Whitehorse Daily Star

Waste-to-energy program would be too costly: study

Yukon Energy will not be developing a waste-to-energy program, saying it would be too expensive.

By Ainslie Cruickshank on April 19, 2012

Yukon Energy will not be developing a waste-to-energy program, saying it would be too expensive.

"There just isn't a business case there,” spokeswoman Janet Patterson said in an interview Wednesday.

Patterson said over the past year, the energy corporation has completed a detailed analysis that took into account the City of Whitehorse's goal of diverting 50 per cent of its waste by 2015.

The study to determine whether waste-to-energy would be viable for the Yukon cost $500,000.

The federal government contributed $250,000 through the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency and the City of Whitehorse contributed $8,000, Patterson said in an email this morning.

The corporation was looking at a capital cost of $40 million for two megawatts of power, she added.

"It's just a very high price tag for a relatively small amount of electricity,” she said.

The electricity produced would also be expensive, Patterson said in a Yukon Energy blog post. At approximately 31 cents a kWh, it would cost about the same as diesel.

"We live in a territory of only about 35,000 people, so we have to be really careful about any projects we do. It's a small rate base, and we can't do projects that are going to burden people more than is reasonable to expect,” she said.

Last year, Yukon Energy held public consultations on the waste-to-energy project. Patterson said officials heard from a variety of people with different opinions on the project, some really supported the idea.

Others, like the recycling groups in the city, worried it would affect the success of their programs, noting that they were in early stages, said Patterson.

The corporation is now turning its attention to exploring other potential energy sources.

Patterson said Yukon Energy is collecting data to determine the viability of wind energy, using a wind monitoring station on Tehcho, formerly Ferry Hill, in the Stewart Crossing area.

The corporation had hoped to have enough data by now, but the equipment froze for periods during the winter. It will likely be several more months before enough data have been collected she said.

Hydro enhancements, including the possibility of releasing water at Marsh Lake more slowly during the fall and winter, are also being studied, as is the possibility of using liquefied natural gas as a transition fuel.

Comments (9)

Up 0 Down 0

Billy Polson on Apr 25, 2012 at 11:55 pm

Mining is the single reason YEC is searching for more power....there could be three more Whistle Bends powered without the mines from todays power production capabilities....YEC can't deny a customer power. But there won't be three more Whistle Bends because that kind of growth will not happen.

Mining in the Yukon (including exploration, etc.) employs 3000 folks annually...more than 1/2 these folks aren't residents of the Yukon....and the wealth goes to Vancouver, Calgary, China...too many examples of boom and bust in the mining sector to base any real growth predictor on it.....we may have more power than we can use in the future.

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Apr 24, 2012 at 8:11 am

Very little publicity is being given to the fact that the reason we need a lot more electricity is to supply mining. They should be coming up with the money to provide the infrastructure required to serve their own needs.

Up 0 Down 0

B on Apr 22, 2012 at 2:32 pm

Ralph thanks for that, but there is no need to CAPS LOCK EVERYTHING IN YOUR RESPONSE.

Up 0 Down 0

RALPH on Apr 21, 2012 at 9:45 am

B. THE HEATING JACKETS WITH WARM WATER IS SENT THROUGH THE WATER HEATING SYSTEM IN THE BUILDINGS YOU ARE TRYING TO HEAT. ELIMINATES THE NEED FOR A RADIATOR ON THE DIESEL ENGINE. INSTEAD THE HEAT ESCAPES IN THE BUILDINGS. VERY COST EFFECTIVE BOTH FOR THE USER AND THE ELECTRIC COMPANY. THE USER GETS CHEAP HEAT, AND THE ELECTRICAL COMPANY GETS GREEN CREDITS FROM THE FEDS. HOPE THIS HELPS.

Up 0 Down 0

north_of_60 on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:55 am

Yes, the pilot project in Watson Lake has clearly demonstrated the viability in the Yukon. Now it's time to expand it to other diesel-generator communities. Using waste heat from the generators is far more viable than any wind, solar or waste burning applications in terms of the cost of energy produced.

Up 0 Down 0

RALPH on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:17 pm

north_of_60. Watson Lake is already doing that. looking at expanding the infrastructure to utilize all the heat that is produced off the generators.

Up 0 Down 0

B on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:16 pm

how would you recover wasted heat from diesel generators?

Up 0 Down 0

My opinion on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:59 am

It doesn't make sense to abandon the idea of using garbage for energy i.e. Charlottetown, PEI has been doing this for a long time http://www.aboutbioenergy.info/Charlottetown.html

Up 0 Down 0

north_of_60 on Apr 19, 2012 at 10:40 am

A significantly more viable Waste-to-energy program would be to recover the 'waste' heat from the diesel generators in Watson Lake, Old Crow, Beaver Creek and Destruction Bay.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.