Photo by Whitehorse Star
Steve Geick
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Steve Geick
Watson Lake Coun. Cynthia Kearns is not commenting on a call for her resignation.
Watson Lake Coun. Cynthia Kearns is not commenting on a call for her resignation.
Reached this morning about the demand put forth by the Yukon Employees Union, Kearns said she wasn’t at liberty to discuss it right now, but that “it’s being dealt with.” She would not comment beyond that.
The union demanded her resignation Thursday in light of comments she made at a meeting of council which was meant to be in-camera, but was instead broadcast via webcast.
What was meant to be an “in-camera” meeting was held following the council’s regular session which is broadcast live to the town. The camera wasn’t turned off as it was supposed to be and the discussion could be viewed by anyone on the Internet.
In an interview this morning YEU president Steve Geick said after the June 18 broadcast, the union received a number of calls from both its members and residents of Watson Lake taking issue with comments Kearns had made.
They complained that Kearns had made “disparaging” remarks about two senior employees for the town, stating they weren’t worthy of a proposed raise in pay.
In a statement Thursday, Geick commented: “Naming individual workers in such a derogatory manner, whether behind closed doors or during a live broadcast shows poor judgement and a fundamental disrespect of the town’s staff.
“Clearly, Ms. Kearns is not able to fulfill the duties of her role as councillor in an impartial and effective manner. She needs to step down immediately.”
At a meeting held between the two employees who were named and Watson Lake’s chief administrative officer on June 30, the two staffers were told to simply disregard Kearn’s comments with the issue to end there with no follow-up required, Geick said.
The employees and union disagree. The union is now demanding a “full and formal apology” from mayor and council as well as Kearns’ resignation.
Geick said this morning a further complicating factor is the negotiations underway for the collective agreement – which was likely the subject of discussion at the June 18 meeting. While the union is waiting for mayor and council to sign off on the agreement so union members can then vote on whether to ratify it, this may impact that situation.
He argued while council has the final signing authority for the town on the collective agreements, for the most part they are to remain at arm’s length on such matters.
In the spirit of collective bargaining, he noted, there should not have been any individuals named during council discussions on the deal.
For now, he said, the union will wait to hear back from Watson Lake’s town council on the matter.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (6)
Up 10 Down 0
Fred Statham on Jul 8, 2014 at 3:01 pm
Mistakes are made; we are human. It used to be that when we made a mistake we acknowledged the error that was made, and apologized to those that were harmed. Now it seems that nobody will take responsibility for anything; let alone apologize.
It is time for honesty and integrity to return to public life. This would be a good time to start.
Sincerely, Fred Statham.
Up 9 Down 2
Just Say'in on Jul 7, 2014 at 10:48 pm
As part of a collective agreement negotiations, wages and the justification for those increases are discussed. Someone left the Camera on and let it go viral, that is the problem. Not that they were discussing it. Yes, I thinks she has grounds for having been set up. People in that room believed they were speaking in confidence.
Up 20 Down 11
come on! on Jul 6, 2014 at 3:15 am
What happened to free speech? If Kearns feels they're not worth their money then that's her opinion and nothing wrong with it. Might even be that she is right - then it wouldn't be derogatory at all. Or has Geick hard evidence that the senior employees are worth a raise?
Up 18 Down 7
June Jackson on Jul 5, 2014 at 7:59 pm
Its incidents like this one that reveal who a person really is. It seems to be acceptable these days to say or do truly awful things, and then say.. "I'm sorry" and think that everything is ok. Not everyone forgives and no one ever forgets. One see's and "I'm sorry" from our federal reps nearly every day. We struggle on one hand to teach our children curtesy, values, respect and our leaders open their mouth and undo it all. We have some terrible representatives and they should all get a dog shaming sign to wear.
Up 15 Down 9
Just Say'in on Jul 5, 2014 at 7:13 pm
Why is there any controversy? It was an in-camera meeting. Things are discussed in-camera that are private discussions, and of course may be controversial. Like when you have a performance review on your job, you meet with a couple of people and then when you leave they talk about you, and your job performance and your future with the company, it is completely normal. What is wrong is whoever was responsible for stopping the broadcast and I am sure that was not Cynthia. I think if anyone has a case it has to be Cynthia that has been betrayed, and thrown under the bus.
Up 23 Down 11
No Surprised on Jul 4, 2014 at 5:41 pm
It hurts when you get caught with your pants down. However, I am not surprised.