Photo by Whitehorse Star
Raymond Silverfox and Insp. Brendan Fitzpatrick
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Raymond Silverfox and Insp. Brendan Fitzpatrick
None of the guards or police officers who were supposed to care for Raymond Silverfox in the 13 hours before he died in police custody will face criminal charges, an RCMP investigator from B.C. said Wednesday.
None of the guards or police officers who were supposed to care for Raymond Silverfox in the 13 hours before he died in police custody will face criminal charges, an RCMP investigator from B.C. said Wednesday.
The 43-year-old Carmacks man died on Dec. 2, 2008 of blood poisoning and acute pneumonia after spending 13 hours in the Whitehorse RCMP detachment.
His treatment at the hands of civilian guards and officers has prompted a territory-wide policing review. It has also prompted disciplinary measures against those involved and a public apology from the Yukon's commanding officer, but no charges.
The announcement came as no surprise to Silverfox's daughter, Deanna-Lee Charlie. She is suing the nine officers and three guards working in the Whitehorse RCMP cell block the day Silverfox died, and applying for a judicial review of the coroner's inquest into the death.
"What can I say?” Charlie's lawyer, Susan Roothman, said in response to the announcement.
"One hopes until the end, but it's really not a surprise because I don't expect them to pursue prosecution of their own.
"My clients are very upset; this is trauma all over again.”
Insp. Brendan Fitzpatrick spoke with Roothman Wednesday morning, but told her no more than what he said to reporters in a prepared statement later that afternoon.
"After an extensive investigation in the circumstances surrounding the death of Raymond Benjamin Silverfox by the British Columbia ... major crimes section and an independent legal assessment of the investigative findings by the Public Prosecution Service of Canada, it has been determined that no
criminal charges should be laid.”
Fitzpatrick noted the investigation was reopened after audio recordings taken in the cell block came to light just days before the coroner's inquest was scheduled to begin.
Those tapes revealed what the Yukon's top Mountie, Chief Supt. Peter Clark, described as "shocking” treatment of Silverfox at the hands of RCMP officers.
In spite of the fact Silverfox vomited almost continually during his 13-hour stay in cells, he was never given any medical assistance or moved to a clean cell.
The one interaction the Carmacks man had with an officer was to ask for a mat to lay on – he was in a bare room with only a toilet and a sink – to which the officer responded: "You can sleep in your own s---.”
An hour and a half later, the watch commander pointed out that Silverfox was not moving. When officers checked his vital signs, they found no heartbeat.
He was pronounced dead at Whitehorse General Hospital.
During his press conference Wednesday, Fitzpatrick did not mention the fact Silverfox didn't receive any medical attention up to that point, but repeatedly mentioned the fact that officers performed CPR on the man while waiting for the ambulance.
Said Roothman:”If I lock someone up in my basement and that person is vomiting and that person is violently ill and I do not help them and they die, then I would be charged.”
She believes the officers are criminally responsible for not providing the necessities of life and for negligence causing death, both charges under the Criminal Code of Canada.
Asked why the officers' action, or inaction, did not meet the threshold of criminal negligence, Fitzpatrick said he could not discuss details of the case because he did not want to jeopardize the civil cases launched by Charlie.
"If there is no criminal negligence in what happened there, then I don't know what would be seen as criminal negligence by the RCMP in its own ranks,” Roothman said.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (9)
Up 0 Down 0
damien lankow on Nov 15, 2010 at 8:41 am
what a joke
Up 0 Down 0
NativeEdition on Nov 15, 2010 at 3:10 am
Yeah, your right they didn't taser him, but he still died. Which in my eye is worse. He died slowly and in one of the worst way a person can die. Andrew McGee, would you feel the same way if it was a relative of yours? I'm not a relative of Silverfox and it makes me sick the way he died.
As for Carmacks, they should be ashamed of themselves! How dare they spit in the faces of Yukon First Nations; after how far we have come! We as First Nations fought against the wrong of Residental Schools. How can Carmacks stab the back of the Yukon First Nations and re-elect their wife beating chief?!?!
I'm sad for the First Nations of Carmacks, but most of all, for the family of Silverfox. If what the RCMP did to Silverfox wasn't criminally wrong, then what is???
A very sad and embarrassed Native "Yukoner".
Up 0 Down 0
jake on Nov 14, 2010 at 5:16 am
What's the big issue anymore? This is the same first nation that just stood behind their woman beating chief, 'respected elders' re-electing him while talking about what a good man he is.
What he did was in the same category as what these officers and jail guards did, to my knowledge at least they didn't actually assault Mr. Silverfox. Why the big double standard here? If you're an elected first nation chief it's ok to do disgusting,inhumane deeds to a fellow human being but if you're a hired public servant it's not?
Why isn't there a big public outcry about the young woman who was almost killed by Eddie Skookum, why isn't her family launching civil action against Skookum and the Carmacks FN the way the Silverfox family is pursuing the RCMP and jail?
Up 0 Down 0
Don McKenzie on Nov 13, 2010 at 2:02 pm
While I understand, on one level, some of the absolute crap, the police put up with, and I believe that Mr. Silverfox was the author of most of his bad fortune, SOMEONE of the authority figures who had an interaction with Mr. Silverfox, SHOULD have taken steps to ensure he was not dying.
I could never do the job of policing or securing of prisoners. To work constantly with the negativity, and the dregs of society, would embitter me significantly. If that is what has happened with those who dealt with Mr. Silverfox, then, in my opinion, they MUST remove themselves, or be removed from their positions, or more deaths will follow.
Up 1 Down 0
Doreen Grady on Nov 13, 2010 at 9:18 am
"Protect and serve," eh?
Up 0 Down 0
Shannon Emslie on Nov 12, 2010 at 11:15 pm
While I do not reside in the Yukon at this time, this incident has made headline news all the way in the Caribbean and southern United States.
What an embarrassment for the local commander and detachment of the the RCMP.
A man lost his life, a family lost their father while on your watch!!!
How tragic it is when there is no accountability for one's actions.
The commander and the members responsible should all be arrested and charged.
Protecting their own equals corruption at its best.
Up 0 Down 0
Andrew McGee on Nov 12, 2010 at 10:12 pm
Yes, while it is tragic and completely a waste that Mr. Silverfox had to die, the guards and the police are not criminally responsible. They are being sued civilly which is where these events should be heard. And Roothman?? I would think that a lawyer would understand the requirements to prove criminal negligence. I'm just a a regular citizen and I understand it, but then again, I'm not mugging for publicity and trying to win the court of public opinion. Give the cops a break already, I don't envy them since you never hear anyone saying good job when things go right.
Up 0 Down 0
Nick Stoneburgh on Nov 12, 2010 at 1:58 pm
At least they didn't taser him.
Yes he had alcohol problems, yes he was FN but he was a human being and NO person should be left in his condition or ignored as he apparently was.
Up 0 Down 0
Helen on Nov 12, 2010 at 11:13 am
This is just sick!! How can the very people who are our public servants take someone into custody and taunt him while he lies there dying and not be held responsible?