Photo by Whitehorse Star
SCENE OF CONTENTION – Developer Craig Tuton wants to build multi-residential housing on this lot at the corner of Centennial Street and 12th Avenue. The existing abandoned house and garage would be removed.
Photo by Whitehorse Star
SCENE OF CONTENTION – Developer Craig Tuton wants to build multi-residential housing on this lot at the corner of Centennial Street and 12th Avenue. The existing abandoned house and garage would be removed.
The city will sign off on a development agreement for a planned six-plex on Centennial Street, but the rezoning is still in question.
The city will sign off on a development agreement for a planned six-plex on Centennial Street, but the rezoning is still in question.
"The rezoning is not a slam-dunk,” Coun. Betty Irwin said Wednesday.
She spoke after voting with the rest of council in favour of the development agreement for 1204 Centennial St., at the corner of 12th Avenue, at Tuesday evening's council meeting.
Council had put off second and third readings of a rezoning bylaw that would see the site move from a single-detached zone to multi-family after the proposed development raised the ire of neighbours.
Instead, it opted to get the development agreement done first in order to have restrictions on the property designed to help address the concerns of nearby residents.
One neighbour, however, says the pact the city has decided to sign is not a development agreement at all.
"There's some guidelines, but no development agreement,” Cam Kos said in an interview after Tuesday night's meeting.
Under the agreement, developer Craig Tuton would be restricted to six units and a maximum building height of 9.15 metres (30 feet), and be required to provide a buffer on the east side of the property to retain trees.
Residents continued to argue last week that even with the restrictions, a six-plex would change the character of the neighbourhood and could set a precedent for developments in other areas of town.
Neighbours like Kos have suggested if Tuton wants to redevelop it, the property should be subdivided with duplexes built to maintain the character of the neighbourhood. That option would still allow Tuton six units on the site.
Council members had the overall need for housing in the city on their minds as they voted in favour of the development agreement.
"Council has to look at the overall community,” said Mayor Bev Buckway, who attended the meeting by conference call. She cited the city's sustainability plan and the need for higher-density developments.
If the project is given half a chance, Coun. Flo Roberts stated, she's confident it would be a success.
Coun. Dave Stockdale, meanwhile, noted the city has to adapt to changing circumstances.
"Things have changed,” he said, adding he believes the development agreement satisfies a number of concerns brought forward by the neighbours.
Though Irwin and Coun. Dave Austin also supported the agreement, both indicated that support may not last through the whole process.
Austin said he is adamantly opposed to the property entrance being off 12th Avenue, which he suggested as unsafe, though that is a matter set to be dealt with in further planning stages.
As long as the exit is proposed for 12th Avenue, Austin said, he won't support the development further.
Irwin said that while she'll support the development agreement, she isn't likely to support the rezoning.
She explained Wednesday she sees the development agreement and rezoning as being separate issues.
The agreement was likely to pass anyway, she said.
With the pact now passed, Irwin said she wants to speak with residents before the Oct. 25 vote on second and third readings of the rezoning.
"I haven't heard one resident in favour,” she said, arguing the city should be listening to its residents.
Although the city needs housing, especially affordable rental housing, she noted, a six-plex isn't likely to address that need in any major way.
And the $1,200 to $1,500 a month the developer has suggested would likely be charged on the units is not what Irwin would deem affordable housing.
"That's not diminishing the crisis,” she noted.
There are other, more suitable sites in the city for such development, Irwin added, and other options for rental accommodation on the property through subdivision and building duplexes.
"We can't just ignore the residents' concerns,” Irwin said.
Coun. Doug Graham was absent from Tuesday's meeting.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (3)
Up 0 Down 0
Cindy Loverin on Oct 15, 2010 at 8:05 am
so glad that the City listened to reasoning instead of the multiple nimbee's complaints over improvements and development. In a time where the vacancy rate is at it's lowest and the need for family housing is increasing it's nice to see that someone is listening. I live in Porter Creek, and one less junkie old house being replaced by modern homes is welcome and will improve the value of the lots around it.
Up 0 Down 0
Miriam Smith on Oct 15, 2010 at 4:07 am
I was fortunate enough to find rental accommodations in the Porter Creek area, and one of the benefits is truly how the neighborhood is set up. However with rental fees what they are - I cannot sustain the home on my own. There have been duplex's recently added, (No I do not rent one of them) that have not created the problems some people have noted as concerns. Although they are not situated at the corner like this one will be. The point I would like to agree with and emphasize is Couns. Irwin's point that it will not have an impact on offering AFFORDABLE housing at $1200 - $1500/mo plus utilities. Even for people with above average salaries, who are single income families, this is unsustainable when you factor in other living costs, transportation and increasing school fees/activities etc. It is unfortunate that some sort of middle ground cannot be found.
Up 0 Down 0
YukonHomeOwner on Oct 14, 2010 at 8:21 am
It is so nice to see that the city council listens to the homeowners......NOT!!!! You want more housing put it in the Whistle Bend. The residents around the property do not want the six plex, why wont you listen?