Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Chuck Tobin

ROAD REQUIRED, COMPANY SAYS – ATAC Resources Ltd.’s proposed road is the white squiggle above the words ‘Keno City’ in this map. The 65-kilometre artery would go from the Hanson Lakes Road to the Rackla Gold Property. Map courtesy YESAB website

Proposed road has encountered stiff dissent

The territory’s assessment board has recommended approval of a 65-kilometre,

By Chuck Tobin on May 4, 2017

The territory’s assessment board has recommended approval of a 65-kilometre, all-season road through virgin wilderness to the Rackla Gold Property northeast of Keno City.

ATAC Resources Ltd. is proposing the new access as the only viable means of continuing its advanced exploration work at its Rau Project.

The project is at the stage where heavier equipment is required along with larger volumes of fuel.

It’s not feasible to fly them in, the company maintained in its proposal to the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board.

Opposition, however, has been strong, including opposition from Environment Yukon and the Mayo District Renewable Renewable Resource Council. And serious concerns have being raised by the First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun.

Critics argue it’s inappropriate to build an all-season road to a mining project that is still in the exploration phase.

The road would create new access into wilderness areas and wildlife populations never before disturbed by vehicle traffic, they argued in submissions to the assessment board.

The road, they say, would only lead to use by more mining companies interested in areas that were never accessible before.

Supporters, on the other hand, hold up the economic development opportunities and jobs the artery would create today and in the future.

The assessment board’s designated office in Mayo issued the recommendation for approval Wednesday afternoon.

Final approval is required from both the Yukon government and the First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun, as both are designated as decision bodies for the proposal.

The two governments have 30 days to either accept, reject or alter the board’s recommendation.

ATAC Resources submitted its proposal to the assessment board last July.

The board began taking submissions from the public in late January, once it deemed it had all the necessary information required to conduct an assessment.

It also conducted public meetings in Mayo and Keno City.

Scores of submissions were received, the vast majority of them opposing the road.

ATAC Resources maintains it has conducted thorough assessments of the impact on the wilderness and wildlife, and has a means of ensuring impacts will be as minimal of possible.

Using a seasonal winter road to service the project is not feasible, particularly in times of warmer winters that create uncertainty with the required ice bridges along with the uncertainty of having the required snowfall to provide for 10 centimetres of compaction.

ATAC says it can control access, and is planning to have three gates to ensure no vehicles other than approved vehicles use the road.

If there comes a time when the road is no longer required, the company would take out all the bridges, recontour side hills excavated for road construction back to their natural slope and revegetate flat sections of the road.

The assessment board’s recommendation for approval contains six specific recommendations around the issue of controlling access, including the use of a guard house and the consideration of appropriate enforcement mechanisms.

It also recommends provisions for accessing the road take into consideration the needs of big game outfitters and trappers.

When the road is not in use, the company should be required to remove bridge decking, the assessment board recommends.

Critics say no matter how hard the effort is to control unwanted access, if people want to find a way, they will.

And at least one submission says there is no legislation in the Yukon that provides a penalty for individuals who use access roads on public Crown land without authorization.

Information officer Sue Thomas of the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources said today the department is a decision body and is not commenting on the ATAC road proposal.

It is not commenting on the suggestion there is no legislation supporting restricted use of resource access roads across Crown land, she said.

The assessment board’s recommendation also addressed the regular issues of avoiding sensitive wildlife habitat and ensuring an assessment of heritage resources along the proposed route is conducted prior to construction.

The 65-kilometre road includes improvements to 12 kilometres of existing road and 53 kilometres of new road.

The Rackla Gold Property is divided into three specific project areas: the Rau Project, the Orion Project and the Osiris Project.

ATAC is advancing it’s exploration of the Tiger deposit at part of the Rau project.

Barrick Gold Corp. and ATAC announced last month that Barrick Gold – the largest gold producer in the world – was buying into the Orion Project with an initial investment of $8.3 million.

The deal provides the option of Barrick gaining 70 per cent interest in the Orion Project by spending a further $55 million in exploration at Orion before the end of 2026, according to the announcement.

The Rackla Gold Property is about 20 kilometres south of the Peel River watershed.

Comments (14)

Up 3 Down 4

Dee on May 10, 2017 at 3:52 pm

And earthquake near the proposed ATAC Road.... http://www.earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca/recent_eq/2017/20170510.1514/index-en.php

Up 3 Down 5

Dee on May 10, 2017 at 3:46 pm

Does anyone realize the amount of earthquake activity in Central Yukon and want cyanide mines? Or does everyone not care because it's not near Whitehorse?

Up 4 Down 2

Harold on May 9, 2017 at 1:20 am

My squiggly line above the words KENO CITY is yellow.

Up 17 Down 10

Louise on May 7, 2017 at 5:40 pm

It's nice to see the Liberals opening up the way to resources and economic prosperity.

Up 21 Down 6

R Wayne Wannamaker on May 6, 2017 at 9:51 pm

My suggestion would be to have the mining companies(3) build the road to YESAB standards and put the money up front for future use to reclaim to natural state when the mining is done! This is a return that we Yukonner's don't have to pay for and those jobs will be given to Yukon first! HMMM wonder if that could happen? JMHO ....

Up 20 Down 12

Let's see if the liberal cabinet on May 5, 2017 at 4:16 pm

will approve the road or will they add so many restrictions on the construction of the road it will not take place. Or will sit on a decision for years.

Up 49 Down 7

Jack D. on May 5, 2017 at 4:04 pm

Okay - we're likely going to protect a huge area north of this area (ie. Peel River watershed) so now we also want to close off an adjacent area from development. I am a FN citizen and my family continues to work on road construction and maintenance, mineral exploration and mines, etc. C'mon - we need some balance in the Yukon. Otherwise my friends and I will have to continue to find work outside the Yukon.

Up 44 Down 11

ProScience Greenie on May 5, 2017 at 3:50 pm

How come the people that want to shut down all mining never show any compassion about the fact that these workers need to have a way to put food on the table for their families.

Up 43 Down 17

Great work on May 5, 2017 at 11:46 am

We need this for our children's future so they can come back and have a job.

Up 24 Down 50

where does it ever end on May 5, 2017 at 11:31 am

Gold mining. Why? There is zero need for more mined gold in the world, it is pure greed that motivates the industry. This road is just the start of the destruction of the ecosystems in the area. A huge price to pay for nature, so a few people can hit the jackpot.

We have to stop thinking this way and facilitating the greed.

Up 45 Down 12

ProScience Greenie on May 5, 2017 at 7:14 am

Good recommendation from YESAB. Go for it.
Zero sympathy for the outfitters that are in the business of helping Outside trophy hunters blast away at big game for big dollars. As for regular hunting by Yukoners, simple mark that area as a non-hunting zone like so many other places in the Yukon and enforce it. With gates and signage it should not be a problem. And it's easy as heck to rip up a road once there is no use for it.

Up 46 Down 15

Pro development on May 4, 2017 at 7:54 pm

It's no wonder this place has any thing going on up here...everyone wants a say in what goes on and it's always negative, if it's not on your property why would you say no to more work....this place is screwed seven ways from Sunday!

Up 43 Down 22

jc on May 4, 2017 at 5:34 pm

Most of the time the Environuts and FN don't even have a viable reason to protest progress. It's just something that goes against their grain. Time to seriously reduce the FN Budget and make them support themselves and take away all tax funding for these NGO environment organizations. Make them pay taxes out of their donations.

Up 29 Down 35

Yukoner on May 4, 2017 at 5:32 pm

So the company is promising to reclaim the road afterwards. Right.
I can think of exactly one mine that actually fulfilled their obligations with respect to reclamation work, the rest just walk.
Mining companies make big promises, but the fulfillment, not so much.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.