Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Sue Ross and Tracy-Anne McPhee

Teachers seek injunction against government plan

The Yukon Teachers’ Association (YTA) is taking the territorial government to court over its plan to post job openings this spring, before offering those positions to teachers who will be laid off this summer.

By Gabrielle Plonka on March 12, 2020

The Yukon Teachers’ Association (YTA) is taking the territorial government to court over its plan to post job openings this spring, before offering those positions to teachers who will be laid off this summer.

The YTA claims this is in violation of their collective agreement, which promises job priority to teachers in the system before openings are posted publicly.

The YTA is seeking an injunction from the courts that will bar the government from posting positions for the 2020-21 school year before offering those positions to staff who were laid off in the 2018-19 and 2019-20 school years.

YTA president Sue Ross told the Star Wednesday that the government’s decision to post job openings is a pivot from practices established last hiring season, after the implementation of the collective agreement.

“I truly do not understand the government’s position,” Ross said. 

She explained that last spring, a number of teachers in the system experienced layoffs and were offered positions at other schools before those openings were advertised to the public. 

During a meeting on Feb. 18, Ross was informed by officials of the Education department that the government would change its approach, and intended to post vacant teaching positions for the 2020-21 school year prior to June 8.

Ross was also informed that a number of teachers would be laid off prior to the end of the school year, and those teachers would be required to submit applications in competition with members of the general public.

Ross told the Star she was taken aback by the meeting, which she believes violates the collective agreement, which states that employees represented by the YTA are entitled to re-employment without competition for a period of two years after being laid off.

In her affidavit, Ross states that requiring laid-off teachers to compete for positions would deny employees the job security they are entitled to through the collective agreement, potentially forcing teachers to leave the Yukon to seek employment. 

She added that the government’s actions undermine the relationship between the YTA and its members, injuring the confidence teachers have in the association. She called the damage “irreparable.” 

Approximately five meetings took place between the YTA and the government before the decision was made to go to court, Ross told the Star.

She was told that teachers are not officially laid off until the school year is over, even if they have received layoff notices. This means teachers aren’t entitled to job offers while they’re still technically employed.

“They’re sticking to their interpretation … (that teachers) are not laid off until the last day of school, but then, unfortunately, all the good jobs will be gone,” Ross said.

She said she met with government officials on Feb. 6, 13, 18 and last Friday.

That day, it became clear that a resolution would not be reached, and the union immediately filed a petition to the Yukon Supreme Court.

During Wednesday’s question period in the legislature, Yukon Party MLA Scott Kent challenged Tracy-Anne McPhee, the minister of Education, to abandon the rehiring plans and “get out of court.”

McPhee responded that she expected Kent to know better than to ask questions related to matters before the court, which she would not comment on. 

“On occasion, parties who have the best interests of children in mind do disagree,” McPhee said.

She refuted Kent’s accusations that the government has repeatedly excluded and disagreed with the teachers’ association.

She said the issue is a dispute with interpretation, and she looks forward to a resolution being found.

Comments (14)

Up 9 Down 2

Tater on Mar 17, 2020 at 4:32 pm

We want the best of the best and should not accept anything else. If you are one of those, laid off or new, you can apply for the job and you should be successful at getting it. Remember, a good job is a privilege, not a right.

Up 6 Down 18

Miles Epanhauser on Mar 16, 2020 at 3:59 pm

They should have teacher internships that lead to job offers. They should target graduates of colour, first nation teachers, visible minorities etc.

Up 17 Down 8

Oya on Mar 16, 2020 at 9:27 am

@ edie rue I absolutely 100% concur with your statement. The YEU is useless.

I fully support this move by the YTA. Hold your government accountable for the contracts they have signed onto, supposedly in good faith. YG will do everything in their power to continue doing whatever they want regardless of signed contracts. This is the definition of bad faith, in my books.

Who decides if YG should fight legal battles or if they should settle in any given case? Is it the Justice Dept? Is it the Premier? Is it the individual Minister acting on advice coming from the (possibly corrupt) department in issue? Who is responsible for deciding those questions??? Is it a blanket response... like fight all possible liability regardless of who the other party is? Fight until we bankrupt them? Is that YG's strategy?
I would like to know who makes those decisions. Can you find out, Whitehorse Star?

Up 9 Down 2

Juniper Jackson on Mar 15, 2020 at 11:25 pm

BnR: criticizing my, or anyone else's opinion accomplishes what? Besides a ' you don't understand either' type comment, what have you got to offer about this issue? You don't even leave room for a discussion.

There are several commentators that often post; there are times there is a great debate going on as each poster defends their opinion.. you have been part of those. What happened that you made a personal comment this time? Am I just really annoying on this issue?

Up 9 Down 11

BnR on Mar 15, 2020 at 11:02 am

Geez Juniper, for someone complaining about socialists, your past comments certainly label you as one.
From the Star.
June Jackson on Jun 26, 2014 at 10:11 am
"We are a rich country and residents have a right to expect a certain standard of living."

Up 27 Down 8

Juniper Jackson on Mar 13, 2020 at 4:45 pm

Normally, I would say.. best person for the job. Period. I personally know an Office Admin person that YTG hired over the phone from BC. They can't tell me there is no one in the Yukon not qualified to be a receptionist. So many people from Ontario here, 1000 new arrivals in the last 13 months? That indicates to me, that if the application is from the Yukon, it's an auto rejection.

In this instance.. just this one time.. take the Liberals to court.. it IS ironic though.. a bunch of socialists taking a bunch of socialists to court.

Up 12 Down 5

Jack B. Nymble on Mar 13, 2020 at 3:24 pm

Hello Edie - Most people refer to the document as the “Collective Deceivement!”

Up 20 Down 7

edie rue on Mar 13, 2020 at 12:26 pm

The YTA is impressive. This level of action is nice to see as those paying for the service deserve it.

Maybe the YTA can take over the Yukon Government Union duties. Other than setting up a Collective Agreement, they are essentially useless. I have tried using them and have first hand experience that they are useless.

Up 11 Down 6

Bob Graham on Mar 13, 2020 at 11:53 am

Solution is pretty simple. If Teacher's given layoff notices aren't given preference before a new outside hire, once officially working their last day & now on layoff get to bump out a new hire as they will have seniority with YTA. All the Gov't has achieved is misleading a new hire.

Up 23 Down 13

SheepChaser on Mar 13, 2020 at 11:15 am

The territory is obviously reaching around the association to hire more competent teachers. Two of my neighbours work at a community school while their partner home-schools their own kids. That says it all.

Well done YG!

Up 13 Down 9

Josey Wales on Mar 12, 2020 at 10:02 pm

Hmmm...YTA is taking the Liberal Party to court eh?
If ever a time to reflect....the snake eating itself?
Was my first visual.

I say farm out those indoctrinators, to a foreign “temporary” labour force.
It seems to be great for other industries, cheap labour and decimated the concept of entry level jobs for Canadian kids, destroying well the middle class...why not the Liberal elites themselves that very very often ARE the “teachers” affected?

A awesome by product would be better communicators with all the new liberal voters and their kids soon too be filling those chairs.
...as they may have come from the same 3rd world

Up 31 Down 11

BnR on Mar 12, 2020 at 5:44 pm

“I truly do not understand the government’s position,” Ross said. “
Join the club.

Up 30 Down 24

iBrian on Mar 12, 2020 at 4:52 pm

I agree with YTG on this. It should be the best available Teachers selected for the job.
Sorry, but after all, it is our CHILDRENS education and future. If YTG laid off some of these teachers during the school year. Theirs likely a reason.
Those laid off teachers can apply for the job. But most certainly they should not get it because they stayed here.

Up 20 Down 8

stephen on Mar 12, 2020 at 3:19 pm

So let's get this straight, the government is in a contract and wants to waste tax payers money to go to court to play games and see if they can win for what reason?
Nice job. Fill the positions and teachers working til the end of the school year can't apply. Something stinks and the minister is at the heart of it.

Seriously who came up with this game plan? If it's senior members of the ministry of education they should be fired!!
Question I would have asked is what game is the minister and the Education department playing and why? Don't let them hide behind the "its before the courts I can't comment" excuse.

Do these people ever think is this a good use of tax payers money to do this when under contract?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.