Snowmobilers need tighter leash: submission
The city task force considering the snow machine bylaw has been given another document to consider with Keith Lay's 14-page submission to the group.
The city task force considering the snow machine bylaw has been given another document to consider with Keith Lay's 14-page submission to the group.
In the submission filed last week, Lay points to a number of issues surrounding snow machine use in the city.
The long-time outdoors enthusiast argues it's too early for such a task force to be set up, with the legislature's committee on off-road vehicle (ORV) use to release its findings and concerns around enforcement, snowmobile use in protected areas, the age of drivers and helmet use.
Quoting extensively from the city's Protected Areas Bylaw, Lay told officials snowmobiles shouldn't be allowed in any protected areas in town and fines should be increased to better discourage violators of the bylaw.
"One only needs to drive down Porter Creek's Mountainview Drive in the summer to see the damage caused by snowmobiles to a so-called Protected Area,” he wrote.
"(The city) has abrogated its responsibilities with regard to the bylaw, as it allows ORVs that are currently prohibited to operate freely in the area. Even the Protected Area signs that used to be visible along the road have long since disappeared.”
Current regulations require any snowmobile drivers on territorial land to be 16 or older. However, Lay noted there's no enforcement of the regulation either by the city or territory.
In any case, the minimum age for operating a snow machine whether supervised or unsupervised on or off highways should be 16, he continued, citing the Canadian Pediatric Society's Recommendations for Snowmobile Safety.
Further documents from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, a study by the Mayo Clinic and Safe Kids Canada were also cited in Lay's argument for the age restriction.
"The evidence is clear,” he wrote. "No one under the age of 16 should be permitted to drive snowmobiles even if under the supervision of an adult. How can an adult effectively supervise an underage drive if the adult is on his/her own vehicle?
"Doing so may well put both the underage driver and the adult at risk for an accident. The city and the Government of Yukon should ensure that the operation of snowmobiles (and, for that matter all ORVs) is restricted to those 16 years of age and older.”
Lay went on to take issue with arguments by snowmobile manufacturers, retailers and clubs suggesting that education rather than regulation is the answer to a number of issues that continue to arise.
Some advertisements, he pointed out, do nothing to encourage environmental protection or the responsible use of snow machines.
Drivers should be required to take training, he suggested.
A number of issues too would already be addressed if the city and territory enforced their own laws and legislation around insurance and registration, highways and so on.
He then went on to point out city policies that appear in conflict with allowing off-road vehicles on multi-use trails.
"The city can hardly claim that it promotes active living if it allows ORVs to access multi-use trails which it maintains,” he wrote. "The potential for accidents is much increased.”
Governments, he continued, shouldn't be promoting motorized recreational activities at the expenses of non-motorized activities, but rather putting tax dollars behind those that are of a greater health benefit to citizens.
"Yet one of the issues the task force is addressing is ‘recreational opportunities for snowmobile riders.' ”
Finally, pointing to other jurisdictions in the country, Lay argued: "There is a growing frustration in Canada with regard to the use of snowmobiles and other ORVs in both urban and backcountry areas.
"It is hoped that the snowmobile task force will effectively address some of that frustration by providing more effective regulation and enforcement within the City of Whitehorse.”
In an interview this morning, Dave Pruden, the city's bylaw enforcement manager, said many of Lay's comments are already being considered by the task force (made up of retailers, user groups and community organizations such as the Yukon Conservation Society), which has had two meetings since it started work earlier this year.
Also to be considered will be the results of a survey the city is having done to gauge the community's views on snowmobile use. The survey is being conducted by DataPath Systems of Marsh Lake and is designed to be statistically valid.
"It's not just about the task force,” Pruden said.
As of this morning, he had not seen any results of the survey.
While Lay believes it's too early for such a task force to be established, Pruden noted it will ultimately be up to council to make any changes out of the report that comes forward.
"At the end of the day, it's council's decision to move forward,” he said.
It's expected the task force's final report will be submitted to council in March.
Comments (9)
Up 0 Down 0
Anthony on Feb 28, 2011 at 7:20 am
Northone
It is agreed that enforcement does cost money. There are a number of ways to do at least partially fund this via user pay models:
Licensing and registration fees for the thousands of machines currently 'free wheeling' would be one source.
Court fines and auctions from seized vehicle would be an additional source of revenue.
Up 0 Down 0
ATV RIDER on Feb 24, 2011 at 2:19 am
Anthony,
Yes we do need the trailer full of ATVs, as some of us have our quads registered and licensed and like to go off into the woods for rides. Not all of us burn down the roads or campgrounds. Some of us even unload our quads outside of the campgrounds.
The biggest issue that I have seen is parents who let their children under the age of 16 drive the quads in town and they have no driving experience. I think those parents who let their children drive these machines in town should be held responsible. Just because I own and drive a quad does not mean that I go out and rip up the land. Please remember that there are many RESPONSIBLE drivers out there!
Up 0 Down 0
Jack Frost on Feb 23, 2011 at 3:38 pm
Its really funny how people continue to worry about things that affect nothing. "Genetically Modified Food" that you feed your kids, mines who poison our environment, stuff that affects all of us. You people are no-where to be found. Who cares about some tracks in the woods, that affects no one except your feelings. It doesn't affect the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat. So why do you people make it your life mission to worry about the "nothings" in life? Your apathy is a threat to our very existence, but you could care less.
Up 0 Down 0
northone on Feb 23, 2011 at 10:16 am
Anthony - it may come as a surprise to you, but there have been regulations affecting snowmobile use in the city for many, many years. Those that ignore the existing regulations will continue to ignore new regulations, simply because any meaningful enforcement is not viable in such a large landbase with as many trails as Whitehorse has.
Strong regulations are meaningless without the enforcement to back them up. Given the unlikely scenario that the city will invest in drastically increased enforcement on the trail network, education remains the most effective means of changing the bad behaviour of the small minority of snowmobilers that are inconsiderate.
Up 0 Down 0
Anthony on Feb 23, 2011 at 6:34 am
Regulation will come.
You could argue that 95% of automobile drivers drive within the law but the 5% that don't are the ones that triggered regulation. No different for off roaders with the exception that you will now be held accountable for your actions.
We've all seen these cement heads tearing up greenbelts and speeding around city streets.
We've all heard them tearing through neighbourhoods at night with their performance (read: LOUD) exhaust.
We've all read about them killing and maiming themselves and others.
This legislation is long overdue.
On a related note do you really need a trailer full of quads in a Territorial campground? Seriously, Yukon Environment needs to outlaw those things from campgrounds.
Up 0 Down 0
northone on Feb 21, 2011 at 1:22 pm
Sad to see such a radical end of the spectrum being given so much media play. Seems some will not be satisfied until motorized recreation is banned from the city and beyond. This view does not represent the majority. Most of us think the trails can be shared.
Up 0 Down 0
John Calaghan on Feb 21, 2011 at 12:06 pm
Yes it seems the educators have given up, note also the trails only group. I wouldn't want to go to their schools.
Don't sell yourself short, we never stop learning. We can do this without government.
Up 0 Down 0
Yukon Billy on Feb 21, 2011 at 9:43 am
How about a noise law. Snowmobile and motorcycle manufacturers should be forced to put mufflers on their machines - that work!
Up 0 Down 0
gord reed on Feb 21, 2011 at 8:37 am
Seems funny to read this former educator say education is not the key so turn to regulation