. That's ridiculous.

Up 26 Down 1

ProScience Greenie on Jan 8, 2017 at 9:42 am

So, if you have bad habits you can get a break from the courts for not paying taxes? Might have to give that a try.

Up 20 Down 2

YukonMax on Jan 7, 2017 at 8:36 am

Must be the same lady who tried to sell me a used gas cap for $20.00 after I just filled the RV with over $100.00 worth of gas.

Up 44 Down 2

That Decision and That Judge on Jan 6, 2017 at 9:20 am

That decision puts the proper administration of justice into serious question. Nothing fair here. Justice will not prevail....once again.

Up 13 Down 31

Gerry Desjardins on Jan 6, 2017 at 6:51 am

The real thief here is the govt, over $800,000 in interest charges, I wouldn't pay either.

Up 12 Down 59

Patty O'Brien on Jan 6, 2017 at 6:21 am

I feel sad for Kathy and wish I was there to give her a hug. People need to consider the facts.
I have known Kathy for decades. My daughters played with her daughters, in their home and mine. They went to school together, in Whitehorse and Haines Junction.
They call her lifestyle "lavish"? That's a laugh. Her children were provided for and she was always at her restaurant working. So maybe lavish because they got to eat in her restaurant? They were secure kids who always knew where to find her.
I can only imagine what Revenue Canada ("Revada") have been putting her through. This is our taxpayer dollars on this witch hunt.
Over $800,000 of Ms. Tran's tax bill is PENALTIES and INTEREST.
That's right folks, they have tripled her tax bill.
Thank heavens we have an impartial judiciary. I suggest that Revada has been hounding and "auditing" her for years and they found very little, and that questionable. So they padded it with 300%, usury that would make the Mafia blush. It's scary.
The Judge saw through it. I hope his decision stands because it is fair and maybe now Kathy can be left in peace.

Up 15 Down 5

martin on Jan 5, 2017 at 11:35 pm

To smith: Was your instructor Mr. Gower himself when he was a practicing lawyer in a small office on Main Street? circa 1990's

Up 28 Down 3

jc on Jan 5, 2017 at 9:44 pm

Lynn Black, stop paying your taxes and you may get to go to court before this wonderful judge. Seems to me he has set a precedent.

Up 55 Down 4

smith on Jan 5, 2017 at 3:55 pm

I took a criminal justice course at the college. The instructor who is a lawyer told us the only type of case to never take on is unpaid taxes. He told the students "pay your taxes!" that there is absolutely no way to fight the gov't and get away with it. I wish I was still in the course to ask his views on this.

Up 70 Down 4

Mr. McCandless on Jan 5, 2017 at 3:31 pm

This Yukon decision ranks right up there with the 2 yrs a man(?) was given for bludgeoning to death a young woman who turned him down. Justice is blind and justice does cry out in the Yukon. Who can wake these clowns up?

Up 57 Down 1

BnR on Jan 5, 2017 at 2:49 pm

And she doesn't have to sell one of her properties (or have it seized by RC) why?
Heck of deal, where do I sign up?

Up 60 Down 3

Bob Graham on Jan 5, 2017 at 2:23 pm

After really thinking about this all day, I've decided I'm not going to pay all the taxes I owe every year! I'm going to just report & pay as I feel like, let them come after me if they wish & quote this case as only needing to pay 20% of what I really owe!

Up 58 Down 2

drum on Jan 5, 2017 at 2:11 pm

I have been paying all my taxes since 1967 and ended up owing Revenue Canada a few years ago. They leaned on me by phone and mail until they got every last cent. How has this woman got away with this for so so many years - showing she owned and ran businesses but only showed making $35,000.00 a year. We are all dumb. She should be running courses on how to do it and get away with it. It is embarrassing for a Yukon judge to let her away with never paying it all back!!!!!!!! Fraudsters are obviously welcomed in the Yukon - I am sure we will be having many people with similar mind sets pouring off the plane in Whitehorse when they read this story in the south.

Up 70 Down 2

so frustrating on Jan 5, 2017 at 12:20 pm

...and I get audited on my Northern Living Allowance and have to prove that I lived in the Yukon for the whole year prior (even though I've filed taxes from the Yukon since I started filing taxes and lived here my entire life).

There is something wrong with who they pick and choose...
I think I'm going to stop paying taxes. And obeying the law in general.

Up 52 Down 1

Gayle Moffatt on Jan 5, 2017 at 11:36 am

It is unfortunate that Revenue Canada did not take more effective action in 2012.

Up 64 Down 2

Bob Graham on Jan 5, 2017 at 10:46 am

What an outrageous decision!!! This is one smart lady as she has outwitted the Revenue Canada & the Justice system! I'm ashamed that this can happen.

Up 49 Down 3

James W. Brent on Jan 5, 2017 at 7:41 am

And, $200.00 per month for 1175 months? 98 years?

Up 36 Down 17

Gerry Desjardins on Jan 5, 2017 at 6:46 am

Thomas Brewer did you not see that over $800,000 of that debt is govt interest, that's fraud in itself. The govt has no problem stealing from the people.

Up 71 Down 0

Lynn Black on Jan 4, 2017 at 10:32 pm

Agreed. Good deal on taxes. I paid a lot more in taxes than Ms Tran from 2003 onwards. And probably will continue to do so even with her $200 a month. Retiree on pension and my tax installments are more than $200 month. She should be in jail for fraud.

Up 68 Down 0

jc on Jan 4, 2017 at 9:25 pm

Let's do some simple math - $235,000 paid back at $200.00 per month comes to 97.9 years. Ms. Yen Ngoc Tran is 52 years old so she will be 150 years old when she pays off the debt. And she still sticks the tax payers with $133,000. If I ever default on a bill payment, I want this judge to rule in my case.

Up 59 Down 0

justice is blind on Jan 4, 2017 at 7:45 pm

In a decision which raises questions, a Yukon judge has ruled that an international tax-scam artist currently owing Canada over a million in taxes, will get a very significant slap on the wrist. The scammer is ordered to pay 20% of the taxes owing at $200/month for the next 104 years. The judge's seeing-eye dog may have a dissenting opinion.

Up 48 Down 2

Peter on Jan 4, 2017 at 7:01 pm

Wow, I have lost respect for her. She is a fraud and has a clearly shady past. People all over just making ends meet, and look at her! Well, it was a matter of time, before she was found out. She should leave the Yukon.

Up 50 Down 2

anonymous on Jan 4, 2017 at 6:42 pm

Rewarding someone being fraudulent makes you fraudulent.

Up 10 Down 13

Woodcutter on Jan 4, 2017 at 5:46 pm

Your maths off Thomas it's actually 64% of ghetto tax bill

Up 59 Down 6

Lost in the Yukon on Jan 4, 2017 at 4:21 pm

Is it just me or does this all smell of drug money?

Up 46 Down 9

Dean Larue on Jan 4, 2017 at 4:15 pm

LOCK HER UP - LOCK HER UP - LOCK HER UP
(couldn't resist)

Up 137 Down 7

Thomas Brewr on Jan 4, 2017 at 3:51 pm

Wow, that's some deterrence to avoiding taxes... get caught and receive a 80% discount on what you owe!
and they say crime doesn't pay! It's lucky judges can't be fired by the government.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.