Whitehorse chamber speaks out against cancelled housing projects
The Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce is joining other organizations in speaking out against the cancellation of three
affordable housing projects in the city.
By Stephanie Waddell on July 2, 2014
The Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce is joining other organizations in speaking out against the cancellation of three
affordable housing projects in the city.
The Yukon government announced last week it was cancelling three projects that were to receive funding from the
Northern Housing Trust in Whitehorse. Two rural projects are slated to continue.
The government cited changes in the Whitehorse housing market and concerns put forward by the Yukon Realtors
Association and the Yukon Residential Landlords Association.
While the realtors association supports the cancellation of the initiative, the landlord’s group has stated that although it
had concerns and wanted some changes made, it didn’t want the projects entirely scrapped.
The Yukon Chamber of Commerce spoke out last week against the cancellation with the Whitehorse chamber now
adding its voice as well.
“A significant number of Whitehorse residents in the work force who are within the lower income spectrum will continue
to struggle each and every month to secure affordable rental housing for themselves and for their families,” said
incoming Whitehorse chamber chair Josh Clark.
As chamber president Rick Karp pointed out in an interview this morning, the Canadian Housing and Mortgage
Corporation has set its housing affordability threshold at 30 per cent of a household’s total income.
Rent has continued to climb over the last few years, leaving many spending more than that 30 per cent threshold.
With a large part of its membership being local retailers, Karp said his office continually gets calls from employers
looking to bring staff into the city but are unable to find affordable housing.
While the realtors association has argued that a number of Yukoners have purchased condos in recent years and
rented them out, adding to the number of rental units available in the city, Karp argued they don’t fit in the affordable
market range.
“There’s a gap in affordable rental apartments,” he said, noting it has been many years since any new apartments
were built in Whitehorse.
It’s a gap, said Karp, that needs to be filled.
He noted a number of the apartments he’s toured are showing their age and there are some with “appalling conditions”
such as doors which can no longer be shut, issues with mould, appliances in need of replacement or fixing and so on.
“And yet, rent continues to climb,” he said, noting that in a number of cases tenants do everything they can to keep
their units clean, but maintenance work is needed.
He acknowledged too that there are other cases where the landlords face issues with tenants who fail to look after
their units as they should.
Like the landlords association, his group did have some concerns with the housing initiative as it was proposed, but
didn’t see the need to scrap it, Karp said.
Rather, he added, some changes could have been made such as including some criteria for those who would be
renting the new units.
The cancellation of the Whitehorse projects, he noted, means the loss of an entire building season and for the
chamber “that’s disappointing.”
“There should have been construction started now,” Karp said.
Not only is it disappointing, but the situation also erodes the trust in the Yukon government’s processes, “which
businesses require in order to continually invest in the territory and Yukoners rely on for social, economic and
employment opportunities.”
As Clark stated: “We sincerely hope that a near-term solution can be found for the remaining $11.5 million in NHT
(Northern Housing Trust) monies that were transferred to the Yukon government by the federal government in 2006 to
build affordable housing units in the territory, including rental units.”
The chamber plans to continue calling for “increased mobility within the city’s housing market, which is key to a healthy
and sustainable community.”
Comments (3)
Up 15 Down 3
bobbybitman on Jul 3, 2014 at 11:20 am
Rents have gone up just slightly faster than inflation, and far less than the increase in the cost of buying. (Therefore the return on equity for the landlord has actually gone down.)
Rick Karp suggests the cost of housing should be 30% of income. What is the other side of the equation? WAGES.
Rick and Josh should be campaigning to put wages up, and putting prices up as needed, in order to pay a living wage to low income workers.
The Superstore is having a 'jobs fair', next week and they are advertising that their wages are $10.75 an hour, 'more for bakers and meat cutters'. This is far less than Westfair Foods (who own the Superstore and Extra Foods), used to pay cashiers before the Superstore opened, and before they started bringing in workers from the developing world after claiming they 'could not find Canadian workers'.
Up 4 Down 4
Josey Wales on Jul 3, 2014 at 6:00 am
Rick is upset?
He and his minions have absolutely decimated our "local" job force in a myriad of ways.
I grow tired of hearing what Rick or anyone has to say about "what we need"
Why does everyone feel it is the governments job to solve all that woes us, feed us, house us, employ us...in general...enslave us to THEM?
Up 4 Down 4
Johnny on Jul 2, 2014 at 7:23 pm
I agree, project shouldn't have been cancelled. Supply and demand. If there is more supply prices will go down; might not be right away but it will eventually as long as supply is there.