Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

ON THE TRAIL OF LEGISLATION – Vern Peters and Ellen Johnson are on the steering committee of the Trails Only Yukon Association and are concerned about ATV use off trails and in the alpine. They are seen here this morning in Peters' Porter Creek home.

TOYA disappointed by absence of legislation

The Trails Only Yukon Association (TOYA) is continuing its call for the government to take action on off-road vehicle (ORV) use throughout the territory.

By Stephanie Waddell on May 1, 2013

The Trails Only Yukon Association (TOYA) is continuing its call for the government to take action on off-road vehicle (ORV) use throughout the territory.

Officials with the group are set to be at the annual Yukon Trade Show this weekend to discuss the issue with local residents and encourage them to get in touch with their MLAs in calling for action.

TOYA steering committee members Ellen Johnson and Vern Peters met with the Star this morning.

They hope the territorial government will pass legislation in the fall to address ORV use, including where the vehicles may go.

The group, which has been pushing for more stringent regulations since 2009, called for it during the 2011 territorial election, with all parties supporting new legislation.

However, there has been little action since, the two advocates pointed out today.

Two weeks ago in the legislature a motion was brought forward (and eventually passed) by NDP MLA Kate White.

It called for the government to implement all the recommendations which emerged from a select committee on the safe operation and use of off-road vehicles.

It also called for a plan to be developed and implemented to protect environmentally sensitive areas from the vehicles while also allowing responsible access to the backcountry.

Today, Peters and Johnson stressed the importance of the government moving forward on legislation, pointing to evidence of spider-webbing trails carved by vehicles in the Yukon wilderness.

It was in 1981 that ATvs were first flagged as an issue by the-then Department of Renewable Resources (now Environment Yukon).

Since then, polls, surveys and recommendations have pointed to the need to take immediate action to protect the land, but little has happened, Peters said.

"Overwhelmingly, the public wants us to do something,” Peters said.

The group met with Environment Minister Currie Dixon as well as Energy, Mines and Resources Minister Brad Cathers in December 2012.

Last January, they received a letter stating the government's plans to further define regulatory requirements, draft regulations and do consultation.

But both Peters and Johnson argued time is of the essence, with the ATV season approaching.

The territory only has to look within its own borders to see what works, the pair said.

They pointed to Kluane Lake, where trail signs have been in place for years letting riders know where they must stop.

"Already in the Yukon, there's been a precedent,” Peters said, noting it has worked very well in southwest Yukon and he doesn't see why it can't be done in other areas.

He also cited other jurisdictions throughout North America which restrict access for ORVs in the interest of protecting the wilderness.

The territory should take a proactive approach rather than reacting after the unsightly damage has been done to the land, Peters said.

Maps spread out over his coffee table displayed sites where ATVs could be required to stop and their drivers then required to hike in if they want to go any further.

With more than 10,000 kilometres of established trails, it was argued there's no need for further trails for ORVs.

In many cases, ORVs are going beyond the ends of old mining roads that can be designated for ORV use and creating a spider web trail effect into areas that need protections – alpine regions, wetlands and so on.

"It's just good common sense,” said Peters, who uses ATVs himself.

There is a significant impact on wildlife, which ends up losing its grounds or being hunted to a point the area they were in has to be closed as hunters make their way in on ORVs.

And then they simply move on to other areas and the same thing happens.

"All across the Yukon, it happens,” Johnson said.

Certain areas should be protected entirely, the pair also stated, proposing total protection for the Trout Lake area.

There has to be a place for uninterrupted wilderness, they argued.

While most ORV owners are responsible with their machines, Peters stressed there need to be consequences in place for those who aren't.

As Johnson also pointed out, there's also a number of drivers who think that as only one driver, they can't make a huge difference.

Regulations would also set out very clearly what ATV users can and can't do.

Johnson and Peters said they want the Yukon to protect the quality wilderness so many people visit and move here for.

"We're just so lucky to be in a place like this,” Johnson said after noting, "We want the Yukon to be the Yukon.”

As TOYA moves forward, it's reminding ORV riders to stay on the trails that are already in place.

In the meantime, TOYA plans to continue its efforts gathering pictures of the impacts ORVs are having on the land along with encouraging residents concerned about ORV use to write to or phone their MLAs with their concerns.

Comments (8)

Up 1 Down 0

Northone on May 2, 2013 at 11:08 am

After seeing the picture in this article, I wasn't sure whether I should laugh or just shake my head. Some guy with four trophies on his wall is sanctimoniously telling ORV users that they are somehow responsible for the decline in wildlife? Is this serious?

What is really going on here are a bunch of retirees with nothing better to do looking for an easy target to impose their will upon. They won't touch the mining or outfitting industries but ORV users, they're an easy target.

I applaud YTG for taking a very cautious stand on this issue and not rushing into anything. Most of us who actually get out on the land know that environmental problems in the back country are not caused by ATVs - a few ruts in the ground are not a basis for sweeping over-regulation compared to other things going on out there.

Up 0 Down 0

Rob Ziegler on May 2, 2013 at 9:49 am

Hunting sheep isn't necessarily about finding the ones with the biggest and thickest horns, most times it's just about finding ones that are LEGAL (old enough) to take. Have you ever hunted them before? They're seldom easy to find and even harder to get close to. I would bet Mr. Peters has been hunting for many years, the mounts on his wall simply being examples of the times he was particularly lucky. A nice mount on your wall doesn't automatically mean you're a trophy hunter.

It also occurs to me that the people who design the hunting regulations probably know a good deal more about genetics than you, Jackie. If you were acquainted with even basic, high-school genetics I doubt you would have made the statement you did. Or did you not pay attention in biology? Taking the oldest rams is what makes the most sense genetically, not the least.

I agree with you Stan, conscientious hunters make the best advocates for conservation and preservation - what sort of hunter sets out to destroy a habitat to the point that they can't hunt anymore?

It's not like they're suggesting ATV/ORV's be outlawed, just that they be confined to designated trails in the interest of keeping human impact to a minimum. Is having to hike in to get to the best areas really so unreasonable? Stop being so lazy.

Up 0 Down 0

Jackie Ward on May 2, 2013 at 5:36 am

Really Stan? Really? As my above comment said, killing off the genetics of a herd should be illegal. That act alone harms our animals more than any ATV would. Or maybe you would rather look past my comment and stick your head in the sand. No one can counter what I have said, I love it. Hunting, especially sheep hunting, when the name of the game is the biggest horns, harms the herd. So I hope the Yukon Party does nothing with this hippie feel good legislation.

"A hunter knows where the animals are and to some extent what habitat they need to survive."

A hunter should know they are signing a death warrant for a herd when they kill off the biggest and best genetics. But a small head of horns doesn't make a great mantle piece does it? What a joke.

You are not hunters. I won't use the word, but it starts with P and ends with S.

Up 0 Down 0

Stan Cummings on May 2, 2013 at 2:36 am

I would rather have someone who hunts and has 4 very nice looking sheep on his wall speak about the preservation of alpine habitat and the animals that live there rather than people who just want to run their ATVs up there for questionable recreation pursuits.

A hunter knows where the animals are and to some extent what habitat they need to survive. An avid sincere hunter wants preservation and protection as ironic as it may seem.

Thank you Vern Peters and Ellen Johnson- I agree time is of the essence, with the ATV season approaching.

Up 0 Down 0

Frank Smiley on May 1, 2013 at 3:43 pm

ATV traffic widened my favourite trail and cut up a bank near a really nice creek- well it was nicer before.

The guns, drinking, loud noise, and late partying never involve people who walk, its always people driving ....- well you can guess.

Up 1 Down 0

Jackie Ward on May 1, 2013 at 2:46 pm

Nobody cared about this ATV issue until all the soy eating hippies infested the Yukon. Newsflash. ATVS are not destroying our world. You wanting to control every aspect of our lives.

BTW: I find it sick, the people who murder animals so they can decorate their house. I have no problem with hunters feeding their families. But you losers who go out and hunt for the biggest horns are destroying vital genetics that these big animals pass on to their offspring. It literally makes me sick to my stomach. Right here, you have a guy blabbing about saving the earth from ATVS and in the same breath is proud he snuffs out wildlife just for their head on his wall. An act that has a grave consequences for our wildlife. What a joke.

Up 0 Down 0

Atom on May 1, 2013 at 1:07 pm

Here, here..This from the extraordinary group of gentlemen again.

Couldn't agree more Wolfe. It's irony that toyas wish to see no one allowed to use atvs to hunt will create more fly in hunting and pressure those areas more. The outfitters will be pleased for sure.

The price of one ATV is roughly 8 years worth of fly ins for each hunter.

Then restrictions in the hinterland from hunting. Oh well, I guess Vern and co have had their turn. But the outfitters won't have to stop hunting.

There just isn't that much destruction going on to begin with. But with all the pictures it's hard to deny quads leave tracks....just like miners and loggers and horses that have crisscrossed the Yukon for the past hundred years.

Up 0 Down 0

Wolfe on May 1, 2013 at 8:33 am

"There is a significant impact on wildlife, which ends up losing its grounds or being hunted to a point the area they were in has to be closed as hunters make their way in on ORVs."

Hmmmm .. this group reminds me of "Ducks Unlimited" The only reason they care about the preservation of wetlands is so that hunters have more places to shoot ducks.

Based on the picture attached to this article, one can only assume that the underlying agenda is to ensure that the hunters can enjoy their sport. Obviously the preservation of game is not the concern, otherwise we would not see 4 sheep mounts on his wall!

"Certain areas should be protected entirely, the pair also stated, proposing total protection for the Trout Lake area."

Got your eyes on a big ram in that area do ya?

"Johnson and Peters said they want the Yukon to protect the quality wilderness so many people visit and move here for."

For what? So they can shoot more sheep?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.