Photo by Whitehorse Star
Cam Kos and Erica Heuer
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Cam Kos and Erica Heuer
The proposal for a triplex on an undersized vacant residential lot in Riverdale received rousing support from city council at its meeting Monday night.
The proposal for a triplex on an undersized vacant residential lot in Riverdale received rousing support from city council at its meeting Monday night.
Council gave third and final reading to the required zoning amendment, as lot owner Erica Heuer clutched her hands with excitement and raised them to a full smile as she sat in the gallery.
Heuer's proposal has raised resistance from some community members who feel the development – particularly on a lot already smaller than usual – will put an added squeeze on a neighbourhood already dealing with traffic flow and such.
Members of council, however, described the proposal for McQuesten Road as an ideal solution to feed the growing housing demand with a project that is innovative and well-suited for the area.
"I am pretty excited to see this go forward because I think a building like this should really start to become the model of sustainability,” Coun. Betty Irwin said, describing her support for Heuer's triplex.
The city, the councillors agreed, is better off right now increasing density in existing neighbourhoods to take advantage of existing infrastructure as opposed to expanding more subdivisions.
"I sincerely think this is going to be a wonderful addition to the community,” said Coun. Florence Roberts.
Heuer is planning a two-storey development, with each of the three units measuring a total of 973 square feet. The design calls for high-energy efficiency, and may be eligible for a Passive House certification for its implementation of sustainable living concepts such as the collection system for rainwater and greywater to flush the toilet and water the yard.
Heuer said after the meeting she intends to begin construction in July and will be living in one of the three units.
Information put before council indicates the building will meet all other zoning requirements, such as height restriction and maximum lot coverage with all required setbacks from the property lines.
Parking will be provided at the rear through laneway access.
Porter Creek resident Cam Kos appeared before council Monday to express his concern that allowing such a development on a small residential lot could kick-start a trend by other property owners interested in investment opportunities.
The proposal may be for Riverdale, but approving it could have implications for neighbourhoods across the city, he cautioned council.
Roberts acknowledged the concerns brought forward by Riverdale residents, but also noted the city has received multiple correspondence in the last week supporting the project.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (4)
Up 0 Down 0
DG on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:43 pm
This is a great example of being between a rock and a hard place.
Darned if you do darned if you don't
We can't expand outwards that might infringe on one of the squirrels trees and we can't infill because my house won't get the same lighting boo hoo.
Crybabies... my 7 week old daughter is better behaved.
Up 0 Down 0
Scott Holmes on Mar 30, 2012 at 6:50 am
It is truly amazing to see Whitehorse residents continue to complain about the lack of affordable housing and housing alternatives and yet, at the same time, reject every proposal to assist in rectifying the situation. The NIMBY and I've got mine attitudes have got to stop.
Up 0 Down 0
Max Mack on Mar 28, 2012 at 4:04 am
I am (once again) disappointed in CoW's "rousing support", but am not at all surprised.
If council members are so wildly in favour of "densification" and "infill", I suggest they move to the Toronto area where they can experience first-hand the effects of their "progressive" policies . . .
For these are policies of the rich, by the rich and for the rich, designed to ensure that the elite retain control of prime real estate while the rest of the masses are consigned to living like rats.
Whitehorse is a tiny island in a massive sea of unpopulated land . . . there is NO need for densification and infill -- especially when these proposals are out-of-character with existing neighbourhoods.
Up 0 Down 0
Wayne on Mar 27, 2012 at 9:20 am
Where can I read the correspondence in favour of the development?