Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Norman LaRue

Shocked defence lawyer plans to appeal

After a three-month trial in Yukon Supreme Court, Norman LaRue has been found guilty of first-degree murder.

By Ashley Joannou on July 3, 2013

After a three-month trial in Yukon Supreme Court, Norman LaRue has been found guilty of first-degree murder.

The 30-year old from Kamloops, B.C., heard the verdict this morning.

The conviction brings with it a mandatory life sentence without the eligibility for parole for 25 years.

LaRue did not acknowledge Justice Scott Brooker when asked if he had anything to say.

He did not stand when the judge left the courtroom.

Brooker called the murder of 63-year-old Gordon Seybold "brutal and senseless.

"You invaded the sanctity of Mr. Seybold's home and then killed him.”

The verdict was read to a courtroom which included members of the RCMP, Yukon Legal Aid and the public.

Outside the courtroom, LaRue's lawyer, Ray Dieno, said he was shocked by the verdict and plans to appeal as soon as possible.

"I think the judge got in wrong, in terms of, he should have taken first-degree off the table,” he said. "The evidence on first-degree was so scant, that to me it was a clear error.”

Right before his client took the stand in his own defence last month, Dieno argued the judge should remove the option of a first-degree murder conviction.

He said procecutors David McWhinnie and Bonnie Mcdonald had not done enough to prove the planning and deliberation required for first-degree murder.

In the end, Brooker denied the application, ruling it was not up to the judge to weight the evidence.

LaRue is "very upset, very emotional. It was not expected,” his lawyer said.

Dieno said he thought a conviction of second-degree murder was more likely.

What little was left of Seybold's body was found in the charred remains of his Ibex Valley home on March 26, 2008. The fire destroyed most of the evidence and made it impossible for investigators to say for sure exactly how the Yukoner died.

On the day of the fire, a bloody bat and rifles were found at a rest stop about 11 kilometres from the Seybold's property.

Much of the trial centred around an extensive RCMP undercover operation — Project Monsoon — and secretly-recorded conversations between LaRue, his then-girlfriend Christina Asp, and the undercover officers.

The "Mr. Big” style investigation convinced the couple undercover officers were actually powerful criminals with the ability to cover up crimes.

In one of the recordings, LaRue tells the officer he beat Seybold with a baseball bat, slitting his throat ear to ear and lit his home on fire.

On the stand in his own defence, LaRue told the jury he had been lying.

He denied ever being involved in Seybold's death and said he doesn't know who was.

He testified Asp smuggled a secret letter to him while he was in jail which outlined what she had told the criminals and asked him to memorize it.

LaRue insisted he didn't want to be involved with the criminals but went along with it to please Asp and hopefully convince her to leave the life of crime.

He said he was afraid and just telling the undercover officers what he thought they wanted to hear.

Asp was convicted of second-degree murder last year.

She refused to testify during LaRue's trial and was cited for contempt. A court date on that charge has not been set.

Because Asp did not testify, LaRue's lawyer did not get a chance to cross-examine her.

Recordings of her describing to undercover officers how she and LaRue killed Seybold were played in court.

The jury also heard a recording of Asp's testimony during her own trial. When she took the stand that time, she placed all the blame on LaRue and insisted she had exaggerated her role.

Both Asp and LaRue have criminal histories and were on the run from parole when they arrived in the Yukon at the time of Seybold's death.

Asp pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the 2004 death of her common-law partner, Keith Blanchard, after plunging a 13-inch knife six inches into his chest.

LaRue is a convicted sex offender, but much of his criminal history was kept from the jury.

In 2003, he was sentenced to 5 1/2 years in custody after he used a knife to slash the throat of a woman while he was sexually assaulting her.

The attack was nearly fatal, with wounds coming close to her jugular vein, according to parole documents obtained by the Star.

"She blacked out, and when she came to, discovered that she had been partially disrobed,” say parole documents dated July 17, 2009.

"You were laying on top of her holding a knife. She attempted to fight you off, which angered you, and you slashed her throat.

"In her attempt to defend herself, she received cuts to her fingers and wrists. The victim was also punched in the head while you held a pillow over her face; she suffocated to the point where she might pass out.”

Prosecutors at the time attempted to have him classified as a dangerous offender.

Instead, he was deemed a long-term offender, meaning he was to be monitored by the Correctional Services of Canada for 10 years after his release.

After going on the run from parole at the time of Seybold's death, LaRue was arrested on a Canada-wide warrant and ordered to serve the entirety of his remaining sentence.

In parole documents from November 2008, months after Seybold died, the parole board writes: "The board is satisfied that, if released, you are likely to commit an offence causing the death of, or serious harm to another person before the expiration of your sentence, you are now serving according to law.”

LaRue was 20 years old and incarcerated in 2003 when he and two other inmates allegedly stabbed a fourth man.

"There is information to suggest this incident was gang-related.” the 2008 document says.

In that same document, the board notes that LaRue "made a pledge in the sweatlodge that you will not be violent towards others.

"You feel proud that you have met this goal starting with your withdrawal from your gang affiliation several years ago.”

LaRue's criminal history shows a "propensity to use violence,” the documents say.

LaRue is said to have an anti-social personality disorder, conduct disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

He was released to a Calgary halfway house at the end of July 2009.

There, he would first come face-to-face with the undercover officers who had spent months befriending Asp.

He would not be out in the public for long. Both Asp and LaRue were arrested for murder on Aug. 4, 2009, 16 months after Seybold died.

About 1,300 summonses were sent out to potential jurors for this trial, the most ever in the territory.

The trial had been designated a megatrial because of its likely length.

As a result, 14 people sat on the jury.

The decision was a good one. Before the trial was over, two jury members were excused for medical reasons.

See related story

Comments (15)

Up 1 Down 0

Sabina on Nov 3, 2015 at 9:25 am

How do you explain wrongfully convicted? They had evidence against them and crown worked hard to convict them. And if this country had the death penalty we would be killing a lot of innocent people. I am not speaking of this specific case but over all. In this system, money talks (in Gods eyes, the one who lies, steals, kills or breaks any one of the Ten Commandments is just as guilty as the murderer. Why? Because it was sin that crucified Jesus. Little or big, it is a sin and God does not look at the level of one that's higher than the other. They need forgiveness.

Up 0 Down 0

RIP Gordon on Jul 8, 2013 at 4:17 pm

Thank you to the judge & jury for seeing the truth! Sadly, there will never be real justice in this case.

We have NO sympathy for these violent killers Norman Larue & Christine Asp!!!! They never should see freedom! Life in prison is what they deserve and more! What they did was the worst violation of a persons safety & sanctuary, a home invasion, the horrific murder-it was all so terribly hard to accept then as it is today, that these two murdered our beloved friend Gordon!

There will never be another Gordie. He was loved. He is missed by many. I hope Gordie's ghost torments Norman,Christine for the rest of their lives.

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Jul 6, 2013 at 9:37 pm

The Canadian version of "life" is as harsh as it gets up here, so yes I was surprised too. I figured he'd pull Gladue and do a few weekends playing video games. If we still had gallows here in Canada, he'd be a great one for a neck tie...and his lil' missus too.

Based on what I know, both of them were consuming oxygen better suited for a plant.

At least plants serve a purpose on this orb, he and his sweetie do not.

Up 0 Down 0

ben jacobs on Jul 6, 2013 at 4:54 am

Was there ever any doubt, really?

When a person's defense largely consists of technicalities concerning evidence, instead of "I didn't do it", you really have to wonder.

If poor old stormin Norman is feeling "shocked and upset", he can at least take comfort in the fact that he's feeling a whole lot better than Gordon Seybold.

Up 0 Down 0

Just Say'in on Jul 5, 2013 at 4:02 pm

Why is that an animal like this is entitled to this kind of defence and associated expense. I understand he is due his right to justice however that should not mean an unlimited time and expense. His defence attorney should be there to be sure that he is able to receive due process and that is it. Why is he trying to get him off. Is that what we want? I can't believe that both of these creeps have criminal records and that is not admissible evidence. That is info that the jury absolutely should be privy to. What is our (Justice) rather Legal system coming to?

Up 0 Down 0

Groucho d'North on Jul 5, 2013 at 9:36 am

Shocked defence lawyer plans to appeal. I would think this cow is well milked by now - go back to chasing ambulances.

Too bad we have a legal industry rather than a justice system, although in this case Justice did triumph; well done, and thanks to all the jurors who had to endure the proceedings.

Up 0 Down 0

shocked?!?! on Jul 4, 2013 at 9:58 am

The only shock is the loop holes in the CCC that allows degenerates like Larue out to re offend. I am all for rehab of minor offences, but offences of violence and sexual in nature should be a 1 time occurrence. If you can not play nice then your first finding of guilt should result in life sentences. Where are they advocates fro public interest and protection of society. This animal was relased with a very poor prognosis and high risk to reoffend violently. This murder was predicted and the Canadian Law makers should be held as co occused. Disgusted!! Take your shock and chat up the victims families. As for Larue I am hopeful he will be the victim of some unfortunate incident and get what his victims wish for him and long painful death.

Up 0 Down 0

oicu812 on Jul 4, 2013 at 9:24 am

Note to Norm and his buddy. Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out. Wait a minute, maybe it should!

Up 0 Down 0

CJ on Jul 4, 2013 at 2:47 am

You have to hand it to the lawyer, he really threw himself into the defense. Just one problem -- the guy's guilty and dangerous and needs to be taken off the streets.

May he never get out of prison, and may the lawyer find clients more worthy of his talents.

Up 0 Down 0

Julius Caesar on Jul 4, 2013 at 12:37 am

Justice is well served (this time), but too late. Given the facts of the sex assault he should have received at least 20 years then. The problem with this justice system is that people get branded as criminals for minor things, like drinking and breaching bail conditions, but for the real serious stuff they get Mickey Mouse sentences. The guy keeping a few pot plants can now end up with a longer sentence than a violent offender. What type of logic is that?

Up 0 Down 0

karen nicloux on Jul 3, 2013 at 1:21 pm

God bless Prosecutors for doing such an awesome, awesome , awesome JOB!!! Hope they get a nice, long, well deserved paid Holiday

Up 0 Down 0

rellik on Jul 3, 2013 at 11:30 am

Glad to get this murderer off the street, great work RCMP and Crown

Up 0 Down 0

Stan Rogers on Jul 3, 2013 at 9:34 am

Shocked defence lawyer plans to appeal. It should have read stunned defence lawyer.

He was judged by a jury based on the evidence.

An appeal or multiple appeals will waste time and effort. To invade and kill a person in their home is terrible- life in prison, not 25 years is warranted.

Up 1 Down 0

bobby bitman on Jul 3, 2013 at 9:09 am

Now poor little Normie is emotional and upset. He didn't expect this result at all. Gee, that is real tough. Good riddance, Why do we let these known psychopaths run loose in the first place? He was a diagnosed sociopath-psychopath-antisocial personality disorder criminal (they all mean just about the exact same thing.)

I hope he spends not just 25 years, but the rest of his life in a cell with other sex offenders and murderers because that is the company he deserves.

Up 0 Down 0

June Jackson on Jul 3, 2013 at 8:06 am

I thought he was going to get off with time served too..after all.. this IS Canada..land of lots of laws, but little justice.

In this case.. my opinion is.. justice is well served.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.