Photo by Vince Fedoroff
TEMPORARY DIGS – Cheyenne, seen Thursday afternoon, is boarding at the Mae Bachur Animal Shelter until her owner returns. Seann Springford Hoby Irwin
Photo by Vince Fedoroff
TEMPORARY DIGS – Cheyenne, seen Thursday afternoon, is boarding at the Mae Bachur Animal Shelter until her owner returns. Seann Springford Hoby Irwin
The Humane Society Yukon has another new president and is putting out a public plea for help.
The Humane Society Yukon has another new president and is putting out a public plea for help.
Hoby Irwin moved up the ranks from vice-president to president late last month when then-president Seann Springford stepped down.
Springford had been elected in December 2012 during a court-ordered annual general meeting amid significant controversy for the organization.
He said Thursday he quit for personal reasons which had nothing to do with the 14-year-old Mae Bachur Animal Shelter.
That means Irwin, who took on the role of vice-president at the December meeting, moved into the role of president.
On Thursday, he said he will see the position through until the expected special AGM in April. At that point, it's anticipated the society will be back in good standing with the Yukon government.
Serving in the role of president and working to get the society, which operates the shelter, back on track takes up about four evenings a week and another half-day on weekends.
All the financial information the new board could obtain is now with accountants, who are auditing what financial records could be found.
"We're all suffering from this lack of information,” he said.
Until the shelter is in good standing, it cannot host certain fund-raisers which require a licence – bingos, silent auctions, raffles and so on.
Those fund-raisers have been a major source of operating dollars for the society, with bingo alone bringing in $100,000 each year.
The Yukon government handed over almost $40,000 in funding that had been withheld initially.
In January, the Department of Community Services decided the society had begun to move in the right direction to provide the funding.
That money was gone within the day, as the oldest bills owing were paid off first, Irwin noted.
"We're treading water very rapidly,” he said.
He is confident that with time and effort, that will be turned around, and the society's charitable status regained.
Both he and shelter administrator Amanda Farrell said facility staff are grateful for any donations that come in.
It's those contributions which are keeping the shelter going day-to-day, with most of the money going to wages for the seven staffers (three full-time, three part-time and one casual).
Donations, it was stressed, aren't going to the legal fees for the two court cases involving the shelter, as those are covered through insurance.
Estimating the cost of running the shelter from between $25,000 to $30,000 each month for the 20 animals living there now, Farrell said any help is appreciated – whether it's cash, supplies or a household adopting a new pet.
Those wanting to provide cash for a particular cause such as a spay or neuter can also specify where they want their money to go, and it will be directed there.
As Farrell noted, there are still many bills owing for veterinarians' services, heating oil and so on, in addition to day-to-day expenses like staff wages.
”We'd love some help,” she said.
The society suggested those wanting to contribute can donate directly to the society, visit The Feed Store and donate to the shelter account there for future supplies, become a society member for $20, or bring in Canadian Tire money and Extra Food receipts.
Shelter boosters can also consider taking out a corporate sponsorship, adopt an animal or host a fund-raiser.
See commentary.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (8)
Up 0 Down 0
north_of_60 on Mar 20, 2013 at 2:15 pm
"City should fund spay/neuter/cull program"
Yes, and that's the ONLY funding the shelter should receive from CoW taxpayers. The Trevor incident proved that 'animal lovers' are irresponsible with tax dollars. Exist on donations from supporters or 'cull the herd'.
Up 0 Down 0
Bob Graham on Mar 20, 2013 at 1:33 am
Monthly expenses seem awfully high to care for 20 animals. At high end, that's $1500/mos per animal! However, compared to tax money going to a ski facility rather then animal care, I vote animals! However, why 7 employees for 20 animals? Maybe the business model is unreasonable? Can't get my mind around, why so many people, President, VP, BOD's, employees needed to care for so few animals? A farmer usually cares for many more animals, feeds, cleans up, vet bills & it takes one person?
Up 0 Down 0
are you kidding? on Mar 19, 2013 at 11:42 am
the animal shelter already gets a boatload from the Yukon government. I say the same concept holds true as for Sima - people that want it can pay. Maybe then they will think twice about whether keeping unadoptable dogs at the shelter for years is the the right thing to do.
Up 0 Down 0
tired of the complaining on Mar 19, 2013 at 9:51 am
@dog owner....have you ever volunteered at the shelter? The staff is there not only to do adoptions and such but to socialize and love and care for these animals. Society does not want them but they are still living beings that deserve to feel loved and cared for. Not just physically which is what I suspect the 2 people that you know do.
People need to quit complaining about whats going on there and start coming up with some real ideas!
Up 0 Down 0
dog owner on Mar 19, 2013 at 5:38 am
At our place, two people look after 24 race dogs and 17 retired and other dogs, that is 41 dogs in total. They are fed twice a day, the yard is cleaned once a day, and they are run or excercised in the yard under supervised free running each day.
Why does it take the shelter 7 staff to do care for the same number of animals? I understand that they are also doing adoption processes, but we also have other responsibilities and jobs which we manage on top of caring for our animals.
I have seen the numbers for the vet bills as well, and believe that they are way out of line.
There needs to be a review of what is going on around there, not just whether their statements are audited but do they really need to be spending this much at vet clinics? Do they really need 7 staff, plus volunteers and a board of directors on top?
Just had to say what's on my mind to give some perspective.
Up 0 Down 0
Atom on Mar 19, 2013 at 4:25 am
.....Trevor already ate all the charity the City should offer to lost and abused mutts....City should fund spay/neuter/cull program....annually.
Up 0 Down 0
Denise G on Mar 18, 2013 at 8:58 am
My thoughts are exactly the same as that of the poster PL. The city should give core funding to the Shelter.
Up 0 Down 0
PL on Mar 15, 2013 at 8:32 am
OK..this should make for a an interesting decision for the COW. Do they give core funding to Mt. Sima or do they give core funding to the shelter.
Bit of a no brainier if you ask me. Shelter wins hands down.