Photo by Photo Submitted
LONG-DISTANCE APPEARANCE – Michael Nehass appeared in Yukon Supreme Court in Whitehorse this morning from the Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences. Photo courtesy RCMP
Photo by Photo Submitted
LONG-DISTANCE APPEARANCE – Michael Nehass appeared in Yukon Supreme Court in Whitehorse this morning from the Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences. Photo courtesy RCMP
The Crown plans to retry Michael Nehass.
The Crown plans to retry Michael Nehass.
Michael Nehass, 32, appeared in Yukon Supreme Court in Whitehorse this morning with his lawyer, Anik Morrow, via video from the Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences.
Crown prosecutor Eric Marcoux appeared in person.
They discussed plans to proceed with the case after a mistrial was declared by Justice Scott Brooker on Feb. 15. Brooker appeared this morning via video.
Last week, Marcoux, Morrow and amicus Richard Fowler had a “discussion about practicalities” by phone.
“I think it’s fair to say that the Crown is intent on proceeding,” Morrow said in court this morning.
There were questions over whether Justice Brooker’s order that Nehass is unfit to stand trial has been vacated following the mistrial. Normally, a mistrial ruling vacates any previous orders.
However, Morrow, Fowler and Brooker agreed that the ruling would likely stand in this case.
“My reaction is my ruling will stand until which time another ruling is made,” said Justice Brooker.
A new trial court will have to decide when Nehass is fit to stand trial.
But it is unclear whether the trial will take place in territorial or supreme court.
Marcoux’s intentions were to have a judge-only trial in supreme court, but Morrow has asked him to consider having the case heard in territorial court.
These are the latest issues in a long and legally complicated case.
In May 2015, during a judge and jury trial, Nehass was found guilty of several charges, including assault with a weapon and forcible confinement.
The charges stem from the violent assault of a woman at knifepoint in Watson Lake in 2011.
Nehass remained in custody the entire time but was never sentenced.
As part of sentencing, the Crown was seeking to have Nehass designated as a dangerous offender.
But during his assessment at Ontario Shores, two doctors submitted reports finding him unfit.
On Jan. 24, Justice Brooker ruled that Nehass was unfit, relying on common law from the 1800s. The Criminal Code only addresses fitness before trial.
It’s believed to be the first time in Canadian history that someone has been declared unfit after he or she has already been tried.
This led to the mistrial order, as Brooker found there was nothing under the common law that allows judges to make treatment orders and the Criminal Code does not apply.
Nehass was first declared unfit by Justice Michael Cozens in 2014, but the Yukon Review Board overturned this decision.
He was also charged and pleaded guilty to several counts, including assaulting a corrections officer and causing damage to the jail, while he was in custody at the Whitehorse Correctional Centre (WCC).
As well, he filed charges under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms alleging procedural delays and poor detention conditions have violated his rights.
His father, Russell Nehass, filed a complaint with the Yukon Human Rights Commission in 2014 alleging discrimination and inhumane treatment by the WCC, including the overuse of segregation.
Now, Nehass will have to undergo the trial process again.
Justice Brooker, Nehass, Marrow, Marcoux, and Fowler will appear in Yukon Supreme Court on March 6 to decide whether the case will be tried in supreme or territorial court.
Nehass will remain at Ontario Shores for treatment.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (7)
Up 6 Down 1
YukonMax on Mar 4, 2017 at 10:28 am
Maybe he should hire Mark McDermid as his lawyer...
Up 6 Down 30
Charmain on Mar 2, 2017 at 2:28 pm
mj
He actually use to live a few doors down from me and my family. He sat with us and visited and talked. Like I said, people should not be judgmental and I will stand by this. Yes, he can be violent but he can also be helpful and caring. Sad to say, some family members share the views as most people on this page. I know how much he helped his "family" and how he was always striving for their approval to no avail. Since he was a boy, he was lost, always trying to fit in somewhere. I swear if his mom survived, he would have turned out differently. Some of us are fortunate to have our parents here today regardless of how we grew up at least they were there. Invite him to stay at our home? I would. Like I mentioned, you probably don't even know who he is except from newspaper and the news and everyone else's opinions.
Up 28 Down 4
Mj on Mar 2, 2017 at 5:58 am
@charmaine
Yes he is a nice guy. I'm sure. Anytime someone passes away by any means all you hear about is how wonderful they were, because pointing out their downsides no matter how dominant seems a tad moot and it is the persons family and friends that feel that way. Everybody has family...and strangely everyone has friends so people are going to think that was about everyone. Even drug dealers who contribute nothing to society will have friends that say "well he sucked it up for me once..he is a really good guy"
Every person that ever lived has had friends and family that say, "you just don't know him...I know he chops off people fingers but he really is a nice person". Not equating Nehass to this man...but even Hitler had friends and supporters.
People judge him and have an opinion on him because it is the safety of the community at stake. I think that gives the right to others to have an opinion....oh also there is the basic right of every Canadian to free speech and to have opinions.
No one has ever claimed that he doesn't like teddy bears and doesn't probably think puppies are cute. But likening teddy bears doesn't make him a good person either.
If he gets out...are you going to invite him to live with you? Doubt it...
Up 25 Down 4
jc on Mar 1, 2017 at 4:56 pm
"Poor Mr. Nehass"? Poor victims past and future. Because we all know he will be released soon and know what he is capable of.
Up 9 Down 34
Charmaine on Mar 1, 2017 at 2:38 pm
I have been reading about Michael for long time now. I know this guy personally, do you? Yes he has an angry side but he also has a side where he is always/was wanting to help people out in any way he can. I know him from when he was a small kid! His life was full of tragedy, yes I know that is not an excuse for his behaviors but holy hell, what gives a person the right to judge others? Especially if you don't know this guy? Do you know his dad, (his mother passed on when he was very, very young) do you know his family? Do you know what his family is going through with all this?
Been locked up in seg for how many years???? Having to attend court (no matter how you attend) naked? All those years with no real contact? Not allowed contact?
One should not be so judgmental of other people especially when they don't know the person or what they have been through. Yes I feel for the victims here also and I do know the victim. Do you know her?
Up 31 Down 6
June Jackson on Feb 28, 2017 at 6:50 pm
Poor Mr. Nehass.. I think he should be kept in a facility for the criminally insane for the rest of his life...Get him out of prison..he doesn't play well with the big boys and eventually one of them will kill him...recognizing that, prisons will put him in segregation and back into isolation, and this crap will start all over again.
Put him in a nice facility where people are trained to cope with the Nehass's of the world and leave him there...forever.
Up 44 Down 4
john henry on Feb 28, 2017 at 3:14 pm
Gee's, how much is this costing? Prosecutor's and lawyer's must be raking it in. I should have been a lawyer or prosecutor I would have retired early.