Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Coun. Roslyn Woodcock, Coun. Samson Hartland and Coun. Betty Irwin

Vote confirms taxes will rise by 1.7 per cent

City council confirmed its plans for a 1.7 per cent property tax increase, a four per cent hike in water and sewer rates and a 6.8 per cent jump to waste collection fees in adopting the 2016 operating budget Tuesday evening

By Stephanie Waddell on March 30, 2016

City council confirmed its plans for a 1.7 per cent property tax increase, a four per cent hike in water and sewer rates and a 6.8 per cent jump to waste collection fees in adopting the 2016 operating budget Tuesday evening

That’s in addition to other increases to a variety of user fees and services.

The $70.6-million spending plan enables officials to continue running the city – plowing roads, collecting garbage, keeping the water running and so on.

Tuesday’s vote means the average Whitehorse home owner will pay $2,304 in property taxes this year compared to the $2,265 they paid last year.

The increase to water and sewer bills will mean nearly $3 more in the monthly rate, which goes from $73.02 to $75.94.

The increase to standard residential waste collection will mean a 70-cent boost in the monthly rate, from $10.30 to $11.

Coun. Rob Fendrick was absent from last night’s meeting.

The six council members present were unanimous in their decision to go ahead with the budget. However, they also voiced their thoughts on the documents and what might come in future years.

Coun. Betty Irwin said council and administration had to make hard decisions to keep the tax hike as low as possible.

She stated the three objectives she believes council should always be working toward:

• shaping the city;

• delivering quality public services at affordable prices; and

• making the financial decisions that accomplish those.

This budget, Irwin said, accomplishes that.

Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu was also quick to defend the operating budget.

While taxes have gone up, she pointed out, the city has continued to roll back the mill rate, part of the equation which factors in property assessments done by the Yukon government.

The city has been working to keep taxes at a reasonable level for a number of years, she said.

Meanwhile, voting in favour of the budget was more of a “struggle” for Coun. Dan Boyd. He vowed to continue working toward getting the tax rate down in future years.

Most homeowners measure increases by their annual tax bill, which continues to go up, Boyd noted.

He acknowledged the efforts that went into keeping the tax boost to 1.7 per cent.

“We did work extremely hard on this,” he said.

It’s unfortunate the public doesn’t get a lot of opportunities to participate in the drafting of the spending plan, Boyd added.

Coun. Samson Hartland questioned staff on the amount projected to go to reserves (confirming that more than $9 million is anticipated to be put into reserves from the 2015 fiscal year, with $10 million-plus projected for each of the next three years).

Hartland too noted there were some difficult decisions made in drafting the operating plan. He said he would support the budget “with somewhat of a heavy conscience.”

Also expressing worries was Coun. Roslyn Woodcock. She cited “dire concerns” over the plan to pull $320,000 out of reserves to fund water and sewer systems operations.

The city opted to make the unusual move of using reserve funding (normally saved for urgent repairs needed to the system) for the water and sewer operations so the hike to bills would be more manageable for ratepayers.

“Pulling from reserves is not a sustainable solution,” Woodcock said, going on to make the same point on the issue of rolling back the mill rate.

She did concede there were some hard decisions in coming up with the budget. For that reason, Woodcock said, she would support the plan.

Finally, Mayor Dan Curtis added his voice to the chorus supporting the budget.

While taxpayers will see an increase on their bill, he argued, Whitehorse continues to boast low tax rates, considering there are more than 700 kilometres of road, infrastructure and so on the city has to maintain.

“It’s incredibly low,” Curtis said, pointing out that rising taxes are a reality for a growing city.

Before joining the rest of council in voting in favour of the budget, the mayor added he’s proud of the work his fellow council members and city staff put into coming up with the 2016 operating budget.

Not included in the budget is the proposed curbside recycling program.

Council has yet to approve the service that would be mandatory for those on the city’s waste collection schedule.

It was estimated in a past study that the recycling program alone would cost ratepayers $15 per month.

The city’s 2016 capital budget, passed earlier this year, will also see the city spend another $16 million-plus on a number of projects over the coming year.

Comments (22)

Up 4 Down 11

Taxpayer like the rest of us on Apr 5, 2016 at 3:27 am

North_of_60. Interesting how you take an article on city taxes and utilize it to bash entire groups of people. Rather than stereotyping people and disassociating them from the actual unselfish reasons they choose some professions, try looking at the actual purposes of the article. This article is about taxes which we all pay.

Up 21 Down 5

north_of_60 on Apr 2, 2016 at 3:31 pm

Most people understand that taxes are a necessity to pay for those services that benefit all of us. People are objecting to how those taxes are often misspent.

In recent years we've seen increasing expenditures to grow a bloated CoW bureaucracy, and proportionally less spent on actual services delivered.
For example, ever since a 'Sustainability Department' was created, our roads get far less maintenance, and many are in serious disrepair. What benefit is a 'Sustainability Department'; has it produced anything useful?
Money that used to go for services now goes to feeding a bureaucracy that grows unchecked like a cancer. It's rather obvious that Mayor & Council's highest priority is expanding the bureaucracy that employs their friends, not delivering municipal services.

Up 6 Down 6

June Jackson on Apr 2, 2016 at 1:52 pm

To Jason, who said: "which leads me to my next point: federal and territorial income and consumption taxes are 500-1000% more per year than property taxes, yet we never seem to gripe too loudly about that. "

People gripe about income tax and ecology fee's that don't go to ecology, and environmental taxes that don't go to the environment. The Star is a local news venue, and as such reflects local news. Income tax and all things federally finance..are on a much larger national scope, and you can be sure that people are watching it like hawks and commenting. Perhaps you could dip into the Toronto Sun, Globe and Mail, Winnipeg Free Press, Edmonton Journal, Ottawa Citizen...and then there is of course, CBC forums, CTV. I subscribe to several NATO forums and I often see one other poster who posts here on the Star.

My point is, that I think most Whitehorse residents are likely better read and better informed than given credit for when someone says, "we never seem to gripe too loudly about that". Because you don't see it here on the Star, doesn't mean it isn't happening.

Up 13 Down 1

Arn Anderson on Apr 2, 2016 at 8:24 am

The faces that represent Whitehorse's best and brightest. Dead ideas, no plans, taxes and fees hikes and bylaw revenue enforcement. Vote them in again!

Up 23 Down 21

Jason on Apr 1, 2016 at 8:37 pm

The cynicism and misinformation in these comments is startling. Obviously, we're only hearing from a handful of the thousands of taxpayers in Whitehorse, but the vocal minority sure make their voices heard loud and clear! A couple of really apparent (to me) points that I would like to highlight. First off, I am a taxpayer. Do I like paying taxes? Not really. And that's not limited to property taxes either, that is income tax, gas tax, GST, liquor tax etc. Property taxes are an antiquated system for collecting revenue and likely place an undue burden on property and business owners. However, is the City to blame for that? No, no they're not; this is the system that they are mandated to utilize by the federal and territorial government.
I can bet that the City would much rather do away with property taxes and move towards receiving some portion of income taxes, which leads me to my next point: federal and territorial income and consumption taxes are 500-1000% more per year than property taxes, yet we never seem to gripe too loudly about that. And how many of your income tax dollars do we see back? Well locally, they don't [directly] pay for things like roads, landfills, sewers, water, parks, recreation centres, trails, cemeteries, recycling etc. Actually, most of the stuff that makes our lives better is funded by property taxes.
Last point - cost of living rises, this is inevitable. That's why a 4L of milk was a $1 in 1985 and now it's $7 in 2016. Yet the expectation according to the commenters is that the City do the same (or more) with less money. That doesn't seem logical to me. No one enjoys giving away their income, including me, but it takes the whole community to bake this pie. Personally, I love this city and everything my tax dollars pay for.

Up 25 Down 3

north_of_60 on Mar 31, 2016 at 5:47 pm

Political Reality Check: Politicians only have to listen to the taxpayer/voters for a month or so every few years when elections roll around; they'll promise anything to get elected. Once elected they will 'rub elbows with' and answer only to the members of the $100k+ Sunshine Club in the bureaucracy they serve day-to-day.

Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy states that in any bureaucratic organization there will be two kinds of people":

First, there will be those who are devoted to the goals of the organization. Examples are dedicated classroom teachers in an educational bureaucracy, many of the engineers and launch technicians and scientists at NASA...

Secondly, there will be those dedicated to the organization itself. Examples are many of the administrators in the education system, many professors of education, many teachers, union officials...

The Iron Law states that in every case the second group will gain and keep control of the organization. It will write the rules, and control promotions within the organization.

The simple fact that the membership in the CoW's Sunshine Club is hidden from the voter/taxpayers who pay for it, merely proves the point.

Up 12 Down 1

Mooo on Mar 31, 2016 at 2:14 pm

Great one. So true.

Up 35 Down 5

What's This? on Mar 31, 2016 at 1:24 pm

Interesting how everyone commenting has overlooked how Councillor Woodcock is advocating for higher taxes, because she doesn't want to dip into the trough? There's a councillor that won't be getting my vote next time. Fool me once, and you're not fooling me again!

Up 59 Down 7

Adele Sandrock on Mar 31, 2016 at 12:07 pm

..... and while our Mayor was such a good boy, he will be rewarded with a nice all expenses paid China trip.

Up 46 Down 6

Mooooo on Mar 31, 2016 at 11:12 am

Is it me or does the city think of the taxpayer as a dairy cow that might go dry if it does not get milked often enough?

Up 27 Down 8

This shows mostly liberal council and mayor on Mar 31, 2016 at 7:49 am

tax and spend the residents so far down a rabbit hole we will never get out of it or the City will need a bail out from the Yukon Government.

Up 38 Down 3

Francis Pillman on Mar 30, 2016 at 9:45 pm

Why do we even elect these people? Might as well just have robots. Oh look, lol. Never mind.

Up 48 Down 3

Wolf on Mar 30, 2016 at 8:55 pm

Very dissapointed. Two of the merry bandits ran on a promise not to raise taxes. Mr. Boyd and Mr. Hartland should resign from their positions.
Oh wait.. There is still the vote to "raise their wages".

Up 39 Down 5

Financially wounded on Mar 30, 2016 at 7:40 pm

The reserve fund? What a joke the reserve surplus is. This is a fund of false intentions as bureaucrats think this is their slush fund to waste on whatever they can imagine that we don't really need like the new amalgamated City services/administration building (placed as horribly as one could imagine) when the old buildings were doing just fine. Recall legislation now please?

Up 53 Down 4

Smurf on Mar 30, 2016 at 7:38 pm

And here it comes:
The next wave of rent increases and people moving out of the Yukon because they can't afford to live here anymore!

In times like now with a really bad economy why not postpone some projects (like the "Curtis Castle") and cut some spending (like the Sustainability Department) and look after the citizens?

But no - like always: COW attitude - my way or no way...

Up 29 Down 10

Politico on Mar 30, 2016 at 7:21 pm

What a bunch of malcontents. You voted them in, even the two councilors that campaigned on fiscal restraint voted for the budget. Maybe they know something you guys don't?

Up 33 Down 3

Pjt1959 on Mar 30, 2016 at 7:08 pm

Well glad to see that COW only seems to know how to raise taxes and fees in an economy that is going down. Time for city manager to manage and make her money not get more for doing nothing. Have to agree with June no one on council seems to tighten the belt but let it out. No oil, no mining, no industry only Government. Tourism does not make for higher paying jobs as we all know service jobs are low paying. That is my rant.

Up 21 Down 10

BnR on Mar 30, 2016 at 6:27 pm

Gotta get this straight: CofW spending Whitehorse resident tax payer money on projects and services that benefit residents AND creates jobs in the construction sector=bad.
Yukon Party spending other taxpayers money on projects and services that benefit residents AND creates jobs in the construction sector =good!
I love the irony of it all.........
Hmmmmmmm.

Up 33 Down 22

Josey Whales on Mar 30, 2016 at 4:44 pm

I can understand it for this year but want to see tax increases below the inflation rate in the future.

Up 53 Down 9

June Jackson on Mar 30, 2016 at 4:29 pm

No surprises here. Every single council we have elected in the last 4 elections, starting with Buckway, has viewed the taxpayer as a money tree to be harvested at every single opportunity and as heavily as the traffic will bear.

The only way the voter will ever have any control over City council is to have some sort of impeachment process in place where voters can get together and fire their sorry a**es. As their paychecks are never at stake, what do council members care about rising taxes and rising prices?

It’s incredibly low,” Curtis said, pointing out that rising taxes are a reality for a growing city. We aren't a 'growing city" at the moment.. in case you haven't noticed how many moving out sales there are, and how many houses on the market... I hope this is your last term..

Up 50 Down 8

Lost in the Yukon on Mar 30, 2016 at 4:27 pm

Pissed

Up 61 Down 8

Can anyone believe this on Mar 30, 2016 at 3:38 pm

6.8 in waste reduction fees and $20 dollars for blue box program. Give the City residents a break. Did all you voters vote for this type of treatment? I did not think so.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.