
Photo by Vince Fedoroff
SPEAKING OUT – Stephen Burles, Sibill Hackney, Glenys Baltimore, Jill Pangman and Donna Clayson (left to right) are among a number of Cowley Creek residents planning to form a new community association.
Photo by Vince Fedoroff
SPEAKING OUT – Stephen Burles, Sibill Hackney, Glenys Baltimore, Jill Pangman and Donna Clayson (left to right) are among a number of Cowley Creek residents planning to form a new community association.
Cowley Creek subdivision residents may soon have a new community association to represent their interests.
Cowley Creek subdivision residents may soon have a new community association to represent their interests.
This morning, six residents of the country residential neighbourhood stated their intentions to start up the organization in light of concerns over an amendment proposed for the Official Community Plan (OCP).
It would allow for the Yukon Horse and Rider (YHRA) Association to relocate to the former KMA Speedway site using an access from a proposed extension to Sockeye Place.
The amendment is currently with the Yukon government for ministerial approval after council voted 4-3 in favour of second reading.
It will return to council for third reading after it receives approval from the territorial minister.
This morning, the Star met with several residents for interviews about the situation. Stephen Burles explained a community association may have a stronger voice when it comes to tackling issues.
Up until now, he said, it's been individual or small groups of residents bringing forward concerns about the process that's been happening around the YHRA's relocation.
The group currently has its riding grounds in the Whistle Bend area that's slated for residential development. The city has been working with the group to find a new location, with the KMA site being pursued.
With the access to the site from the Alaska Highway deemed unsafe, the extension to Sockeye Place is proposed, and would be funded through the sales of up to five lots along the new section.
There have also been ideas for the site to be used by others and for other purposes like camping.
What began as a possible feasible idea to have the riding arena off the highway has morphed into a much bigger idea that's been poorly planned, said Doug Kerley (who was out of town and attended this morning's interview by cell phone).
And many residents are wondering why the move is proceeding so fast, with the group's current site scheduled for the later phases of development for Whistle Bend when it's only in phases one and two now, and lots sales have been slow.
"What's the rush?” Kerley questioned, a sentiment echoed by others in the neighbourhood.
"Really, there is no hurry,” Burles said.
Arguing time is needed for the entire issue to be explored, residents pointed to a number of issues around the proposal that they also presented to council prior to second reading.
"Our neighborhood's going to be hugely negatively impacted by this,” Burles said.
Noted Kerley: "The city is not following its own plan.”
He pointed out the plan designates the Cowley Creek area as future planning at the expiration of the current OCP – not now. Rather, areas north of the city are identified for potential country residential development.
The possibility of lot development for a recreational facility raises significant concerns for many in the area. As resident Jill Pangman argued this morning, it could set a precedent, thus impacting other areas of town down the road.
"Is that a reasonable use of the city's resources?” Burles questioned of the lot development. Glenys Baltimore then wondered if it's even been determined that the sale of the lots would cover the cost of the road extension.
Kerley said he'd rather see the sales revenue go into the general city coffers and potentially be used to lower taxes.
The greenspace – which many say was part of their purchasing decision along with the quiet lifestyle in choosing to buy country residential homes – would be eroded as well, it was argued.
There is also the question of environmental concerns at the former speedway site and who would pay for site assessments and any clean-up that may be required.
The residents also continued to point to a facility on the Mayo Road as a possibility for relocation.
The riding association has argued the facility, which is in the estate of Sharon Jensen, doesn't meet its competition standards.
However, the residents are quick to point to a letter from those who operate the indoor facility that notes a willingness to work with the riding association and point out that a number of events have been held there over the years.
It also states the outdoor area could accommodate an outdoor riding facility roughly the same size as the riding association's current facility.
The Cowley Creek residents noted their hope council will consider the other facility – which is already set up for horse events – before passing third reading of the OCP change.
They added they appreciate council trying to find a solution that will work for everyone involved.
In the meantime, the residents are also reviewing material to form the community association for the area.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (8)
Up 0 Down 0
Frank Pond on May 13, 2013 at 6:37 am
Cowley Creek subdivision residents may soon have a new community association to represent their interests.
Very cool but you need much more when dealing with the city. You need money and lawyers because of the inertia and dogma.
You hear uplifting things like the Official Community Plan and environmentally sensitive areas and new city parks and then a few people say they want something and the city then wants to put ATV and skidoo trails everywhere.
Have you heard about Paddys pond?
Up 0 Down 0
Josey Wales on May 11, 2013 at 2:21 am
Ya know folks...I for one am waaaaay beyond sick of resources spent appeasing special interest groups.
CoW why not use our money and your time more efficiently, I won't apologize for using the "E" word I know that frightens/offends you so.
What do I mean?...oh I don't know, maybe use it to do something that WILL benefit the entire community.
I know that concept is a abstract one for our local government, here are a few ideas.
The Whitehorse free-pour season is now upon us (like it ever "really" is seasonal), that said I went for a millennium stroll three times last week.
Everywhere I walked broken glass from our town public souses was omni present.
Adults, kids un-bothered swilling a few back in Rotary...under the bridge as trolls...on Law Island in short?
I seem to not go anywhere in the new Regina without seeing the carnage left from these losers.
We need more boots on the ground ENFORCING current laws/bylaws ASAP!
Driving in this town full of "new" and ol' local entitled morons is more like survivor than mere traffic, but yet I cannot remember the last time I seen a by-law stop a speeder...stop sign roller...or folks whom LOVE parking on the sidewalk beside the firehall on first.
The lines on our roads clearly are just guidelines and not taken seriously.
hell you could REDUCE our taxes just with fines from folks "parking" on main street...ya might as well erase THAT solid yellow.
If CoW actually enforced the myriad of by-laws it spent a gazzillion tax dollars creating? We WOULD be entitled to a tax rebate.
Why does our new mayor (Whoo freakin' HOO)need a car allowance? Set a example and use our awesome transit (sarc).
Never EVER use federal infrastructure cash on anything but our roads and sewers etc. NOT giving it to Sima.
anyone? take your best at me, call me whatever name ya wish...or support me in my efforts to regain a once nice town.
I digressed YUP, got a little wordy indeed. Do I care about 60 people and their horses?
ahhh...no!
One should not need to join a special interest group to be heard, a vote should be enough of a voice. Hear that Mayor Curtis, ya got mine...get a grip on your team please.
Up 0 Down 0
CJ on May 10, 2013 at 8:42 am
I agree with that, Bobby Bitman. I hope the next time city planners tackle a development, they're encouraged to work around existing uses, rather than razing them (the CBC tower is another example). It could have added flavor and character to a fairly brand new subdivision, instead of being perceived as an intruder when they move to a different one, especially given the scope creep of this proposal.
People tend to be more accepting of what was there before them -- the motocross track is a good example (or whatever the Cowley site was previously). It's kind of a missed opportunity.
City planners have been indulged enough in their eagerness to draw on clean slates.
Up 0 Down 0
Jackie Ward on May 10, 2013 at 5:01 am
Yes, keep it where it is in WB, lol. The smell would add character and remind people everyday that their financial decisions stink. Thank you folks, I'm here all day.
Up 0 Down 0
bobby bitman on May 9, 2013 at 8:19 am
N of 60, I was thinking the same thing. Leave the track in WB because there is plenty of time before more lots need to be developed there. Personally, I would see it as a benefit to have horse stables next door and perhaps they could add to the facility in WB to increase allure to the area.
Up 0 Down 0
north_of_60 on May 7, 2013 at 5:28 am
"The group currently has its riding grounds in the Whistle Bend area that's slated for residential development. "
Residential development of the WB site is a long way into the future, if ever. There is plenty of room in WB for both.
There is no good reason to move the horse track from the present location.
Up 0 Down 0
John Streicker on May 7, 2013 at 12:58 am
In actual fact, the OCP amendment for the KMA Speedway has not yet passed second reading and is not before the Yukon Government. It is on the Whitehorse Council agenda to come back before us on Monday 13-May for second reading.
John Streicker,
Whitehorse City Councillor
(Chair of the City Planning Committee)
Up 0 Down 0
Doug Kerley on May 6, 2013 at 11:40 am
The OCP amendment for Cowley Creek is still waiting to be heard for a second reading which is scheduled for May 13th.