Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

REVAMPING IMPORTANT LAWS – Grand Chief Peter Johnston (left) of the Council of Yukon First Nations and Energy, Mines and Resources Minister John Streicker discuss the plans to modernize mining legislation during Wednesday’s news conference.

Public to be consulted on modernizing mining laws

As the Yukon’s government, First Nations and transboundary First Nations work to redevelop 125-year-old mining legislation that the territory’s grand chief calls “archaic,” the public now have the chance to have their say.

By Ethan Lycan-Lang on February 9, 2023

As the Yukon’s government, First Nations and transboundary First Nations work to redevelop 125-year-old mining legislation that the territory’s grand chief calls “archaic,” the public now have the chance to have their say.

Consultation on new legislation that will replace the Quartz and Placer Mining Acts is now open to all Yukoners for 90 days, it was announced Wednesday.

The collaborative effort to update legislation will apply new laws to every stage of future mining activity, from prospecting to mine operations to closure and remediation.

Updating existing mining legislation – or “mineral” legislation, as it’s now being called – is intended to improve resource management, environmental protections, while respecting First Nations’ and Yukoners’ relationships with the land and supporting a responsible mining industry.

The co-development of new mining legislation – or “mineral” legislation, as it’s now being called – was one of a number of recommendations prepared by the independent panel that produced the Yukon’s new Mineral Development Strategy in 2021. 

At a news conference in held Wednesday, Energy, Mines and Resources (EMR) Minister John Streicker noted that current mining legislation is behind the times.

“It hasn’t been modernized, for example, since self-government agreements, and it doesn’t really reflect those,” he said. 

The first of 11 self-government agreements between YG and First Nations governments were signed in 1993 at the time of the Umbrella Final Agreement.

The latest was signed in 2005 by the Carcross/Tagish First Nation. Three Yukon First Nations haven’t signed final agreements.

“Governments need to catch up to those obligations, those responsibilities in those agreements,” Grand Chief Peter Johnston of the Council of Yukon First Nations (CYFN) told Wednesday’s news conference.

“But at the same time, we are moving ahead, right? We’re moving ahead in a positive way. And the most important component of all of this is the community consultation.”

The public can now weigh in on the proposed approaches to mining outlined in a YG paper available online.

There is an online survey at EngageYukon.ca and community meetings will be held around the territory over the next three months, though no schedule has been finalized.

YG will release a report documenting what it heard from consultations after public engagement concludes.

Industry and environmental groups have also been included in the development process so far, and will continue to be engaged.

Johnston said the CYFN isn’t opposed to mining. First Nations communities are even interested in investing, he said, but he wants to ensure lands are properly protected and communities are compensated.

Johnston noted that current legislation goes back to “the pick and shovel days,” with individual prospectors collecting minerals with buckets.

He said outdated mining laws have impacted the environment and First Nations communities negatively over the years as technology and mining operations have evolved.

“Today, they’re moving massive excavation,” he said. “The tools have changed. So we need to change the legislation.”

Drafting of the new legislation is still in the early stages.

YG has published a “discussion paper” for new minerals legislation that includes potential approaches for each stage of the mining process.

Some of these approaches don’t have consensus from the different parties involved in the steering committee.

Representatives from the Yukon government (YG), the CYFN, Yukon First Nations and transboundary First Nations governments formed a steering committee in 2021 that has overseen work on the new mining legislation. 

Streicker gave no specific timeline Wednesday, but did say it could take years to finalize and implement new mineral laws.

He said the territory will need to plan a transition to new mineral laws, and existing mining operations likely won’t be subject to new legislation.

The government committed to jointly develop any new resource legislation with Yukon First Nations as part of the 2003 Devolution Transfer Agreement. 

Premier Ranj Pillai, then acting as the EMR minister, signed a memorandum of understanding with 11 of the territory’s First Nations, agreeing to a “one government approach” to the Yukon’s mining sector.

The co-development of new mining legislation is also part of the new Confidence and Supply Agreement signed between the Liberal government and NDP on Jan. 31. It will expire when an election is called in 2025.

The Yukon Territory has 25 of the 31 critical minerals outlined in the federal government’s critical mineral strategy. These minerals are essential to the country’s transition to green power and technology.

Though co-governance and consultation were the themes of Wednesday’s news conference, in the background was a recent decision from the Supreme Court of Yukon saying YG hadn’t properly consulted the First Nation of Na-Cho Nyak Dun before approving a 10-year gold exploration plan by Metallic Minerals Corp. in the Beaver River Watershed.

The Jan. 31 decision returns the corporation’s proposal to the evaluation stage.

Comments (15)

Up 4 Down 1

Just do what WCB did on Feb 15, 2023 at 3:04 pm

Years to develop and implement? Say what?
Why not just do what WCB did when they enacted the new combined WCB and OHS Acts?
Consult, consult, consult, don't forget the cookies, consult some more. Be sure to invite those people who need to feel important like the Union, etc. Document it all and post it on your website.
Then, just put in the legislation that was already planned from the get-go. Yes, before the coffee and cookie consultations. Did anyone other than the communications guy who posted it on the website even read any of it?
Then just RAM it through the legislature without ANY debate at all. No questions from the Opposition. Nothing. RAM IT! Just RAM IT through. Who cares about democracy? Such a lofty goal...
Success! New legislation that screws workers every which way to Sunday.
You, too, could be just like them, Mr. Streicker! Just RAM that new legislation through. Don't bother with the cookies; they conflict with the already bad taste in Yukoners' mouths from this epic failure of a government.

Up 1 Down 0

Bell on Feb 15, 2023 at 12:59 pm

Man. Politics. No one ever says a nice thing about a politician but would also likely never put themselves out there to try and help govern as one. Many aren't capable, as evidenced here and in most article postings.
Royalties are a part of every regulation for minerals in every single jurisdiction that governs extraction.
No company will walk away from their claims on the resources of the Yukon because they stand to make a huge amount of money. Legitimate royalties certainly won't scare them away.
Those worried we will run out of revenue by responsibly governing mineral extraction should chill. Government won't run of money because taxes on our everyday life continue. And there are enough hands out that those taxes and the sources taxed will increase.
There are reasons why there are so many programs paid for by taxation and royalties very much evidenced by some of the posters here.

Up 6 Down 3

Politico on Feb 14, 2023 at 12:55 pm

@ bonanzajoe Really, talk about ignoring the facts. The act hasn't been revamped for over 100 yrs. How is that a fault of the Liberals and the NDP. You do realize that there has been a Conservative government or two involved during that time? Everytime redoing the act comes around it's the Conservatives that act like Chicken Little saying any changes will kill mining in the Yukon (will not). Or do you think miners should not be responsible for cleaning up their mines and it should be left to the government? Good way to increase the size of the government!

Up 8 Down 1

YukonMax on Feb 14, 2023 at 7:28 am

I think the Yukon has "consultation fatigue" combined with a bad taste in their mouths about the last several ones.

Up 10 Down 8

bonanzajoe on Feb 10, 2023 at 4:05 pm

@Useless opinion on Feb 10, 2023.

Like the old Marine Colonel said, "You can't handle the truth".

Up 13 Down 10

bonanzajoe on Feb 10, 2023 at 4:02 pm

@Politico on Feb 9, 2023

You can thank your marxist Liberal and NDP friends for all that. Can't blame Conservatives for that mess.

Up 24 Down 32

Sure on Feb 10, 2023 at 1:11 pm

Considering that the Liberals made sure that Placer Miners would not have to pay carbon tax on the diesel and other fuels they burn, because they burn so much and they are already paying 17 cents an ounce in royalties, I don't think the placer miners have much to worry about in terms of this review.

It's pathetic and unbelievable what the placer industry gets away with in this territory. Massive ecological destruction, almost no benefit to the territory. Everything they do flies in the face of our supposed goals, and yet they are even waived through, immune to the taxes on fuel that the rest of us have to pay to heat our homes.

Up 24 Down 2

Groucho d'North on Feb 10, 2023 at 9:25 am

"Modernize" is such an ambiguous word and can morph from one purpose to another. Clear goals and objectives should lead any discussions towards a new regulatory regime. Some clarity on what are public lands and traditional territories should be addressed first with the duty to consult clearly defined.

Up 5 Down 38

Useless opinion on Feb 10, 2023 at 9:10 am

Ah the good old anti-FN rhetoric diarrhea is spewing again. Nothing new here folks.

Up 18 Down 10

Politico on Feb 9, 2023 at 5:30 pm

The territory is now closed for business, all the snowbirds and jet setters are now land locked, no fresh food, no fuel, no gas, no JOBS, no need for anything that the whiteman has brought to make everyone’s lives easier, only business will be the drug business, Mayo just proved that.

Up 49 Down 14

Mark on Feb 9, 2023 at 4:42 pm

“Streicker gave no specific timeline Wednesday, but did say it could take years to finalize and implement new mineral laws.”

Years? How many years? 2, 5, 10, 20? This does not sound well managed from day #1. In the real world there are project plans that have milestones, dependancies, a completion date, etc. Consider the implications on stakeholders of this vague commitment of taking “years” to have legislation in-place. For example, if you are a mining company or prospective shareholder how do you complete a business plan or financial model with no idea of when new legislation will be in-place and what are the obligations and costs that impact your operation?

Demand is sky rocketing for minerals critical for green power and technology. Meanwhile, back in “the” Yukon Territory, the Yukon Government and First Nations are just making announcements about kinda sorta moving forward on new legislation. The NDP and Liberals might have “confidence” in themselves, but I suspect that the mining industry has no confidence in this government or First Nations.

Let me help the Yukon Government and First Nations to establish a completion date for new legislation: May 1, 2024. Get the resources you need to implement, develop a project plan, have milestones, terminate individuals that do not perform, etc. Just do it.
——————————

“He (Streiker) said the territory will need to plan a transition to new mineral laws, and existing mining operations likely won’t be subject to new legislation.”
Someone please help me understand why existing mining operations would not be subject to new legislation.
—————————————-

Will the new legislation include an update to the royalty paid to the Territory, or can the royalty be updated any time?

The current royalty paid by placer miners is $0.375 per ounce of gold (source: Yukon.ca). The price of gold as at today is $2,507.10. The royalty cost is a minuscule 0.00015% of the price of gold. In other words it is essential free. To add insult to injury, non-Canadians set-up shop in the Yukon and we allow them to extract our resources and pay essentially nothing as a royalty. Is this justified because mining creates employment (including for non-Canadians) and miners have high expenses for fuel (ex. from the American company North 60 Petroleum)?

This government is exceptional at spending money (ex. transit fares, social housing). I suggest this government put just as much effort in collecting and maximizing revenue, and developing project plans with reasonable completion dates.

Up 55 Down 19

bonanzajoe on Feb 9, 2023 at 4:11 pm

@"grand chief calls “archaic,”?

Does that mean they are no longer relevant? Or just doesn't fit in with the FNs Reconciliation program?
Why is it when the ideological left wing NDP and Liberals get in power they have to mess with the things that bring in the most tax revenue, like mining and oil and gas. They like to spend like drunks at happy hour, but don't consider where the money comes from. The day is coming when the government well is going to dry up and they will not get anymore million dollar cheques for contributing nothing toward it. Time to smarten up.

Up 65 Down 14

Juniper Jackson on Feb 9, 2023 at 2:25 pm

What ever YTG is going to do, is already decided. Mind sharing that with us? You can skip the 'consultations'. They don't mean much when the decision is already made.

Up 49 Down 15

Politico on Feb 9, 2023 at 1:50 pm

Let's up the royalties that mining companies pay first.
Have realistic bonds so if mining companies go bankrupt mines are cleaned up with out expense to taxpayers.
Have reach through laws so even if a company goes bust the management, directors and share holders are legally required to clean up the site!
Meaningful regulations and laws forcing companies to maintain environmental regulations on their sites and quickly cleanup their spills promptly. Hefty fines if they don't.

Up 68 Down 11

George on Feb 9, 2023 at 1:00 pm

More unelected coalition deals being made outside existing legislation to buy votes .UFA’s are clear, follow the rules and stop trying to buy votes by giving out stuff to fns.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.