
Photo by Vince Fedoroff
A MOUNTING CHALLENGE – A loader clears a residential street in February of this year. Inset Kyle Morrison, Tracy Allen.
Photo by Vince Fedoroff
A MOUNTING CHALLENGE – A loader clears a residential street in February of this year. Inset Kyle Morrison, Tracy Allen.
While it wasn’t the classic snow job, it might be loosely described as a lightning-fast response.
While it wasn’t the classic snow job, it might be loosely described as a lightning-fast response.
On Monday evening – mere hours after the season’s first lasting snowfall snarled morning commuter traffic – city council approved a revised ice and snow control policy.
Termed an attempt to “consolidate and simplify” the vital service while reducing its cost, the updated approach gives on-the-streets equipment operators more flexibility in determining the most urgent tasks.
The changes were partially triggered by greater snowfall amounts and the dawn of the sprawling Whistle Bend subdivision, which will continue to grow significantly in the coming years.
Under the previous policy, streets had to be cleared on a strictly ordered basis, in numbered priorities.
Now, though major arteries and bus routes will continue to top the list during and after a snowfall, equipment operators can use their discretion to a greater extent.
An example would be a grader driver immediately smoothing over some potentially dangerous snow and ice ruts he or she sees while passing a given street – leeway that wasn’t possible under the old policy.
At a briefing held Tuesday afternoon at city hall, Tracy Allen, the city’s operations director, shared the results of a What We Heard public engagement exercise the city conducted after successive above-average snow seasons. The survey was based on activities under the previous snow and ice control policy.
The feedback involved 1,884 participants/viewers and 914 responses from all areas of the city. It’s the highest level of that type of public engagement the city has ever seen, Allen said.
Top issues included increasing the snow removal budget and improving communication with the public, such as providing faster notice of when a given neighbourhood will be cleared.
The survey found less than 10 per cent of the respondents are satisfied or very satisfied with the level of service on residential roadways. Forty-six per cent are very dissatisfied, and 29 per cent are dissatisfied.
However, 68 per cent are satisfied or very satisfied with the level of service on major and arterial roads, known as priorities one and two under the old policy.
Less than 20 per cent of respondents are satisfied or very satisfied with the standard of snow and ice control on active transportation routes.
Concerns for respondents include the length of time windrows remain in the centre of streets before they’re taken away and the consequent reduced visibility for motorists and pedestrians.
Other issues are better traction control, clearing bus stops, quicker response times by crews and the enforcement of the sidewalk clearing bylaw.
“There was a lot of feedback and frustration” about sidewalks not being cleared in front of people’s homes, Allen told the briefing.
In removing snow, home owners must keep it on their properties or have it hauled away – it cannot be snowblown or shovelled onto streets and sidewalks. Ice and snow must be cleared down to the surface of the public sidewalk within 48 hours of a snowfall.
Businesses, meanwhile, must have the sidewalk in front of their establishments, sidewalk para-ramps, lane crossings and parking spots for motorists with disabilities cleared by 11 a.m. the day after a snowfall.
Bylaw Services has added a dedicated snow and ice constable.
“Our goal this year is to get voluntary compliance and early engagement with residents and snow removal contractors,” Kyle Morrison, the city’s acting manager of Bylaw Services, told Tuesday’s briefing.
Allen was asked about the snow disposal difficulties faced by residents with small lots and driveways. City councillor Ted Laking has cited those concerns in the Whistle Bend area, with its narrow streets, for instance.
“We would encourage residents to reach out to the Transportation Department to assess options,” Allen said. “I had to have snow hauled away (from her property). That is one option.”
In terms of the importance of communication, said Morrison, “It’s important for residents to know how to report concerns if they see a violation.”
Residents can call the Bylaw Services trouble line (667-2111) to report a lack of snow clearing. The Bylaw Services office can be reached at 668-8317.
Other issues for respondents included boosting the frequency of snow removal operations; adjusting schedules, such as doing more clearing at night; and giving bike lanes and paths more attention.
Eighty-two per cent of the respondents favour ticketing and towing vehicles illegally parked in snow removal zones.
It can be time-consuming for equipment operators to have to stop their work and knock on doors to find a vehicle owner, Allen said.
Where there are numerous vehicles blocking operations, in the efficiency of time, crews may simply pull out of an area with plans to return later.
“They take great pride in their work and they are looking to get the roads and trails cleared,” Allen said.
Vehicle owners who park in a snow removal zone can now be fined $75.
“We are looking at a standing contract for tow truck operators,” Allen said. “We will re-evaluate and look at tweaks we may need.”
Survey respondents said areas for improvement include consistency in clearing trails and residential streets; noise and disruptions caused by heavy equipment; and the effectiveness of the city’s public communication methods.
Last winter saw the city budget $4.4 million for snow and ice clearing activities, including money spent on equipment. Due to the high snowfall levels, council authorized adding another $450,000 to that amount.
In 2021, the city spent $4,523,693 on snow removal, while the budget for 2022 is $4,982,793.
Staffing levels mirror those of last winter, though that could change at council’s discretion.
For the first time in years, the revised policy raises the fees charged to truckers depositing snow at the Robert Service Way snow dump.
The policy update approved by council to better align the city’s approach with its residents’ and business owners’ needs “is the first step of many,” Allen told Tuesday’s briefing.
“This is going to be an ongoing process.”
A public communication campaign is underway.
Future operations strategies could include the use of GPS technology to aid in snow clearing, and adding such attachments as snowblowing apparatus to loaders as pilot projects.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (10)
Up 6 Down 2
Anie on Oct 31, 2022 at 3:04 pm
Nathan Living - I think it is unfair to imply that, if your elderly neighbours cannot get timely assistance to clear their sidewalk, then bylaw will quickly fine them. My experience, living in Whitehorse for more than 45 years, is that bylaw has a strictly adhered to policy of education first and enforcement as a last resort. I also know of examples where bylaw has connected seniors with snow angels types of groups to help them. There are legitimate criticisms that may be argued about the snow policy and even some city staff, but you are way off base in your insinuations.
Up 12 Down 3
Bandit on Oct 29, 2022 at 9:53 pm
Let's hear a legal opinion on this matter, if you don't own the property (ie) the sidewalk in front of your property and you do shovel it and it forms ice and someone slips and sustains an injury who is liable? Or if you don't shovel it and the same situation happens are you responsible? I think my insurance covers my property up to the property line. Any free legal opinions ??? I personally plowed my street and the adjoining trail as well as the Perimeter Trail in Whistlebend for the last 8 years for the benefit of the residents because the City did not, It was the KSA and myself that looked after that trail.
Up 14 Down 0
At home in the Yukon on Oct 29, 2022 at 12:23 pm
Last year was a miserable mess! Here's hopin'.
Up 23 Down 3
Nathan Living on Oct 28, 2022 at 2:45 pm
There is an elderly couple living near us who cannot physically shovel their walkway or sidewalk. It's almost like they are not here in the winter and they struggle financially so cannot affoed to pay anyone. We of course help out but what if we are slow getting around to helping? Will someone call the City and have bylaw fine these people?
These older people are snowbound in many other ways. They cannot communicate like the highly paid city and government workers who have a sophisticated language and are always blameless for their amazing incompetence.
Where has our social decency and compassion gone? Why are basic city services largely a thing of the past. Why are city workers and our mayor and council so entitled and out of touch; they work for us after all. They do not work for a few associations who are clearly their favorite taxpayers.
Up 16 Down 6
iBrian on Oct 28, 2022 at 6:51 am
Right on, micromanage the snow, change the climate. Fine the violators.
So happy to not be a cityiot.
Up 5 Down 5
Patti Eyre on Oct 27, 2022 at 8:45 pm
Marxist liberal thinkdrain bonanzajo would says, Josi and Juni are right, now let’s carry on ya’all. But for those of us still living in reality, winter can be difficult and challenging. I do hope we’re ready for it.
Up 13 Down 6
Max Mack on Oct 27, 2022 at 8:04 pm
Have woke city administrators and their revenue-hungry councillor allies ensured that feedback is stacked?
Instead of clearing roads in a timely way, we get fines for residents, cars towed without notice, and more resources allocated to clearing 'active transporting corridors'.
Frigging bizarre.
Up 16 Down 15
Street Justice denied! on Oct 27, 2022 at 7:28 am
In many areas of Whitehorse there are only sidewalks on one side of the street. I am sick and tired of having to clear the sidewalk for my neighbours on the other side to use and enjoy at the expense of my labour.
Responsibility for clearing the sidewalks should alternate. If it’s an even year and your address is an even number then it is your responsibility and on odd years then it their responsibility.
However, you would think that in these great days of equity and fairness that they would just spend the money on sidewalks for everyone. It is this kind of inequity that fosters contempt, prejudice and hate for others…
As I stand with my shovel catching my breath amongst the warming vehicles and the fumes they are emitting into the environment I can’t help but feel that this piece of carbon is being overtaxed, economically, mentally, and physically… This is sweat disequity… I look back at my carbon footprints in the snow… And I can plainly see that some peoples journeys are more difficult than others and that it is the system itself that is to blame for the inequity of others… Some peoples journeys are more difficult than others…
I want some street Justice! It’s their turn to clear the sidewalks!
Up 27 Down 1
Revolting Ratepayer on Oct 26, 2022 at 6:05 pm
@ Tom P: I know it’s a pain when the plow does that, but I would gladly trade places with you. In the 8 years we have lived downtown, our street has been plowed perhaps 3 times. This is especially galling in consideration of the densification of downtown and the additional tax dollars there with. Somehow the city managed to keep the streets in impeccable shape all winter long when the city was almost entirely single detached households paying in. Now with manifold the revenue, it is unmanageable. I wonder what Laura & the gang do with all that extra dough? All I know is I pushed the vehicles of many a houseguest out of two feet of snow on my street last winter!
Up 51 Down 12
Tom P on Oct 26, 2022 at 3:26 pm
The city plows seems to continue to block our driveways with snow, and push snow onto the sidewalks with their plows when clearing the streets. Then the Bylaw Department wants us to remove the snow that was pushed from the road to the sidewalk onto our own property and create a swamp in the spring when it melts? I'm not sure how Bylaw would even fine a vehicle if that vehicle can't exit it's own driveway due to being blocked in by all the snow. I'll make it easy for the Bylaw Department in that the next time the city trucks block my driveway or put snow onto the sidewalk, I'll have that bundle of snow hauled over to the Bylaw Managers property to let them clear the snow properly from there. I'm all for keeping sidewalks clear - but not if they city keeps putting the snow on the sidewalk in the first place.