Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Ben Asquith

Quarry proposal goes before city council

Developers proposing a quarry near Valleyview acknowledged concerns of those living closest to the site on Monday evening.

By Whitehorse Star on March 6, 2019

Developers proposing a quarry near Valleyview acknowledged concerns of those living closest to the site on Monday evening. They also highlighted their commitment to work toward mitigating those concerns.

“We know some of the citizens are concerned,” Ben Asquith, chief executive officer with the Da Daghay Development Corp., told city council during a presentation Monday night.

He emphasized that the Da Daghay Development Corp. – the business arm of the Ta’an Kwäch’än Council – is planning to hold another open house and is open to hosting more sessions if they’re needed.

Asquith also suggested the federal regulation for a minimum buffer of 15 m around the 12.2-hectare site south of Valleyview would help alleviate concerns around noise, dust and such.

As it was outlined in an administrative report brought forward to council by city planner Mike Ellis, Da Daghay has also proposed that:

• active quarrying would be limited to one month each year, with hours of operation being Monday to Friday 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.;

• dust controls that would include covering stockpiles and applying water to reduce dust travelling off site;

• a vegetative berm would be put in place along the highway to screen the quarry, help contain stockpiles, reduce noise and dust impacts and help the quarry blend in better with the area; and

• there would be regular site monitoring, a secured gate and notification signs in place around the property to ensure public safety.

“All mitigations will be reviewed as part of the future YESAB (Yukon Environmental Socio-economic Assessment Board) application for the quarry which will occur after the OCP amendment,” Ellis noted.

“YESAB may recommend additional mitigations outside of what the applicant is proposing. TKC (Ta’an Kwäch’än Council) will be the decision body for this YESAB application since the proposed activity falls on settlement land.”

In order for the development corporation to move ahead with its plans, an amendment to the city’s Official Community Plan (OCP) is needed, with council set to vote on first reading of the amendment next week.

While the OCP specifies a 300-m buffer between quarries and residential areas, the development corporation is asking for an exception to that for areas not yet developed that are next door to the site. An example is the former tank farm area.

The nearest current residential area would be Valleyview, which is about 330 m from the site.

As Ellis outlined, the change would see the OCP designation be changed from Residential-Urban to Natural Resource.

“It’s believed there’s approximately 1.6 million cubic metres of accessible gravel and sand available on the parcel,” Ellis highlighted in his report.

As Asquith said in his presentation, the quarry is expected to have a 15- to 20-year lifespan, depending on demand for material.

After that, it’s anticipated the site could be used for development.

“After the quarry, we’re really going to need to look at what is the market going to tell us at that point in time, whether it’s residential or commercial (development),” Asquith said.

In his report, Ellis highlighted portions of the OCP that note as planning for First Nations land occurs, there may be required amendments to the OCP.

As well, the city “shall continue to foster and promote positive communications with (Kwanlin Dun First Nation and TKC) on land use issues in the Whitehorse area,” Ellis said.

The city and the two local First Nations also signed a Declaration of Commitment in 2018 which emphasizes the importance of strengthening the relationship among the three governments.

A lengthy discussion by council followed, with members confirming details of the proposal and the process for the OCP amendment.

If first reading is approved next week, the public meeting would be set up ahead of a public hearing at council’s April 8 meeting.

A report on the public hearing would then come forward on April 29, with second reading set for May 6.

If second reading is approved, there would then be a 45-day ministerial review at the territorial level before it would come back for third reading.

It’s anticipated that third reading would come forward at council’s July 8 session.

Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu attended Monday’s session by conference call.

While Coun. Samson Hartland had planned to do the same, technical problems didn’t allow him to call in.

Mayor Dan Curtis acknowledged that Hartland was following the proceedings online.

Comments (9)

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Mar 12, 2019 at 4:29 pm

Oh Jason....you must be new here?
This place is fiefdom HQ depends where one is and whom one is aligned with in this PC Crusaders euphoria.

Really a mere formality, as assurances of outcome trumps any sense of community peace.
Same mentality allows the town to morph in the cesspool is currently is.
Do you actually think the ruling classes care about community cohesion?
Quite the opposite in my mere opinion.
Gravel will be haversted before solstice, says my crystal balls.

Up 45 Down 6

jason on Mar 7, 2019 at 3:50 pm

This will never pass nor should it. You live in a community called Whitehorse and the rules and regulations are there for the benefit and protection of everyone.

Up 44 Down 4

Peter Cambridge on Mar 7, 2019 at 3:22 pm

The city opposed the quarry near Miles Canyon due to noise and traffic and tourism and recreation use of the Miles Canyon road.

15 meter setback is totally unacceptable.
Please use this land for another purpose.

Up 36 Down 5

Just Sayin' on Mar 7, 2019 at 1:50 pm

Heck no. What are they going to do with the big pit after? Fill it with garbage? Also, what about the subdivision going in; the 300 meter buffer will not apply. Plus, Territorial Contracting had heck of time getting their quarries in place. How about they continue to be the land stewards and just protect the land.

Up 46 Down 4

Opposed! For what it's worth on Mar 7, 2019 at 6:00 am

A quarry right by an existing residential neighbourhood, and even closer to a soon-to-be-developed neighborhood. No matter what the mitigation plan, there will be noise, dust, large trucks. There are quarries all over the place, both in operation and potential....why is this location even being considered?

Up 31 Down 7

Joe on Mar 6, 2019 at 10:25 pm

This is the same bunch who opposed the gravel pit across the road for batch plant. Whats up with that?

Up 38 Down 6

Wat? on Mar 6, 2019 at 7:38 pm

A 15 metre sound buffer? Are these guys on glue? I could throw a whiffle ball further than that.
As far as a future development in 15-20 years...who is going to build anything in a massive pit?

Move this idea out of residential areas.

Up 39 Down 6

BnR on Mar 6, 2019 at 7:02 pm

I wonder how a similar proposal would be received if it was located next to the Ta’an Kwäch’än village near lake LaBerge.....
But I digress. Change the zoning from residential use to a quarry. That’s a mighty big change.
How about just hell no?

Up 39 Down 6

Thomas Brewer on Mar 6, 2019 at 3:42 pm

suggesting that a reduction from the existing 300m setback to 15m will acceptably control "noise, dust, and such" is farcical.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.