Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Woman fined after officer finds her asleep in vehicle

A Yukon judge has convicted a 36-year-old Whitehorse woman of failing to exercise care and control of a vehicle and sentenced her to a $1,000 fine.

By Gord Fortin on February 1, 2019

A Yukon judge has convicted a 36-year-old Whitehorse woman of failing to exercise care and control of a vehicle and sentenced her to a $1,000 fine.

Judge Michael Cozens convicted and sentenced Michelle Crystal Fred on Wednesday.

This stemmed from an incident on Sept. 2, 2016.

The RCMP responded to a vehicle found on the side of the road with someone sleeping in the driver’s seat.

At the Nov. 9, 2018 trial, the responding officer could not confirm if the car’s transmission had been in park.

The officer knocked on the window to awaken the occupant. Once awake, the occupant was identified as Fred.

The officer reported that she was confused and had trouble waking up. The officer could smell alcohol on Fred.

Alcohol was not found in her vehicle. Fred was tested, and the reading was between 146 and 172 mg per cent.

Cozens explained that he would have to determine if there was a realistic risk of danger, which needed to be based in fact.

He pointed out someone may fall asleep in a vehicle after deciding not to drive it. This does not mean the individual may not change his or her mind later.

Cozens added a stationary vehicle may still be a danger to everyone around. The sleeping driver may accidentally cause the vehicle to move.

He clarified that just sitting in the driver’s seat while intoxicated can open someone up to the absence of care and control charge.

Cozens indicated it can be difficult to determine the risk the care and control situation poses. This includes considering several factors, such as:

• were the keys in the ignition;

• did the person have a plan to get home; and

• how far away the individual’s destination was.

Cozens indicated there is evidence that Fred called someone for a ride but that individual was not in a position to help her. That said, he felt this did not mean there was no realistic risk she would drive after she woke up.

“I would be hard-pressed to consider otherwise,” Cozens said.

He clarified that there was no evidence to say she was driving the vehicle before it was found by police.

That said, he felt Fred could have easily driven the vehicle since she’d been in the front seat and knew where the keys were. He pointed out she could have laid down and slept in the back seat until she could find another way home.

The judge explained that Fred had to provide evidence that there was no risk. He felt she had not done that.

“She has failed to do so,” Cozens said.

With that, he felt the conviction of failing to exercise care and control was justified.

Crown prosecutor Ludovic Gouaillier and Fred’s lawyer, Malcolm Campbell, were ready to proceed to sentencing that day.

Gouaillier felt the minimum sentence would be appropriate in these circumstances. This includes a $1,000 fine and one-year driving prohibition.

He wanted the court to consider that Fred took this case to trial to argue law, not her moral responsibility.

Campbell said his client, who has a Grade 11 education, is a member of the Kwanlin Dün First Nation. He pointed out she has been sober since January 2018 and has no criminal record.

He asked the court for six months to pay the fine.

Cozens agreed that the trial was a question of law, not of Fred’s moral responsibility. He felt the recommended sentence would work in this case.

He imposed the $1,000 fine and one-year driving ban.

Fred will be able to apply for an interlock system once she becomes eligible.

Comments (11)

Up 35 Down 2

Just Sayin' on Feb 4, 2019 at 9:29 am

Umm what does having a grade 11 education and being part of a FN have to do with being in the front seat? If anything, it should show that a lack of education and being part of a FN means you could make the right choice also.

Let's say, she feel asleep in the back seat, with the vehicle on, the stationary vehicle still could have moved or should she not have had the vehicle on to keep her warm. Convicted drunk drivers, get less time for driving.

Up 24 Down 6

Juniper Jackson on Feb 3, 2019 at 7:32 pm

If you are drunk/impaired.. call a friend, call your mother, call a taxi, but do not get behind the wheel of a car, put the keys in the ignition. That displays clear intent. If I went into the bank with a hand gun..I didn't say..this is a stick up..I didn't shoot anyone, but, I'd still expect to be charged with intent..For sleeping Michele Fred.. you are lucky you didn't push the car into park in your sleep and roll down a hill, or into the road.. actually, everyone is lucky that uses that road.

Up 20 Down 3

Mitchell Raftis on Feb 3, 2019 at 4:14 pm

I'm shocked! That this is worthy of writing an article about..... disappointed, in myself for even commenting on it.

Up 52 Down 8

Too far to the left on Feb 3, 2019 at 9:56 am

And this is what we plug our courts up with? It used to be if you were impaired and in control of a vehicle, keys in the ignition or in your pocket, you were guilty. Parked in a parking lot, along side the road, guilty. Why do we care if she was sober since January, grade 11 and a Kwanlin Dunn member? She was behind the wheel of a vehicle found along side the road, drunk. Don’t care how close she was to home or what her intentions were. Hundreds of people die every year from drunk drivers and we want to make excuses for this one. Pay your fine and be thankful nobody was hurt or died.

Up 21 Down 19

Alan Manning on Feb 2, 2019 at 7:46 pm

Another justice system witch hunt.

She did the right thing and was punished for a what if. For example, if you are caught with a gun or a loaded gun it does not mean you will create a crime with it.
With Gladue and overreaching judges, are courts are a rich ground for satire and they approach a television of justice.
It's sad and embarrassing.

Up 19 Down 16

At home in the Yukon on Feb 2, 2019 at 1:18 pm

Some years ago a BC police officer shared how he encountered a person passed out at the wheel of his car at a traffic light. As the car was not moving, the guy was found not guilty of DUI. I guess the law is arbitrary, huh.

And what's with the line, "he felt Fred could have easily driven the vehicle since she’d been in the front seat and knew where the keys were." Can we really be charged with the fact that we are in a position to commit a crime?

I think this woman needed a better attorney.

Up 14 Down 9

Daphne Privett on Feb 1, 2019 at 8:31 pm

Thank God she is still alive.

Up 33 Down 9

comen sence on Feb 1, 2019 at 7:12 pm

This really shows how bias the law is depending on one person to the next. I have a buddy that got charged impaired driving while in care and control of a vehicle when he was parked in a parking lot with the car running because it was really cold and had no intention to drive.

Up 32 Down 15

What? on Feb 1, 2019 at 5:45 pm

So I MIGHT wake up and drive drunk (but no evidence to support that) yet still convicted. What about the beyond a reasonable doubt thing?
The world has gone crazy. Yukon courts are such a waste of time and money. Makes me want to puke.

Up 31 Down 21

Wow, really? on Feb 1, 2019 at 5:09 pm

I can't believe our courts. I just can't believe our %#$$^ courts. She does the right thing and pulls over and still gets nailed. $1000 for sleeping in your vehicle and murderers get 4 years in the Yukon. I bet she's wishing she would have murdered someone instead. Cheaper (no out of pocket expenses), free rent, free food, tv in each room and she could have gotten rid of someone she doesn't like!

Up 21 Down 9

Groucho d'North on Feb 1, 2019 at 5:06 pm

Looks like the thin edge of the wedge to Thoughtcrime.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.