Photo by Whitehorse Star
Julie Frisch
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Julie Frisch
At least 328 residents from Premier Darrell Pasloski's Mountainview riding have signed a petition urging the government to ban hydraulic fracturing and liquified natural gas (LNG) in the territory, says Julie Frisch.
At least 328 residents from Premier Darrell Pasloski's Mountainview riding have signed a petition urging the government to ban hydraulic fracturing and liquified natural gas (LNG) in the territory, says Julie Frisch.
Frisch is a member of the group Yukoners Concerned about Oil and Gas Exploration/Development.
The group has been collecting signatures over the past couple of weeks, continuing downtown today, before the petition is handed over to the NDP to be tabled in the legislature.
Frisch said the group wouldn't know the total number of signatures collected until later this afternoon.
The petition reads that the proposed switch from diesel back-up generation to LNG in the territory "ties Yukon to the pursuit of fossil fuels which leads to hydraulic fracturing in Yukon and to pollution of water, land and air resources which threatens healthy ecosystems.”
It continues to argue that the switch would delay the needed transition to renewable energy and exacerbate climate change.
The petition argues that the switch to LNG would not lead to long-term cost savings because more demand for LNG would cause the gas price to rise, which in turn would lead to fracking in the Yukon to secure local sources.
Fracking in the territory, it concludes, would lead to more pollution and undermine public social health and safety, tourism, and built infrastructure such as highways.
"Therefore, the undersigned ask the legislative assembly to urge the Government of Yukon to ban LNG use by Yukon's utilities for electricity generation or distribution,” it reads.
Frisch gathered signatures in Hillcrest, which falls within Paskloski's riding.
"I'm still going to go out in Hillcrest, even though we're handing them in, and hand out information because I haven't done even half of Hillcrest, so we haven't totally covered his riding yet,” she told the Star this morning.
Most people Firsch encountered said they don't have enough information to decide whether they're for or against hydraulic fracturing.
"It's come upon them so quickly, they don't know, a lot of people don't know the connection between liquefied natural gas and fracking, so a lot of people have asked for more information,” she said.
Yukoners Concerned's petition comes in reaction to Yukon Energy's proposal to build a $42-million LNG generating plant beside Robert Service Way.
The utility company says it needs to replace its 46-year-old diesel generators because they've become unreliable.
The Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB) recommended approval of the project in its draft screening report, which was released March 19 for public review. The comment period for that report closed last week.
YESAB has not yet released its final decision. (See separate story, p. 5)
The Yukon Utilities Board, which has the authority to determine whether the cost of the project can be passed on to ratepayers, requested an extension of its mid-April deadline to report back to the government. The board now has until the end of May to reach its decision.
The premier was unavailable for comment on the petition this morning.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (9)
Up 5 Down 14
B. Foster on May 3, 2014 at 5:18 am
@north
"In it, a group of North America's top scientists advocate a go-slow approach and says industry and government need to know more about the long-term effects and environmental impacts of fracking before allowing projects to go ahead."
Your kung foo gets weaker and weaker...did you pick that up? The intelligent people reference? Here it is again "a group of North America's top scientists".
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/fracking-report-validates-environmental-concerns-in-n-w-t-1.2629503
@bnr
Way to throw the baby out with the bath water buddy. Obviously you are correct in my misuse of LNG...if it helps, go ahead and drop the L.
Yes. There is more than one way to exploit NG (better?). Sadly they are all driven by profit above all and need somewhere back in the pack.
Look y'all, I'm just an 8th grade dropout schmuck. But I come from a long line of dropouts that have been up here for 6 generations and counting. I don't have the answers and aren't always right but when it comes to big bucks pulling strings I tend to lean away from the greenback and towards the green that actually means something.
So...I'll get my digs in where I can and do the little bit I can to see our territory is not exploited by outside interests only interested in hoarding wealth at the cost of those who actually live here and hope to see the Yukon remains the jewel it is.
Apologies in advance to @just sayin' for losing him after the second paragraph.
Up 18 Down 2
BnR on May 3, 2014 at 2:49 am
B Foster
You state that the "negative impact of LNG is greater than diesel when considering the externalized costs of developing the resource"
LNG is not fracking. LNG is a storage method for Natural Gas, just as LPG is the storage method for Propane.
One can transport Nat Gas via pipeline in its vapor state, or more efficiently in its liquid state. Where it originates from is a separate issue from LNG itself. LNG can originate from traditional gas wells.
"More and more the consensus is that we simply do not know the impact of LNG exploitation" again, a misleading statement. Nat Gas does not come out of the ground in a liquid state, so your statement makes no sense. Fracking is only one way to extract Nat Gas, there are other methods.
While I am against fracking as its effects are not known, I do get tired of the misinformation out there.
Up 17 Down 4
north_of_60 on May 2, 2014 at 10:07 am
Gas wells have been drilled and brought into production using hydraulic fracturing since the 1960s. There is about half a century of hydraulic fracturing of new gas wells without problems contaminating ground water.
The only people who "do not know" are either willfully ignorant or haven't been paying attention to the facts.
It's been well documented that the 'horror story' incidents involving 'fracking' have all been in old depleted oil fields, not new gas fields.
The people making decisions based on facts and data consider these details important. Fortunately, it's intelligent people with all of the facts that make the decisions for Yukon's energy future.
Up 13 Down 16
B. Foster on May 2, 2014 at 5:06 am
@north
It is widely acknowledged that the negative impact of LNG is greater than diesel when considering the externalized costs of developing the resource. Arguably LNG may burn cleaner but at what ultimate cost?
More and more the consensus is that we simply do not know the impact of LNG exploitation. It is simple. We do not know....therefore to embrace fracking in particular we enter into territory that could have significant long term negative effects for our territory and further could wind up being our legacy to our children and theirs.
The lame argument that because we use fossil fuels up here we should embrace oil and gas interests is tired and ill considered. By that reasoning we should open up all lands nation wide to resource development. Some areas are special....the Yukon is one of them and should be preserved and protected for what it still represents, an unspoiled wildness in a world where this is rarer and rarer.
You really should consider this fully.
Up 22 Down 6
Joel on May 1, 2014 at 2:20 pm
Northern Mike, the Yukon is very far ahead in moving away from fossil fuels. And there has been a great investment in avoiding the use of fossil fuels.
There is so much false information and presumptions in the petition that it is quite useless although it is a good gesture.
My understanding of the petition is that if they use LNG instead of diesel (they NEED one or the other by law) there will automatically be fracking in the Yukon.
Since I don't see much diesel production in the Yukon after the prices have risen and we have diesel generators for almost 50 years....I don't know if I would be expecting much fracking or traditional gas extraction in the near or far future
Up 27 Down 15
north_of_60 on May 1, 2014 at 10:11 am
Nearly all plastics are made from natural gas. The inconsistency of the anti-fracking eco-philosophy erodes their credibility. Apparently it's OK to use fracking somewhere else to make plastic, and diesel fuel and gasoline and jet aircraft fuel to bring into the Yukon, but it's not OK to use any LNG in the Yukon cuz it might have come from wells that are fracked. Yeah right.
What alternatives do you suggest for generating electricity on those very cold winter mornings when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining? That's when we have to run the fossil fueled generators, and natural gas is much cleaner burning than diesel fuel.
Up 12 Down 21
B. Foster on May 1, 2014 at 9:38 am
It is my hope that the Yukon will get ahead of the curve regarding the oil and gas situation from the perspective of resource exploitation. Typically up here we're always 6 to 10 years behind the times with reference to what happens in the South. We need to stand fast and protect what we have....at least until the resource has appreciated enough to warrant exploitation...which isn't now.
Here's a recent CBC article that is timely to this story....
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/fracking-s-effect-on-water-not-properly-monitored-report-finds-1.2627709
Up 21 Down 31
NorthernMike on May 1, 2014 at 8:24 am
Does this government and most governments have any sense of urgency of transitioning us off carbon fuel. The evidence is clear as to where global warming will take us, so ignorance cannot be used as an excuse to do nothing and not invest in alternative sources.
Up 26 Down 20
bobby bitman on May 1, 2014 at 8:11 am
Nice to see a citizen who gets up and hits the pavement on behalf of the Yukon. I would agree with her assessment that many of us just do not know what the truth is, what to make of the information that is out there. I don't know what the actual facts are even though I have attended open houses and read articles. But what I do know, is that if I don't know, then we should not be proceeding until we DO know.
So, I think we need to say no to fracking for now until people feel comfortable with it, assuming that day ever comes.