Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Geoff Quinsey

Vacuum of information on e-waste questioned

It will likely be Monday before it’s clear exactly where Yukoners should be taking their e-waste after Oct. 1.

By Stephanie Waddell on September 5, 2018

It will likely be Monday before it’s clear exactly where Yukoners should be taking their e-waste after Oct. 1.

Amanda Couch, a spokeswoman for the Department of Community Services, told the Star this morning the request for proposals has closed on the contract for a depot, but the contract hasn’t been awarded.

An announcement about the location is expected Monday, Couch said.

The uncertainty arose at Tuesday evening’s city council meeting, when changes to the waste management bylaw were brought forward for council’s consideration.

The proposed amendments would reflect the changes to the territory’s designated materials regulations to include electronic and electrical waste that are expected to come into effect Oct. 1.

As Geoff Quinsey, the city’s manager of water and waste, told council: “Both electronic and electrical products as listed in the designated materials regulation schedule will become banned waste.

“Banned waste is not accepted at the waste management facility. After Oct. 1, 2018 – or the date when the new regulation will come into effect if there is a delay on YG’s part – the city will not charge a tipping fee for these products since they will not be accepted at the waste management facility.”

Quinsey’s report went on to highlight plans to advertise that it will no longer accept e-waste at the landfill after the territory informs the city where e-waste will be collected.

Coun. Betty Irwin was quick to highlight the tight timeline for the changes – with no indication of where residents should take their e-waste after Oct. 1.

“Shouldn’t the public be made aware?” she questioned. She later commented that she doesn’t think it’s fair that the public hasn’t been notified.

Others also highlighted the short time frame for residents to learn where to take their e-waste.

Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu asked if city staff have had “any indication” on when a depot will be ready.

Quinsey responded that the territory has indicated an announcement will be forthcoming.

The territory’s online tender management system shows one proposal – valued at $595,580 – was received for the depot. It came from the Raven Recycling Society.

Coun. Roslyn Woodcock acknowledged she’s somewhat nervous about how things may initially fall out with the change. She also commented she’s “super-excited” for the new regulations to come into effect.

Meanwhile, Coun. Dan Boyd suggested there should be more of a transition period where residents could initially bring their e-waste to the landfill.

The e-waste collected there could then be brought to the depot.

Quinsey confirmed such an option could be considered. He also made it clear that administration believes this is the best way to deal with the changes, as it makes a clear line for residents on where e-waste should go.

Council, which has now finished its annual summer break from meetings, will vote next week on whether to move forward with the changes to the bylaw.

Coun. Rob Fendrick was absent from last night’s meeting.

Comments (8)

Up 3 Down 0

My Opinion on Sep 9, 2018 at 3:54 pm

@ Harvey
You are out of line. Make your points, that is a debate. No personal shots please.

Up 6 Down 0

Josey Wales on Sep 9, 2018 at 9:43 am

Gee Harvey...guessing you are not a fan?
So because they are bloating daily, YG, CoW, Feds and other pretend levels can spend and consume unnecessary like....contributing to ewaste not even required to be well, wasted?
Is that what you suggest, as it reads as that.
Actually in your style, you read as you might be infected with Justine like cognitive comprehension.
Which is by any measure very dismal, did ya enjoy the recent barbecue in shipyards?
If you choose to make things personal, so too will I Harvey...if the gatekeepers will allow me to defend oneself

Up 6 Down 1

Harvey on Sep 8, 2018 at 5:19 am

@(the outlaw legend) Josie Wales: Based on the fact that YTG and the COW are the biggest employers in town by far your (Trump like genius) speculation is probably most correct. Do you think they test the water in Porter Creek itself for these toxins to make sure there is no leaching because I believe the ground water there at the dump is all inter-connected. The millions of gallons of fire dousing also went somewhere along with those toxins. There was also a huge grey/black cloud from the dump two days ago that drifted over PC and CV (cough,cough). Anyways it's good to see you not running the city down like you used to. The dump is horribly mismanaged as compared to elsewhere. (Thanks Bilbo)

Up 7 Down 0

Noz on Sep 7, 2018 at 12:35 pm

@Politico

Older sets are filled with lead in solder and as far as CRTs, this is on wiki:

Older color and monochrome CRTs may have been manufactured with toxic substances, such as cadmium, in the phosphors. The rear glass tube of modern CRTs may be made from leaded glass, which represent an environmental hazard if disposed of improperly. By the time personal computers were produced, glass in the front panel (the viewable portion of the CRT) used barium rather than lead, [citation needed] though the rear of the CRT was still produced from leaded glass. Monochrome CRTs typically do not contain enough leaded glass to fail EPA TCLP tests. While the TCLP process grinds the glass into fine particles in order to expose them to weak acids to test for leachate, intact CRT glass does not leach (The lead is vitrified, contained inside the glass itself, similar to leaded glass crystalware).

Here is one method of removing lead from theglass:
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0370-44672015000300287

Up 11 Down 2

Josey Wales on Sep 6, 2018 at 9:21 pm

Allow me to completely speculate...
I suggest the biggest user of war eagle for e waste would be the many levels of governments.
Each year pissing away the surplus prior to the end of the fiscal year, buying assets not actually required...just to keep the bloat...bloating.
I have no numbers, base it on squat....just me spidey senses tripping?
Anyone else with actual facts which are void in this particular post to back up or debunk my totally fabricated and suggestive angle?

Up 5 Down 2

Politico on Sep 6, 2018 at 4:19 pm

@TL, that's amazing since the lead is in the glass, not alloyed with other metals. How do they get the lead out of the glass?

Up 4 Down 5

Tom Lymbery on Sep 5, 2018 at 10:43 pm

Teck Resources in Trail, BC reclaims about a ton of lead each day from old TVs - as well as other elements. That's why old TVs are so heavy.

Up 19 Down 5

Max Mack on Sep 5, 2018 at 5:03 pm

I hate to say I told you so, but buried in this story is the proof that the new e-waste regulations and accompanying fees are simply a mechanism for funding Raven Recycling.

Wonder how many millions more we can sink into that "good cause" before residents finally wake up to the coordinated shake-down by all levels of government?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.