‘We’re going to win this,’ CPAWS vows
While the U.S. government has passed into law a tax reform bill that opens the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) coastal plain to oil and gas drilling, the fight to protect the Alaskan area appears far from over.
While the U.S. government has passed into law a tax reform bill that opens the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) coastal plain to oil and gas drilling, the fight to protect the Alaskan area appears far from over.
In Canada, the Gwich’in people – including the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation in the Yukon – have led the push against the tax bill and Alaskan senator Lisa Murkowski’s efforts to permit drilling in the refuge.
Drilling would threaten the calving grounds of the Porcupine caribou, an animal sacred to the Gwich’in people that migrates to the ANWR coastal plain every year.
Chris Rider is the executive director of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society’s (CPAWS’) Yukon chapter.
He told the Star this morning that his organization will continue to follow the Gwich’in lead – which could include legal action.
“There’s a lot of options that are on the table,” Rider said, including “legal options that are similar to the way we took the government to court over the Peel watershed.”
CPAWS was one of the appellants in the Peel Supreme Court challenge, alongside three Yukon First Nations.
“Even though this has been a huge disappointment the last few weeks, I think that in the long term ... the Gwich’in people, with support of groups like ours and people from around the country, we’re going to win this,” Rider said.
The Yukon and Vuntut Gwitchin governments released a joint statement last Friday.
It expresses sadness over the passage of the tax bill and ANWR drilling provisions into U.S. law.
That action, it reads, “goes against the spirit” of the Canada-U.S. agreement on Porcupine caribou herd conservation.
The ongoing, legally-binding treaty between Canada and the United States came into force in 1987.
Its objectives, according to a Government of Canada website, include conserving the herd and its habitat, protecting against damage and adverse effects to both and ensuring residents of the Yukon, Northwest Territories and Alaska have opportunities to use the Porcupine caribou in traditional ways.
“This remarkable herd has sustained communities across the northwest Arctic for millennia by providing an integral food source and way of life,” the joint government statement reads.
“Traditional and scientific knowledge will be at the forefront of our efforts as we endeavour to make sure a Canadian voice is heard during the U.S. regulatory process.”
Rider noted remarkable collaboration among the various parties that have been working to protect the caribou and their calving grounds on the ANWR coastal plain.
“This is one of those few instances where you see everyone on this side of the border all pulling together,” he said.
The New York Times reported last week that while drilling in the refuge has now been legislated, activity isn’t poised to begin right away.
The law now requires that one lease sale occur within four years, but “lawsuits and other actions by opponents of drilling could slow things, both before and after any lease sales,” the Times reported.
Rider pointed out that one strategy available to block movement on drilling in the coastal plain is to run out the clock until the next U.S. election in November 2020.
“If we can delay this for the next three or four years, we may be in a very different situation,” Rider explained.
The Republican tax reform bill and the president who signed it into law – Donald Trump – could both be ousted after the next presidential election.
In the meantime, Rider said, the Canadian government needs to take a stronger, more formal stand in the fight for ANWR.
He acknowledged that the Yukon’s representative in Ottawa, Liberal MP Larry Bagnell, has been “incredible and unwavering in his support.”
The CPAWS Yukon website hosts a petition calling on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to fight against the Trump administration’s push to open ANWR to drilling.
Yukoners can also sign and send postcards to Ottawa to express their solidarity with the Gwich’in people, Rider said.
The postcards are available from CPAWS Yukon. Postage is free.
Comments (9)
Up 0 Down 0
ProScience Greenie on Jan 1, 2018 at 4:36 pm
Speaking of taxes, it would be interesting to see Donald Trump's tax returns. Especially the Uzbekistan dealings with Iranian National Guard and Russian controlled contracting firms.
Up 2 Down 5
Alan Boomer on Dec 31, 2017 at 3:21 pm
Lets face the facts.
If there is economic pressure, even for short term benefits that come with high risk, the US will usually give in to the pressure and ignore first nation and environmental concerns. The even ignore sacred sites.
We are generally directed towards a path of risk and destruction and climate change- Whether it's a small marsh area that has nesting birds or a much larger area like ANWR the track we are on is to exploit and destroy and leave a mess for future generations.
The city of Whitehorse has a terrible track record- it's so nice that we have YESAB reviews and a process that thinks things through as well as First Nation governments that want protection over exploitation and destruction.
Please fight on CPAWS and First Nations, for protecting wilderness is the preservation of the world.
Up 2 Down 3
BnR on Dec 30, 2017 at 9:17 am
Really really?
OPEC contributes to CPAWs? Please cite your source(s).
So you find it ironic that CPAWs is forcing us to import gas/oil from countries with "horrible human rights records". Canada is a net exporter of crude, we only import crude because of the locations of our refining markets, and of our imports, 54% comes from the US. CPAWs isn't "forcing" us to import anything. All we need to do is build refineries in locations closer to source. It's cheaper for us to import than transport our own. Same with the U.S. It's cheaper to import from the Middle East than it is to develop and send oil from the north slope.
Your arguments are simplistic and not really based on anything factual.
This is a trans-border issue, just as the Tulsequah Chief mine was, and the Alaskan salmon lobby worked hard against its development.
Up 4 Down 0
jc on Dec 29, 2017 at 11:58 am
Good luck trying to trump Trump boys and girls. And wouldn't it be nice if contributing to the nation and economy was sacred to them? Where do they think all this money given to them tax free comes from?
Up 2 Down 3
David Dixon on Dec 28, 2017 at 1:50 pm
Hi: I agree completely with ProScienceGreenie. There isn't any need to open up ANWR and seriously negatively affect the Porcupine Caribou herd and the Gwitchen people who depend upon them for sustinence. The oil produced from ANWR can easily be developed by the USA's other domestic oil oil producers. Republican senators and congressmen could have easily got their recent tax reform bill passed without inserting the ANWR drilling issue into it. Shame on them and their poor excuse for a president.
Up 2 Down 3
ProScience Greenie on Dec 28, 2017 at 11:50 am
Lots of hydrocarbons on the market already and other areas to drill so no reason for the detestable Trump to open up ANWR for drilling by sneaking it in on his tax bill designed to enriched the already wealthy.
As far as CPAWS goes, they'll have a tough battle as they've been as bad as the far right when it comes to fear mongering, exaggeration on pretty much everything. CPAWS and their ilk have to accept some responsibility for the likes of the orange baboon Trump getting into power.
Sad to see these battles between the extreme fringes of the political spectrum destroy all reasonable and rational thinking and policy. Dangerous fools, all of them.
Anyways, best of luck to the caribou that have been doing their thing long before humans walked out of Africa. Between drilling and bullets it's a tough go for them and getting tougher by the day.
Up 5 Down 2
Really? on Dec 28, 2017 at 11:38 am
Really?
Does anybody really realize where CPAWS major funding comes from? OPEC, other nations looking to stop oil/gas development in Canada. I commend saving some land, but if we use oil/gas, which we do, we may as well have it come from our country or a country that we know value human rights and the rule of law. I find it ironic that CPAWS works to shut down our development so that we may import gas/oil from countries with horrible human rights records.
Also everyone cries bloody murder when the USA tries to meddle in our affairs, and here is CPAWS (Canadian) trying to meddle in Alaskan (American) affairs. The decision to open it up you may not agree with, but it was made by a democratic body, when you use the First Nations ( and CPAWS don't deny it, it is what you do, use First Nations to further your goals) to sue and sue, it is subverting the democratic foundation of both Canada and the USA.
Something for everyone to think about.
Up 5 Down 1
Robert Scott on Dec 27, 2017 at 11:41 pm
I would like to know how anyone can claim that ANWAR and the caribou will be destroyed by allowing some development in there. CPAWS are misleading the Quichin people and everyone else. They have no evidence. They play on people’s emotions!
Up 2 Down 2
Peter on Dec 27, 2017 at 6:20 pm
I think the Gwitchin First Nation gets their gas and oil delivered to them by air from Alaska so they have stove oil to heat their homes and gas for their atvs, sleds, trucks etc. But they want to stop the Americans not to drill?. Odd!
Also think twice waking up the giant and being a pain! They may deny you entry into their country. Let alone crossing over their air space.