Photo by Whitehorse Star
Karen Baltgailis
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Karen Baltgailis
The Yukon Conservation Society says a transaction between two companies offers a telling glimpse into the value of quartz mineral claims in the Peel River watershed.
The Yukon Conservation Society says a transaction between two companies offers a telling glimpse into the value of quartz mineral claims in the Peel River watershed.
Karen Baltgailis, the society's executive director, issued a press release Friday regarding the sale of 112 claims for $1.
In her statement, Baltgailis suggests the $1 fee reflects the true value of mineral claims in the Peel watershed.
"This confirms Miningwatch Canada's October 2012 report that showed that the mining claims in the Peel watershed are almost worthless,” Baltgailis said Friday.
This morning, however, she acknowledged she has no proof the $1 did not simply reflect a transaction fee in the re-arrangement of assets between two affiliated exploration companies.
Baltgailis pointed out the claims originated with Archer Cathro & Associates, were transferred to Zinccorp Resources Ltd. and are now being sold to Strategic Metals Ltd., a company managed by Archer Cathro.
"I don't pretend to be an expert on the business dealings of junior exploration companies,” she said.
"But it just flagged for me there is something going on with these claims that does not look very valuable.”
There was no answer at Zinccorp's Vancouver office this morning.
Archer Cathro declined comment on the conservation society's release.
The society's executive director said the apparent low value of the mineral claims counters the Yukon government's claim that it can't offer maximum wilderness protection for the Peel watershed because it couldn't afford to pay compensation for all the mineral claims.
Baltgailis and others have suggested in the past the staking rush in the Peel from 2004 to 2010 was more about milking investors than it was about staking true value in the remote region.
The land use planning exercise for the Peel watershed is the subject of fiery debate in the Yukon.
The four affected First Nations, the conservation society and the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) are calling for maximum protection, as recommended by the Peel planning commission.
The government, which has the final say because 98 per cent of the planning area is territorial Crown land, has so far indicated it can't accept the planning commission's recommendation.
The recommendation, the government says, is one-sided, and does not provide the necessary balance between wilderness protection and the interests of the mining industry and others.
The final round of public consultation on the recommendation closed Feb. 25.
The government has not yet released any summary of the last round of consultation, nor has it yet posted the written submissions it received.
CPAWS issued a statement last week suggesting their records indicate more than 7,500 individuals came out during the last round in support of maximum wilderness protection.
Baltgailis said if the government had not placed a moratorium on the collection of the annual $100 fee or the equivalent value of work to keep the claims in good standing, it's her belief far fewer than the 8,400 claims in the Peel would still be registered.
The government implemented the moratorium on the collection of fees while the land use planning exercise continued, along with a moratorium to prevent any further staking of claims during the final planning stages.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (6)
Up 0 Down 0
Joel on Mar 21, 2013 at 8:12 am
They would also be sold for $1 if they were ever vacated. all the military base closure over the years have been $1 transactions as well.
If you don't pretend to be an expert on the business dealings of companies, don't make blanket comments on them.
Up 0 Down 0
Arn Anderson on Mar 21, 2013 at 2:44 am
The YTG building, the federal building on Main St and City Hall all have an low value indicator. They contribute nothing to society and should be bulldozed into free parking lots.
Up 0 Down 0
Nile on Mar 19, 2013 at 10:17 am
This exemplifies why Karen and her crew of enviro bunnies have no idea what they're talking about! Educate yourself and don't join the CPAWS cult just because your life is so good you can't think of anything else to complain about.
Up 0 Down 0
San Holloway on Mar 19, 2013 at 4:16 am
To be fair, these claims could have been sold for $1 as part of a more complex business deal or future considerations. It happens all the time in the industry. The $1 could have represented goodwill as part of a complex collaborative agreement between companies.
That said I have some experience working in the mining industry and support the protection of the Peel as recommended by the planning commission. Our industry recognizes there has to be a balance between having access to mineral resources and protecting natural areas for parks and other public needs. Our industry views setting special natural areas aside as one of the highest priorities of a modern society.
The mining industry understands the need for balance. The industry also understands the need to have more consultation with FN's from the early stages of staking claims and assessment work to the final construction and operation stages. The industry is highly supportive of the Canadian government and FN desire for mining royalties which flow to local first nations. This is part of being socially responsible and using good business practices in our modern world.
Our industry does not support an adversarial relationship between government and First Nations. If the Yukon government resorts to court challenges we recognize that a primary objective is to determine legal certainty; however, we sincerely promote respectful discussion, consultation, collaboration and an open exchange of ideas rather than a hard line which fosters opposing camps.
Our industry will always be an integral part of Yukon and we will endeavour to responsibly mine mineral resources for Canada and the world. Protecting special areas and working honourably with government and First Nations is one our highest priorities.
Sam
Up 0 Down 0
Yukoner on Mar 18, 2013 at 2:14 pm
Is this actually a story?? Someone saw something in a report and wasn't really sure what it meant so they made something up... If there really is no potential in the Peel then the environmentalists don't have anything to worry about..
Up 0 Down 0
bobby bitman on Mar 18, 2013 at 8:01 am
"are calling for maximum protection, as recommended by the Peel planning commission"
Note that the final recommendaion of the Peel Planning Commission was for 55% permanent protection, which is far from 'maximum protection'. 20% would be open to mining and development immediately, and 25% would be set aside for 10 years to allow Yukoners in the future to make a decision on how to use these resources.
Furthermore, 'protection' does not mean the area will not be used. It is already used by many for hunting, outfitters and guides with tourists, canoe tours, and many others both in the tourism industry and privately.
What it means is protection from roads and mining, so that current uses can continue and grow, and also for wildlife and ecological values.