Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

DISRUPTING THE PRESENT FOR THE FUTURE - This has been a summer of major infrastructure work in Takhini North (above) including a new sewage system.

Takhini North residents may get break on interest

Residents of Takhini North could end up pay about half the interest rate they were expecting on the Local Improvement Charge (LIC) the city is charging each property owner for work being done in the area.

By Stephanie Waddell on August 4, 2009

Residents of Takhini North could end up pay about half the interest rate they were expecting on the Local Improvement Charge (LIC) the city is charging each property owner for work being done in the area.

Along with building new lots in the neighbourhood off Range Road, the city is overhauling the water, sewer and roads.

The owners of properties fronting the streets are being levied a local improvement charge, totalling about $1.1 million of the $9.6 million worth of work, based on the size of their lots.

Most individual property owners are set to pay between $8,000 and $22,000 on their properties. The exception is condo owners at 30 Normandy Rd., who will each pay $1,559.60, and the Yukon government, which will pay $113,182.40 for the charge on its property.

City officials originally estimated an interest rate of eight per cent on the charge with a 15-year repayment plan for residents. However, as council heard last night, that could change thanks to the recession and the federal government.

Rob Fendrick, the city's director of administrative services, said the federal government's Economic Action Plan 2009 has a number of housing-related initiatives being delivered by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. (CMHC).

"These measures are intended to create employment through timely and targeted investments to build new and renovate existing social housing, and fund housing-related infrastructure," notes the administrative report delivered to council by Fendrick.

"This is a very timely and fortuitous event in terms of the Takhini North LIC, as the rates are very favourable."

The indicator rate with the CMHC is at 3.75 and 4.25 per cent now compared to the eight per cent indicator rate that was initially expected through the bank.

However, as Fendrick pointed out, the indicator rate is simply that: an indication of what might be expected. It could be higher or lower depending on where rates are in December, when the loan is expected to be taken out.

The interest rate will remain the same though for the 15-year amortization period on the loan.

Questioned by Coun. Dave Stockdale, Fendrick noted the work on Takhini North - including a second phase of development of new lots next year - will bring the city's capital reserve for the work down to about $1 million after it is finished.

"Slowly but surely, we've sort of had to finance some of these projects through one of two reserves and then we'll have to re-allocate the land bank reserve," he said.

"And in about five years, we'll be back up to the $20-million mark in the reserves, but currently we're using the reserves."

Council will vote on whether to go ahead with the bylaw to borrow for the LICs next week.

Comments (3)

Up 0 Down 0

anie on Aug 7, 2009 at 3:23 am

Shortly after we bought our lot, the water/sewer line in the neighbourhood had to be replaced. It had deteriorated (things do) and was not up to acceptable standards of the day. We paid for that through a surcharge on our taxes for a period of 10 years. Within 2 years of that project, the City decided to pave our neighbourhood. We paid for that through another surcharge.

That's the way capital improvements are paid for in a municipality. And that includes the replacement of old, deteriorated water/sewer systems.

Up 0 Down 0

Joshua James on Aug 4, 2009 at 3:22 pm

I think any comptent lawyer would advise the owners that the title was transferred as fully serviced lots and that the city has the full responsibility of maintaining those services from general revenue.

The city has accepted taxes at full rate and is required to provide the existing services according to current code requirements.

To do otherwise or attempt to do otherwise is a blatant "abuse of privlege".

Again, a competent lawyer might suggest that even an attempt to levy extra charges renders the city liable for damages, both real and general.

Up 0 Down 0

mosi on Aug 4, 2009 at 2:41 pm

Ring, Ring, goes the Cash register. You

have all been bought for Bev Buckways'

pockets (or is that her purse?)/ Ring!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.