Photo by Whitehorse Star
DOROTHY BRADLEY; KAREN BALTGAILIS
Photo by Whitehorse Star
DOROTHY BRADLEY; KAREN BALTGAILIS
The Yukon government could be held to almost 40 conditions when it develops the city's next major residential subdivision in Whistle Bend if it goes ahead with the proposed recommendations from the Yukon Environmental Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB).
The Yukon government could be held to almost 40 conditions when it develops the city's next major residential subdivision in Whistle Bend if it goes ahead with the proposed recommendations from the Yukon Environmental Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB).
The board released its 83-page report detailing the 38 recommendations it is proposing for the 295-lot development.
The territory's Department of Community Services applied for the YESAB review as the developer of the proposed residential subdivision on Porter Creek's lower bench.
However, the city has been planning the new neighbourhood for a number of years.
While the first two phases are expected to be developed into 2012, the overall area is expected to provide the city with lot development over the next 20 years or longer.
"The Whitehorse designated office, pursuant to section 56 (1)b of the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Act, recommends to the decision body(s) that the project be allowed to proceed, subject to specified terms and conditions, as the designated office has determined that the project will have significant adverse environmental or socio-economic effects in or outside of Yukon that can be mitigated by those terms and conditions,” states the YESAB report.
It then outlines its recommendations.
Those urgings, spread over five pages, include everything from re-vegetation of disturbed areas to having no habitat-clearing between May 1 and July 31 to limit the impact on nesting birds and their off-spring.
Dorothy Bradley, president of the Friends of McIntyre Creek, told the Star this morning she doesn't have a big problem with what's proposed for the first two phases of the development.
What will come after that continues to be a problem for her.
”It disturbs me that they can't be honest,” she said of both the city and territory.
She cited the group's previously stated concerns over a proposed new road that would cross McIntyre Creek in the future stages of Whistle Bend.
Numerous groups and individuals expressed similar concerns at a public meeting held during the consultation phase of the YESAB review of the project.
They raised a traffic study done a couple of years ago that showed if traffic flows continue as they currently do, the Whistle Bend development would require another road that would cross at McIntyre Creek.
The city's most recent draft of the proposed Official Community Plan (OCP) also includes plans to develop a new section of Porter Creek called Porter Creek D.
City staff have said the focus will be on developing Whistle Bend in the coming years before moving on to Porter Creek D.
Bradley argued the city could see the road construction as a good time to install city services for Porter Creek D and that, inevitably, would be followed by lot development in the area.
Bradley recalled a meeting she was at a number of years ago where many people argued against moving ahead with Whistle Bend, but also said no to Porter Creek D because of the impact it could have on McIntyre Creek.
At the time, city staff seemed to agree with the public, and that has Bradley wondering what happened to those plans.
With the road not part of the first two phases of development, the YESAB did not review that part of the plan for this approval.
As it was explained by officials at an earlier meeting, the process involves the detailed plans for the first two phases.
If the road were to go ahead, it would be subject to a YESAB review.
Like Bradley, the Yukon Conservation Society is continuing to express concerns about the proposed roadway that's not outlined to be part of the first two phases of Whistle Bend.
Karen Baltgailis, the society's executive director, said this morning that by doing the assessments in different phases, the YESAB really isn't looking at the cumulative effects of the new neighbourhood.
"It is really disappointing that again we're getting a piecemeal assessment,” she said.
The transportation study suggests the road will be needed when the city's population reaches at least 25,000 and at least 1,000 residents are living in Whistle Bend, provided transportation patterns stay the same.
Whitehorse's most recent population figures show there are 25,690 people living in the city. It's expected about 1,800 people will take up home in the first two phases of Whistle Bend.
Baltgailis echoed Bradley's concerns over the possibility of developing Porter Creek D. She noted the conservation society will be keeping a close eye on the OCP process.
Sections of the draft OCP include clauses that could allow that and other roads to be developed through environmentally sensitive areas, she added.
Baltgailis said she hopes council pays attention to the concerns of many residents who have spoken out against the road development when it considers documents like the OCP.
While the society's major concerns are mainly over the roads and potential future development of Porter Creek D, she also cited smaller issues.
Those include the lack of a trail running around the entire subdivision, as was initially suggested, and the reduction of the proposed Eagle Bay Park from 16 to 14 hectares.
"That's a lot when you're talking about a small park,” Baltgailis said.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (8)
Up 0 Down 0
QC on Feb 25, 2010 at 3:11 pm
It's not called "corruptonomics", it's called "economics". Economics 101 will tell you price is dictated by the principles of supply and demand. This situation has been present since the dawn of man.
It's easy to point out housing that is more expensive than Whitehorse, but other than the downtrodden maritimes,can you suggest anywhere that real estate is cheaper?
Do you actually feel entitled to purchase a house below the national average cost?
Up 0 Down 0
Arn Anderson on Feb 25, 2010 at 11:38 am
Wow, reading my posts are we? Well we will call that Arnonomics which is not built on speculation or bubbles which benefit the greedy few.
Vote Samson Hartland!!
Up 0 Down 0
D G on Feb 24, 2010 at 5:03 pm
Arn I live in a "crappy trailer parks", I would love to afford a home somewhere else.
I grew up here and never really planned on leaving but the way housing prices are it might make more sense to go somewhere where house are affordable.
New development does affect prices, more lots mean lower purchase prices to get rid of the stock ie. lower lot prices = lower cost of new home then older homes follow suit. Houses in copper ridge used to sell for 140000-170000 for smaller homes I'm not referring to McMansions but the small single level 2-3 bedroom house.You can't find a decent 2-3 bedroom HOUSE in Whitehorse for under 200000, hell even the duplex's in Takhini are selling for 270,000 (MLS.ca # 6106) and those were built 50-60+ Years ago.
The only "corruptonomics" I see are the ones in which a home built 5 years ago will sell for more than what was paid for it, I doubt that that many improvements have been made. I know of a trailer that was put on land in 2002 for 110,000 and 3 years later sold for 170000 now that is "corruptonomics".
Oh and is "corruptonomics" a new word? The spell checker doesn't understand it.
I've read enough of your posts to know that what I say will not affect your thought process Arn.
Up 0 Down 0
Arn Anderson on Feb 24, 2010 at 7:56 am
Can anyone say 'housing bubble'? What a joke, you want to afford a house? Look at those crappy trailer parks. 10 years ago you couldn't give them away for $10000 now they are worth $60000? Explain that and I dont think new development affects housing prices because look at the constant expansion in Copper Ridge and everywhere else but prices still go up. Get a lesson in Corruptonomics before wasting my time reading your sad post.
Up 0 Down 0
D G on Feb 23, 2010 at 3:11 pm
I'm 24 years old born here, so on and so forth. If you care so much about what developments go where, just look where your own personal houses sit and what it used to be. THINK ABOUT IT. I want to be able to afford to pay off a house in my life time lets get property prices back to reasonable levels. The Yukon is a big place, there is a lot of wetland and other "biodiversity" area out there, let's make sure we can still enjoy it but I still wanna afford my house.
Up 0 Down 0
Dorothy Bradley on Feb 22, 2010 at 11:36 am
some of us love the wildlife and wilderness, that is why we are here. We would like to preserve as much as possible. with some forthought and cooperation we can have the best of both worlds. I care about the biodiversity because that is what sustains human life. Wreck the world and we kill ourselves. We cannot live without it. they still haven't found another planet for us to live on and time is of the essence. I don't think we are going to get a second chance.
Up 0 Down 0
francias pillman on Feb 19, 2010 at 7:32 am
Yea, who cares bout the animals, wildlife, or even doing it proper. Just RUSH, RUSH, RUSH. We will worry about the problems later. No wonder this place is going downhill, everyone has the brain of a tree stump. You guys aren't Yukoners, you are TORONTO-ITES, with you big useless city dreams, and your cracked out visions for this town. Heck you might as well build a VEGAN roundabout downtown, who cares.
Up 0 Down 0
roosterdaddy on Feb 18, 2010 at 1:53 pm
The Yukon is a strange place in that there is such huge opposition to literally everything! As an former Yukon resident I find it hard to believe that with such a low density that access to land is such a problem. 295 lots is such a small percentage of the overall land mass in the Yukon. Enough with the big meetings, all the reports, planning, enhanced consultation, etc. Enough whining and sniveling - approve the plans and move forward.