Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Mike Ivens

Quarry proposal provokes concerns

A Crestview resident is calling on the city to require a 50- to 100-metre buffer for a proposed quarry north of the neighbourhood near Nine Mile Creek.

By Stephanie Waddell on June 17, 2015

A Crestview resident is calling on the city to require a 50- to 100-metre buffer for a proposed quarry north of the neighbourhood near Nine Mile Creek.

Mike Ivens spoke at Monday’s public hearing on the proposed rezoning of 2.75 hectares of land off the Alaska Highway to permit the quarry.

Cee & Cee Dirt and Gravel Ltd. is proposing to expand its quarry operation, currently next door, into the property.

It’s expected the new quarry section has about 190,000 cubic metres of material in it and would operate for seven to 11 years, extracting anywhere from 17,000 to 27,000 cubic metres of material every year.

In his presentation to council Monday, Ivens noted his major concern with the proposed quarry is a trail, which he described as “a huge resource for our wilderness city.”

The path is part of the Trans Canada Trail system.

While the trail is not extremely close to the proposed gravel pit, Ivens asked that the city require a buffer or setback of at least 50 metres or “ideally, 100 metres” away from the quarry area, going beyond the Official Community Plan requirement of a 30-m riparian setback.

Ivens argued a larger buffer area with trees and the like would help ensure that any garbage or waste from the quarry remained away from the trail.

A valuable hiking resource could be destroyed if the project goes ahead as it’s proposed, he argued.

Coun. Mike Gladish asked Ivens for his thoughts on potentially relocating the trail if a large buffer can’t be established.

Ivens responded by noting that such a “gesture would be welcome,” but given the steep drop-off near the trail, he doesn’t see any way it could could be moved or relocated.

Cee & Cee has been proposing extending its quarry area for some time.

Coun. Betty Irwin noted that two years ago, the company came forward with another application that was ultimately denied.

As Ivens acknowledged though, that proposal would have put the quarry between half a mile to a mile closer to the Crestview neighbourhood.

The current proposal originally identified a 4.7-ha space for the quarry.

After a review by the Yukon Environmental Socio-economic Assessment Board, however, it was reduced to the 2.75 ha now being put to council for rezoning.

The city received four written submissions on the proposal.

Valerie Anderson, the city’s acting director of corporate services, said the written submissions all expressed opposition to the rezoning.

City staff will prepare a report on the public hearing for council to review next week. Second and third readings of the rezoning are then expected to come forward for a vote at council’s June 29 meeting.

If the rezoning is adopted, the Yukon government would then finalize a lease for the land.

Cee & Cee would then be required to obtain a development permit from the city before work could begin on the site.

Comments (6)

Up 12 Down 3

BnR what are you saying? on Jun 21, 2015 at 7:10 am

BnR what are you saying? People don't understand your comments because they don't add up to nothing but negative and angry responses that add no value to the discussion about the subject.
Your new friend Wilf

Up 27 Down 1

The Pitster on Jun 19, 2015 at 11:19 am

Can anyone remember when any gravel pit didn't intrude on some special space and get the local residents up in arms?

Up 27 Down 3

Just Say'ina on Jun 18, 2015 at 10:17 pm

This is adjacent to another gravel pit and not close to houses. It is a small pit for use by a relatively small company. I think it is a great project.

Up 8 Down 33

BnR on Jun 18, 2015 at 3:00 pm

Its easy for people like Pro Science to accuse others of NIMBYism when it's not their own back yard being affected. Walk a mile in someone elses shoes as the saying goes.

Up 52 Down 12

ProScience Greenie on Jun 18, 2015 at 10:14 am

Exactly what kind of 'garbage and waste' would be produced from a gravel pit that would 'destroy' this trail? Funny how ideologues and Nimbys have to exaggerate all the time. The only thing missing is pleading - “Won't somebody please think of the children?!”

Up 11 Down 34

Alan M on Jun 17, 2015 at 9:48 pm

What I do not understand is that the minimum setback for riparian areas is usually 30M and several city documents suggest it should be much wider than 30M.

When a person or even an association steps up suggesting an area is special and a setback greater than 30M is appropriate to curtail the effects of industry or whatever, the city usually says thank you and they then go with the minimum setback.

COW, If people feel passionate about protecting trails and riparian areas please listen to them because they usually have an intimate knowledge of the importance of these areas.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.