Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

ukon MP Larry Bagnell

Whitehorse to be part of anti-Harper rally

He continues to weather the opposition's wrath, that of newspaper and magazine editorials,

By Jason Unrau on January 13, 2010

He continues to weather the opposition's wrath, that of newspaper and magazine editorials, including a scathing criticism in The Economist, and now Prime Minister Stephen Harper will hear from disgruntled Canadians Jan. 23, during a series of co-ordinated rallies across the country to protest his decision to prorogue Parliament.

And local writer and college instructor Patricia Robertson hopes many will turn out in front of the Elijah Smith Building that day for a Whitehorse rally she is organizing to denounce Harper's "contempt for the democratic process.”

"As a writer, I know the history of stifling dissent from governments around the world and Canada's not immune,” Robertson told the Star today. "And I think we're already on the slippery slope, frankly.”

At the end of December, Harper announced he was suspending Parliament until Mar. 3, when his minority Conservative government plans present its Throne Speech and introduce this year's federal budget.

It's the second time in little more than a year that the prime minister has pulled the plug on the House of Commons.

On the first occasion, in December 2008, Harper prorogued Parliament to avoid a non-confidence vote and the possibility his party would lose power to a Liberal-NDP coalition government backed by the Bloc Quebecois.

On this occasion, Harper labelled the prorogation move as a way to "recalibrate” Parliament, blaming the Liberal-dominated Senate for stalling on two crime bills.

The prime minister also maintains this two-month break will provide his government the time it needs to craft the budget. It will also allow him to stack the Red Chamber with five new senators, tipping the balance in favour of the Conservatives.

But Yukon MP Larry Bagnell caged Harper's suspension of Parliament as a means to quell the burgeoning scandal brewing over the treatment of Afghan detainees that plagued the Conservative government for much of the end of 2009.

"My initial assumption was it was to avoid the special Afghanistan committee hearings because things were getting pretty close to the Prime Minister's Office,” Bagnell said today.

After Canadian diplomat Richard Colvin testified before the committee in November that cabinet was aware Afghan prisoners the Canadian military transferred to local authorities could be subject to torture, yet did nothing about it, the Harper governmentswitched to damage control mode, then pulled the plug altogether on any further investigation, according to Bagnell.

"This prorogation not only shuts down Parliament, but the committees are totally disbanded,” said Bagnell.

"It will takes a month or more to even reconstitute these committees, so it will be a long time before serious investigation can even occur on that potential coverup.”

The disintegration of parliamentary committees also impacts the Yukon specifically, Bagnell added, as work from two select committees that held hearings in the Yukon – one on poverty and northern economic development – will never see the light of day.

"Well, those have been disbanded too and so reports cannot even be done ... not to mention hundreds of thousands of dollars wasted on travel.”

Bagnell said he would definitely be attending the Jan. 23 rally and will join federal Green Party candidate John Streicker and territorial NDP Leader Elizabeth Hanson, who plan to speak at the event.

Robertson called the nationwide dissatisfaction, evidenced by the planning of simultaneous rallies for next Saturday afternoon (beginning at 1p.m. here), at the very least symbolic.

"It's not going to be a lengthy rally; the point will be to make the gesture, to show Harper that people across the country, including Yukoners, are deeply concerned, that we disagree with this decision,” said Robertson.

"I think Harper's underestimated Canadians. He's actually quoted as saying he doesn't think Canadians care.”

Comments (17)

Up 0 Down 0

Vlad Petrlak on Jan 23, 2010 at 4:53 am

GHardy, I am not sure what is worse, a criminal or an idiot. What you think?Try to save yourself, pleeeese.

Up 0 Down 0

francias pillman on Jan 22, 2010 at 11:12 am

Where did hippies come from? Where did the womens movement come from? All carefully funded actions. Don't believe me, go research it. You think you are saving the world but you are not. Where were you people when the liberals did this same thing? NOWHERE. You people look like moorns rallying against something that is indeed legal and has been done time after time. You people only listen to what the tv tells you. Never using your brain for critical thinking. In closing for my hippie friends, yes the beatles were also a setup,,lol. Especially on turning kids to drugs. Again, don't believe me, research it, because I have. Tavistock and friends? Shhhhhhh

Up 0 Down 0

Kashtin on Jan 22, 2010 at 5:15 am

G Hardy, it is oil sands, not tar sands and yes it is filthy.

The sandy forest soil is saturated with oil, which is leaching into the rivers causing health concerns to populations downstream. Animals are poisoned or die getting stuck in this mucky mess.

We are extracting the oil from this sand, not an easy job, and essentially cleaning up Mother Nature's own oil spill. Environmentalists focus on only selective issues, but in the overall picture it will eventually leave a better, cleaner environment.

Up 0 Down 0

jeff on Jan 20, 2010 at 3:21 pm

Bangell

Time to hang up the skates and allow someone with new ideas into power.

Up 0 Down 0

G Hardy on Jan 20, 2010 at 2:29 pm

francis pillman.. ? always with the hippy thing,is it because we hippys, way back when tried to warn society of the evils of putting unbridled progress before the health of our planet, the future of our grandchildren... and now we are there, probably at the point of no return. By the way, we were 100% right, and still are.

Its always a thankless task to try to save people from their own stupidity.

As far as stevie harper and his minions go,they are the real criminals, as are most conservative conspirators who hide behind their religious misconceptions.( just look at the filthy tar sands)

The sooner we get rid of this sick ideology, once and for all , the better.

Up 0 Down 0

footprints on Jan 20, 2010 at 6:20 am

Harper has consistently shunned attempts to cooperate with his colleagues on both sides of the floor and his withdrawal from public eye is perceived as cowardice by many Canadians. Just one example was his refusal before the last election to attend a national debate if it included Elizabeth May, an absurd decision to say the least especially considering he reneged on his "ultimatum" when the media called his bluff (May didn't even win her own riding, talk about paranoia on Harper's part!). Proroguing parliament 2 years in a row is but one more item in a long list of issues questioning his integrity.

Last year, Conservative's were quick to jump the gun, labeling the coalition attempts to legally form government a "coup d'état", yet they soon foolishly showed us their other face by claiming, "proroguing is allowed". If they are so against coalitions then why do they take part in them and why haven't they introduced parliamentary reform? It's because they can't manage to form a majority despite consolidating right wing extremism, even while other parties are in leadership and financial shambles. "Crybabies who want (absolute) power" but can't earn it. (John Baird's anger management issues...)

All this proves: our antiquated British parliamentary system only favors corruption and is in desperate need of complete overhaul, including our Senate, which is rendered useless by ruling party stacking. About the only advantage of this system is the ability for voters to witness just how far those elected will allow themselves to be controlled by puppeteers.

Where there is power, there is corruption. The only way to mitigate corruption is through balance of power. The Chretien regime was put in a totalitarian position largely due to the behavior of the Mulroney regime, as the Trudeau regime did the same for Mulroney...I hope Canada will never see another majority government again and those who refuse to cooperate in the spirit of democracy are dismissed by voters.

Up 0 Down 0

D G on Jan 19, 2010 at 1:27 pm

Where did the Bush/Obama comparison come from...

Up 0 Down 0

snowcanoe on Jan 19, 2010 at 8:16 am

I think the rally, and all the other rallies happening across Canada, will give Harper a clear message on what Canadians think about his parliamentary shenanigans. However, I am concerned that my attendance will be construed as support for Larry Bagnall. These rallies are a grass roots movement had have little to do with Liberal poseurs.

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on Jan 19, 2010 at 2:41 am

So Bagnell and that liberal clown named Iggy are not Obama stooges?

Face it, Bush is not in office but the sad thing is that Obama is ramping up Bush's anti constitution laws. Wake up, both are the same.

Up 0 Down 0

francias pillman on Jan 18, 2010 at 9:01 am

That photo of larry baggnell dosent do him any good. I see a weathered and tired man who is beyond his years. Please step aside larry, your time expired a long time ago. And i fully support the new RHINO party in the next fedral election. VOTE GREY, IGNORE GREEN/RED/francophonie/

Up 0 Down 0

footprints on Jan 18, 2010 at 6:11 am

I agree Kailey, nothing more than a puppet...

Good to see Geri Hall ambush him!

Harper: "Do you like handcuffs?"

Hall: "Should I like handcuffs?"

No wonder his party is too afraid to allow him another interview with 22 Minutes: not much between the ears and too much to hide.

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on Jan 15, 2010 at 5:26 am

It seems people are quick to forget the good ole days of Chretien and his liberal cronies and thier take on democracy. Should I go down history lane? Nah, why bother, STAR won't approve the comment anyway.

Keeping it short and sweet, VOTE RHINO PARTY!!!

Up 0 Down 0

Kashtin on Jan 15, 2010 at 4:34 am

Parliament has been prorogued 105 times in Canada's short existence by all governing political parties, four times by the Liberals to shut down the Somalia inquiry and another time to shut down the ad scam inquiry. Proroguing parliament is allowed by the Constitution and is a normal function of the Government. It is not an abuse of democracy or Parliament, nor is it an illegal act.

Parliamentary debate is on a break (the Government is still working); Terry Milewski (CBC) and Larry Bagnell should take a break as well instead of trying to create a national outrage over issue Canadians are not concerned about. Dog days of winter?

I believe that the blocking of bills in the Senate is the reason Parliament has been prorogued, not the detainee issue, and if a change of balance in the Senate through new faces will get Parliament working again, proroguing was a good idea.

When the Premier of Alberta, Ralph Klein, reduced the number of sitting days in the Legislature, Albertans were happy that the Government was not pushing regulatory bills for the sake of looking busy.

There is no widespread public outrage.

Up 0 Down 0

Kailey Irwin on Jan 14, 2010 at 11:57 pm

Personally I feel that none of our options are that great in terms of leadership. There are problems with all the parties; however, I really view Harper as the Canadian version of Bush and I feel that he does not have Canada's best intersts at heart and never will. I mean come on, our own Prime Minister actaully admitted he prefers to watch US news over Canadian news. You don't care to know what is really going on in your own country?? Seems to me he prefers the US scare tactics over the actual issues he should be resolving.

Up 0 Down 0

francis pillman on Jan 13, 2010 at 10:16 am

Boo.hoo. I'd rather have stephen harper than the useless CARBON TAX liberals. I plan on having an anti hippy protest at the same time as this rally, hope to see you there.

Up 0 Down 0

shirley telep on Jan 13, 2010 at 9:59 am

I for one am in support of prime minister harper, in fact i see no other opposition leader currently in the canadian government that could fit the role. Im also not in favour of larry being my m.o.p but we cant always get what we want. Liberals = crybabies who want power back but cant have it

Up 0 Down 0

Bonnie on Jan 13, 2010 at 9:00 am

I think I'm going to rally the boss for day off to Rally this Tyrant!

...let's not forget his funding cuts in all of the most important areas of our Nations needs to push his own George Bush butt-kissing agenda! Too bad Obama couldn't fire him, because he's obviously not budging for Us.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.