Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

A LESSON LEARNED – Premier Sandy Silver addresses this morning’s breakfast audience. The government’s handling of the Yukon Teachers’ Association’s inquiries about housing is ‘no way to run a government,’ he said.

Premier quizzed on teachers’ housing

Guests at a breakfast with the premier

By Sidney Cohen on May 2, 2017

Guests at a breakfast with the premier hosted this morning by the Yukon Chamber of Commerce wanted to know what the premier is doing about the dearth of housing in the territory.

Following Sandy Silver’s remarks on the 2017-18 territorial budget, Yukon Teachers’ Association president Jill Mason asked him what concrete steps he was taking to build and improve housing for teachers in rural Yukon.

During the 2016 election campaign, Mason said, she sent a letter to all the political parties.

It asked for a plan to deal with the ongoing issue of substandard, and in some cases non-existent, housing for teachers in rural Yukon.

The Liberals responded saying they would do an assessment of the territory’s housing needs and develop a plan to address them, she said.

In March, Mason sent a follow-up letter to Silver, by then premier, and to Education Minister Tracy-Anne McPhee and the minister responsible for the Yukon Housing Corp., Pauline Frost. That letter asked what progress had been made on the housing plan for teachers.

“I didn’t receive a reply,” Mason said this morning.

She told Silver that after two meetings with with Education and the housing corporation, it was clear that “they have received no direction, they don’t know that this is a plan that you have put in place, if you have put it in place.”

The premier said he didn’t see Mason’s most recent letter – and apologized for not responding.

“That’s no way to run a government,” he said.

Silver, formerly a teacher in Dawson, acknowledged that housing is a serious issue.

The current housing corporation plan paints the whole Yukon with one brush, he said, but every community is different.

“The problems that are occurring in Faro are not the problems that are occurring in Dawson City and Haines Junction,” said Silver. “The plan is to take a look at the needs per community.”

In Silver’s view, teachers new to a community should first be offered temporary housing. Then, once they “grow roots,” they should move into permanent housing in the community.

“If you’re a teacher coming into the community, you should have housing, but not forever,” the premier said.

Once the teacher or health care worker is established, the private sector should step in with housing options, he said.

The 2017-18 budget tabled last Thursday sets aside $3.2 million for staff housing, with $2.4 million of that going toward a six-plex in Ross River, and $800,000 for repairs to existing staff housing.

Ranjit Sarin, representing the Vimy Heritage Housing Society, asked about the future of his organization’s plan to build quasi-independent seniors’ housing in Whitehorse.

“It’s been proven that if you have good nutrition, no isolation, activities, people will live a better life,” said Sarin.

In March 2016, the then-Yukon Party government gave the society $50,000 to plan for the new seniors’ home.

There isn’t money earmarked for the Vimy project in this year’s budget, conceded Silver, adding the government’s purse isn’t as full as he thought it was as the Liberals headed into office.

“We had to make some tough decisions as far as what was going in this budget and what wasn’t,” he said.

Vimy’s absence from this year’s budget doesn’t mean the project won’t go ahead in years to come, said Silver.

Mayor Dan Curtis said there are opportunities to build more housing in the Whistle Bend subdivision – if the necessary resources come through.

“I don’t think that housing is the responsibility of any one government or of any one industry, or any one business, or any one individual,” he said.

“It’s truly something that the entire community has to work towards.”

In previous years, the premier Darrell Pasloki would deliver a budget teaser at a Yukon Chamber of Commerce event ahead of tabling the year’s financial plan in the House.

Silver decided to abandon that tradition this year, “out of respect to the opposition, out of respect to the democratic process.”

“The place where that budget should be dropped originally, is in the legislative assembly,” Silver told this morning’s Gold Rush Inn audience.

In his breakfast address, Silver said this budget represents the “true cost” of running government, and noted the financial advisory panel he’s struck to deal with deficits projected for future years.

The 2017-18 budget estimates a small, $6.5-million surplus, but forecasts deficits ranging from $42.3 million to $58 million over the following three years.

This fiscal year’s proposed budget cuts the general corporate tax rate from 15 per cent to 12 per cent, and the small business tax rate from 3 per cent to 2 per cent.

These tax cuts would add up to $1.6-million in savings for Yukon businesses, said Silver.

The Liberals vowed to eliminate the small business tax altogether during the territorial campaign.

Getting rid of the tax may have been a good move politically, Silver said this morning, but that since taking office last December, he has realized it would have been unwise in terms of policy.

Chamber president Peter Turner said some of his members were disappointed to learn the Liberals aren’t nixing the small business tax, as promised.

However, he said, they were more understanding after considering the substantial deficits expected, starting in 2018-19.

“Business people understand being fiscally prudent,” he said.

Comments (11)

Up 0 Down 2

Teachers Shouldn't Get Special Treatment.... on May 8, 2017 at 10:00 pm

Housing for teachers in the Yukon is a joke!
Unlike doctors, there are a ton of teachers looking for work throughout the country, do we really need to supply them with housing?

Maybe YG should stop hiring people from "outside" that require housing, and give preference to those that are willing to purchase or rent private homes that are committed to the community and to supporting the economies of those communities.

Further, these teachers are not only getting housing, but they get it at a minimal cost. If I were to get Yukon Housing, I would be charged 1/4 of my gross pay. But teachers have to pay pennies ($600 in some cases) for entire homes! That's not
only unfair, but it does not motivate them to purchase homes in the communities as they live in and commit to the Yukon.

Up 9 Down 0

Anonymous on May 4, 2017 at 6:59 pm

Regular Joe.. Are you serious. Seniors usually mean these people are retired and living off pensions. Are you saying they should be working for the rest of their lives? Pensions are much lower than yearly income. This is an assisted living program and usually they are very expensive.

Up 11 Down 2

Hugh Mungus on May 4, 2017 at 2:32 pm

@ Atom It's not a 'seniors' facility in WB. It's extended care for people of any age unable to care for themselves.

Up 32 Down 3

Hugh Mungus on May 4, 2017 at 2:30 pm

Teachers in the Yukon are amongst the highest paid civil servants many earning well over $100K/year. They can find their own housing.

Up 20 Down 1

YukonMax on May 4, 2017 at 9:33 am

“The problems that are occurring in Faro" Oh! Didn't know Faro had housing problems. Some teachers are housed in the same YG building as the nurses. In the past 12 years, a number of houses owned by Yukon Housing have been sitting empty. Is there a problem? Really? Maybe it would be cheaper to house Ross River teachers in Faro and subsidize their commutes. Several employees at Ross River Highways and Public Works do live in Faro, in their own homes. What's good for some should be good for others as well.

Up 16 Down 6

Atom on May 3, 2017 at 8:11 pm

In respect to housing teachers in communities, the Dept might start by hiring teachers who live in that community.....not their pets or friends.
In respect to any deficit anticipated, the Liberals need to cull the bureaucracy created over the years of YP cronyism, and privatize the disaster Senior facility in Whistlebend, etc.

Up 13 Down 7

Simple on May 3, 2017 at 1:41 pm

Liberal government Federally has removed money for housing to $2 million a year.
Second the Yukon liberals have cut Yukon Housing budget by 40%.
There is no investment in housing in the Yukon except for teachers.
So homeless and disabled sleep on the streets.
Great job.

Up 14 Down 9

Regular Joe on May 3, 2017 at 12:53 pm

It is time for everyone to stop assuming that senior's housing needs to be subsidized by government. Seniors are the wealthiest, and soon to be the largest, cohort in our society. Yes, there are some poor seniors, but these folks are looked after in the current seniors social housing program (this program allows an income of over $50k - is that poor?). Seniors have wealth - even if their incomes are lower than some, and the stats show that their incomes are also pretty darn healthy compared to Canada's and Yukon's median incomes. They do not deserve, simply by virtue of their age, to have their housing subsidized by the rest of us.

Public sector builders - go ahead and develop new housing options - pull some seniors in as investors and get off the government dole.

Up 18 Down 2

Huh? on May 2, 2017 at 7:32 pm

Dear there is no money for housing.
If you are going to comment, please do so in a language that we can understand.
Thank you

Up 9 Down 7

Groucho d'North on May 2, 2017 at 5:53 pm

I recall some bold promises to improve housing from the Liberals during the election campaign of 2015. Performance has not been as advertised. Clearly our federal government's priorities are not focused on what the electorate was hoping for.

Some nostalgia from the pre-election spin: https://www.searchlock.com/search?q=Trudeau+liberal+housing+campaign+2015&slr=1&sr=omniredir-google

Up 14 Down 16

There is no money for housing on May 2, 2017 at 3:40 pm

in the Yukon. $2 million a year for housing from the Federal Government and 40% cut for Yukon Housing. Deficit is what this government, put a 7%million interest charge on the Yukon tax payers a year, plus debt payment, a year of $8.6 million a year in payment.
When you go in debt you pay it back plus interest, which in the future cut funding for future programs.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.