Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Dave Borud

Supportive housing development gets council’s approval

City council gave final zoning approval Monday for a new 84-unit supportive housing development after a bit of a roller coaster ride for the project proposal.

By Chuck Tobin on February 11, 2020

City council gave final zoning approval Monday for a new 84-unit supportive housing development after a bit of a roller coaster ride for the project proposal.

The five-storey development is planned as phase one of a two-phase project to provide housing alternatives for seniors.

Phase two is to be a new 32- or 36-unit apartment building to provide independent living alternatives for seniors, to be built on Rhine Way, behind the supportive living development.

Dave Borud of KBC Developments explained this morning the intent is to break ground on the supportive living development in May, with completion scheduled for the fall of 2021.

While the company director could not say precisely what the supportive living project will cost, it will be in excess of $30 million, he said.

Borud said the design team has been on hold awaiting the final decision by council regarding the zoning bylaw.

The Rhine Way lot is already zoned to accommodate the independent living apartment building.

Borud said in theory, they could build both at the same time, though they’re looking to the Rhine Way lot as a lay-down for the construction material required for the supportive living development.

The plan, he said, is to begin construction of the independent living project soon after completion of the first phase.

Initially, KBC Development was looking for a reduction in the parking requirements for the supportive living project, from 42 parking stalls or one for every two living units to 21 stalls, or one for every four units.

City administration recommended to city council the reduction be approved through a change in the zoning bylaw.

The company was also seeking a boundary realignment by slicing off 557 square metres of the Rhine Way lot KBC purchased from the city and attaching it to the Range Road lot to accommodate some parking, waste bins and propane tanks.

At a public hearing on the proposal on Jan. 13, and in written submissions to council, Takhini neighbourhood residents were strongly opposed to the reduction in parking requirements.

On-street parking is already a problem in the area and reducing parking requirements would only make it worse, they insisted.

KBC subsequently revoked its request, and instead proposed an underground parking garage with 38 stalls, in addition to 14 stalls above ground, for a total of 52, or 10 more than the minimum required.

In addition to removing the parking request, the proposed zoning bylaw was further amended to increase the boundary re-alignment by 331 square metres to 888.

Council approved the bylaw in a six-one vote, with Coun. Steve Roddick registering the dissenting vote.

In keeping with his insistence that the city needs to maintain parking requirements for multi-unit housing projects to avoid increasing on-street parking, Roddick suggested the boundary re-alignment was akin to borrowing from Peter to pay Paul.

By slicing off a piece of the Rhine Way lot to provide some parking for the supportive living project, the availability of parking for phase two will be a problem, the councillor suggested.

Other members of council voiced appreciation for KBC’s decision to go with underground parking to address concerns raised by the neighbourhood.

“He certainly showed he was community-minded and will be a good neighbour in that area,” said Coun. Jan Stick.

Borud said today there is a possibility of underground parking for the independent living apartment building as well. It adds to the cost and the construction schedule but there is the possibility, he said.

Borud said the ground conditions are good, just as they are for the supportive living project.

There is a need, a “huge need,” for independent living units in the city, he said.

Borud in the past has described the overall project to council as a seniors’ complex where seniors can live independently, and when they feel it’s time, they can move next door to supportive living units, without leaving the neighbourhood.

Comments (11)

Up 1 Down 0

Anie on Feb 17, 2020 at 9:12 pm

To My Opinion: what on earth are you talking about? “NIMBY”??? I’m not opposed to this project, never even suggested that, so what is the basis for your rant?

Up 1 Down 0

Jack C. on Feb 16, 2020 at 9:13 pm

I would suggest to Ms Stick that an initial scam offer of 21 parking spaces does not suggest good open neighbor to me.

Up 5 Down 7

My Opinion on Feb 14, 2020 at 9:50 pm


Your NIMBY is showing too.
You are probably one of the ones screaming to have the Govy do something about affordable housing.
Unless of course it is in your neighborhood.
What a personal conflict Eh????

Up 21 Down 1

Anie on Feb 13, 2020 at 2:40 pm

Juniper Jackson, thank you for pointing out reality. Too often, people assume that aging in place is preferential to assisted living. Not necessarily. It's important to dispel myths by repeatedly reminding people of facts.

Up 12 Down 9

Jonathan Colby on Feb 13, 2020 at 10:19 am

Your opinion? It's garbage.

I live here. I attended city hall meeting about this issue, and I've spoken to several Neighbors about it.
If you knew anything, nobody has opposed the development, just the request to ease parking... and the data, especially the locally gathered data, suggests that the existing parking requirement was necessary to meet demand.

You use the same false talking point that Mr Borud attempted, even though both his AB based and our local numbers spoke a very different reality.
Maybe instead of having an opinion, you should have some facts.

Up 27 Down 1

Juniper Jackson on Feb 13, 2020 at 1:26 am

I don't drive atm. But I have a car. AND I want to keep it. AND the staff working in the facility are not arriving by broom. Because you are in assisted living doesn't mean you never go out. That family doesn't come and take you to lunch. I am amazed at Whistle Bend.. though I still don't want to be there, too far from family for me.. but I visit others there and there are all kinds of activities, there is a gym, a kiln! craft rooms, TV lounges, games. People don't go there to die.. they go there to live better with their illnesses or disabilities. A person that can't walk, living in their own place, ends up isolated there. Studies show that isolation and loneliness kill more seniors than anything else. Assisted living, someone can help them with their hygiene, push their wheel chair to the card room. It was built, I think, almost as a hospice, but it has not turned out that way.
Just my two cents..it's a good idea

Up 12 Down 0

Miles Epanhauser on Feb 12, 2020 at 9:27 pm

Think council did the right thing, hope they do not make concessions when second phase is developed.
In this case Jonathon I do not see the secrecy .

Up 12 Down 0

Max Mack on Feb 12, 2020 at 7:58 pm

Is there any commitment by KBC Developments to maintain residency quotas? Has CoW done due diligence?

Otherwise, after getting all kinds of breaks from CoW, KBC might simply fill their facilities with younger tenants.

Up 6 Down 33

My Opinion on Feb 12, 2020 at 11:47 am

Settle down Mr. Colby. Your NIMBYism is showing. I doubt people who require supportive housing will have many vehicles, let alone any. How many do you have?

Up 31 Down 2

drum on Feb 11, 2020 at 8:00 pm

They think old people do not have cars!!!!!! Insulting!!

Up 31 Down 10

Jonathan Colby on Feb 11, 2020 at 3:29 pm

The secrecy surrounding this project is still a major concern, and not very neighborly. Moreover, If this means Phase 2 gets rubber-stamped, without having to expand parking to accommodate its own requirements, Mr. Borud is going to have hell to pay.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.