Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by VINCE FEDOROFF

RIVER OF NAMES – Protesters march to the legislature yesterday afternoon. The River of Names encourages the government to protect the Peel River watershed. The march was one of two protests that took place the day the government presented its new budget.

Image title

Photo by VINCE FEDOROFF

Image title

Photo by VINCE FEDOROFF

Image title

Photo by VINCE FEDOROFF

Image title

Photo by VINCE FEDOROFF

Image title

Photo by VINCE FEDOROFF

Premier launches spirited attack on CPAWS

Premier Darrell Pasloski harshly condemned the Yukon Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society's (CPAWS') work to protect wilderness areas in the territory during his 2013/2014-budget address Thursday.

By Whitehorse Star on March 22, 2013

Premier Darrell Pasloski harshly condemned the Yukon Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society's (CPAWS') work to protect wilderness areas in the territory during his 2013/2014-budget address Thursday.

It's a move the official NDP Opposition called "shocking.”

"Whatever the amount of land that the Yukon government protects in the Peel watershed region, it will never be enough to satisfy the demands of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society,” the premier told the legislature.

"CPAWS is not trying to save Yukon for Yukoners. It is trying to save Yukon from Yukoners,” he continued.

"Yukoners have to ask themselves if this is what they want.”

(See story below for CPAWS' reaction.)

"I guess we now know very, very clearly where this government stands on the Peel,” Liz Hanson, the leader of the NDP, told reporters Thursday, following the speech.

"This is a frontal attack, not only on the Peel watershed land use plan and the First Nations and Yukoners who've expressed their views on this, but largely it's a frontal attack on the environment.”

Sandy Silver, the interim leader of the Liberal party, also criticized Pasloski for his CPAWS attack, saying it has cheapened the office of the premier.

"This is a budget speech, and to use the budget speech to lash out at people that don't agree with your particular (plan for the) future of the Yukon, well, that's just really disheartening, and I thought it very odd for the premier to take that opportunity to throw that particular dart,” Silver said.

CPAWS Yukon is one of two Yukon partners in an international project to protect a 1.3-million-square-kilometre region stretching from Yellowstone National Park in Montana to the Peel watershed.

According to the premier, CPAWS' next "target for protection” includes the Wolf Lake ecosystem in south central Yukon.

"You can bet the bumper stickers are already prepared,” said the premier.

In case it wasn't clear already, "the Yukon Party, for the record, does not support the Y2Y initiative,” Pasloski told the house.

As he continued, the premier highlighted the need to find balance in the Peel plan, something he argues the Final Recommended Plan failed to achieve.

"The mineral wealth of the Peel watershed region could sustain the territory for generations to come,” he said.

"The size and value of the Crest ore deposit alone are astronomical.

"The estimated volume of iron ore in the conceptual pit, or just 15 per cent of the total estimated deposit, is 1.68 billion tonnes. Based on the five years average price of iron, this fraction of the deposit would have a market value of $139.7 billion.”

It would be "irresponsible” for the government to prevent development of these resources, he said.

"While we do not support the Y2Y projects or the CPAWS agenda of making the Peel region the northern anchor of Yellowstone to Yukon, we do support environmental protection and are committed to preserving Yukon's wilderness beauty,” the premier said.

Pasloski went on to highlight the use of Restricted Use Wilderness Areas in the government's four proposed Peel plan, and the ongoing development of a Yukon Water Strategy, which recently entered public consultation stages. He noted that 12.68 per cent of the territory's land is currently protected, second only to British Columbia.

"While Yukon's economic outlook is extremely positive, we must be cognizant that the percentage increase in our Territorial Formula Financing Agreement for subsequent years will be significantly lower than in recent years,” the premier said.

"Some of this funding pressure can be accommodated by increased revenues from the private sector due to Yukon's strong economy,” he continued.

Mining, oil and gas accounted for 23 per cent of the territory's 2011 GDP, he reminded MLAs.

Pasloski proceeded to highlight growth experienced in the mineral production and exploration fields since 2002.

"Mineral production in 2002 was sustained mainly by placer gold production, which was estimated at $25 million. In 2012, the value of mineral production is estimated to total about $450 million, up from $402 million in 2011,” he noted.

He then listed off a number of other figures to illustrate the economic contributions of the sector.

"Yukon has seen nearly $1.3 billion in exploration investment over the last 10 years,” he said.

"The decade of devolution has been good for Yukon,” Pasloski continued.

That was a reference to the territory's 10-year anniversary since the devolution agreement with Canada took effect April 1, 2003.

Comments (12)

Up 0 Down 0

shenya on Mar 25, 2013 at 7:56 am

As a Yukoner, born and raised at this very impacted area-Yes! "As a Yukoner, is this what I really want?" This is what I want. I want the government leader of the day to take the Commissioners Recommended Plan, accept and approve it and move on. You actually believe I am being led by any environmentalist groups? I believe in what my heart feels and guides my decision. Perhaps you may have children or grandchildren that may be severely affected by your cold heart decision you make today.

Quit your selfishness and listen once to the real people. You say ̨majority of people signing the Protection letters are outsiders. Think of who voted for your party come election.

Cut the stubbornness and be more agreeable to what we as Yukoners want. I once met a Hawaiian here and he told me our country is the most pristine and we are so lucky. He mentioned he no longer feels his own homeland is part of him.

Up 0 Down 0

CJ on Mar 25, 2013 at 5:16 am

"Spirited attack"? More like brutish.

The appropriate response to Pasloski's self-indulgent display is contempt. But what a shame. The fantastic thing about Yukon politics is once you realize you can slag someone publicly and shortly after run into them and their children face-to-face in the supermarket, you learn to temper your behaviour accordingly.

You might even remember that those people you're taking a public swing at used to shop at your drugstore, for instance. You might say at one time you were happy to share the same space.

Fentie moved politics in this direction, and this YP has shown no hesitation to verbally abuse their constituents, often by way of opposition MLAs.

Fortunately YP is adopting this neanderthal style just as it's going out of fashion elsewhere. Goodbye Darrell.

Up 0 Down 0

Frank Irish on Mar 25, 2013 at 4:39 am

habsfan

"What's next leg irons and public lashings?"

I think whats next will be clear orders that if Yukon Public Servants speak out about protecting the Peel or supporting Y2Y they will be disciplined and/or fired. I expect the government will see to it that Yukon gov funding is not available for some conservation groups.

I think Pasloski and Cathers will continue to undermine conservation groups. I think "undermine" is a clever word to use as mining companies have contributed to the Yukon party and they can operate in the shadows while the government protects their rights and interests. Having said that, mining is important, but so are Yukoners who voted and who want to protect a wilderness legacy in the Peel and who support wildlife and carnivores like grizzly bears thus they support the Y2Y concept.

Maybe Pasloski was just having a bad day. I sincerely wish he would man up and apologize for his inappropriate comments.

I have worked in the mining industry. I know all about toxic tailings and messes left behind. I would much rather see some special areas set aside and other protected and another Faro or Cinton Creek or...., its a long list.

Up 0 Down 0

Habsfan on Mar 25, 2013 at 3:53 am

My goodness, I thought the Yukon premier represented all Yukoners and all interests?

So if you speak out against the YP's vision for the Yukon, you suffer their wrath as part of a budget speech?

What's next leg irons and public lashings?

Up 0 Down 0

Stan Holloway on Mar 24, 2013 at 5:28 am

The following excerpt is from a Whitehorse Star news article in July 2010. Has the Paslowski government committed to provide funding to build a railway to help Chevron mine the Crest deposit?

Chevron plans to cling to ore deposit

Chevron will clean up the mess at its Crest iron leases located in a remote corner of the Peel Watershed, but the company has no intention of giving up its claim to the largest iron ore deposit in North America.

Last month, two Yukon conservation groups asked Chevron not to renew its leases in the 68,000 sq. km watershed currently embroiled in a land use planning process that has pitted mining interests against environmental concerns.

While the company intends to mop up fuel spilled at a staging area and remove 200 abandoned barrels of fuel, plans to mine the ore remain on the table, according to Dave MacInnis, vice-president of policy for Chevron Canada.

"The obvious issue is it's not easy to move the product to market and as such we're looking at a number of options on that front,” MacInnis told the Star. "And there's a number of private rail options that have been floated to move the product.”

Up 0 Down 0

Frank Irish on Mar 24, 2013 at 1:07 am

Lets change tactics here.

The government wants to demonize CPAWS and people who want to protect the Peel watershed.

Time for a senior's protest. Only people over 60 years old age. Let the Premier then try and insult our elders and prominent people in our community who want protection for special areas.

I say these people should peacefully protest and shut down the legislature. Can see the Premiers's response- "I think some from this group were only 53 to 59 years of age and they were encouraging the elders to be provocative. We can work with the elders but not the younger radicals who seem obsessed with protecting large areas in concert with southern groups funded by people from the south and the United States"

Up 0 Down 0

blackpowder on Mar 24, 2013 at 1:05 am

@nile...

a little too much "US fear" .....I'd be more worried about the YPG selling out to China

The Crest ore deposit is owned by Chevron, a US company. Chevron has owned in for more that 50 years, and has decided to close down their airstrip....why ? because its a medium / low grade ore deposit, and its not worth extracting...something that the Premier "forgot" to mention

Up 0 Down 0

John Beaver on Mar 23, 2013 at 10:33 am

The Yukon Premier is insulting First Nation people and he is trying to set Yukoners against conservation groups which have good intentions. We live here because we like wilderness and we respect the wildlife which call the Yukon home. If large areas have to be set aside for preservation, mining can occur elsewhere. Its what we want, its how we want to protect our rivers, lakes and mountains. Mining companies are not in the business of setting special areas aside or protecting areas. They represent, for the most part, southern people who want to make money from our northern resources. They see the Yukon as their resource playground, their land and their resources- it's not balanced- we live here, we spend our winters here, we pay taxes here, we pay more in electricity because mines use our public power, we pay to maintain roads chewed up by southern mining trucks, we watch southern miners take our jobs and pay taxes in BC and Alberta.

I think Paslowski should resign. He is accountable for these inappropriate statements. He drew a line in the sand and he has to accept the consequences of his behaviour.

The next rally for the Peel will involve First Nations and the conservation groups. I think we should show our displeasure and protest in the legislature. The Yukon party has not listened to us. We should exercise our democratic rights and shut down the legislature until the premier takes responsibility and resigns.

Up 0 Down 0

Nile on Mar 23, 2013 at 5:55 am

Does CPAWS not get their funding from a US organization?

The Yellowstone to Yukon plan contains an extraordinary amount of Canadian natural resources. The basis for our economy.

Who would benefit the most from locking these resources off from our economy?

The answer is the US organization that funds CPAWS. This has nothing to do with saving our nature or ecosystem. Its about securing more profit for major US companies. These organizations have figured out how to get people to do their dirty work for them under the guise of environmentalism.

Up 0 Down 0

This person is our Premier?! on Mar 22, 2013 at 1:17 pm

The value of mineral production is $450 million for 2012, eh? How much of that value stayed in the Yukon, and how much was shipped right out the door with the profits going into the pockets of investors outside of the Yukon?

50% of the people employed in the mining industry here are not residents of the Yukon, do not pay Yukon taxes and have no commitment to this territory other than their fly in, fly out jobs.

Placer miners pay royalties of 17 cents per ounce, which is approximately one ten thousandth of what the gold is worth.

Pasloski, what is this about saving the Yukon FROM Yukoners? I think half of the mining industry or more is all about saving the Yukon FROM Yukoners, for the benefit of the Chinese government, outside workers, summertime placer miners and investors from elsewhere.

Save the Yukon FOR Yukoners, by preserving the 55% of the Peel, allowing 25% open to mining immediately, and saving another 20% for Yukoners in the future to decide what they would like to do with this region, including whether they would like more mining in the area.

Right now we are just giving away the farm and we are not maximizing the benefit to Yukoners.

Saying, "No amount of protection would be enough to satisfy CPAWS" flies in the face of their call for the Peel Planning Commission's final plan to be adopted: 55%.

Pasloski is not fit to be a premier. His speech was a totally irresponsible.

Shame on you Darrel.

Up 0 Down 0

Sam Holloway on Mar 22, 2013 at 10:34 am

Can the YG biologists speak freely about the importance of the Peel watershed or why the Y2Y initiative is important?

Can they be interviewed about the international professional biologists who conceived and support Y2Y? Can they discuss Y2Y at all?

Well you guessed it. Just as the Yukon Party has taken control of the Peel Planning Commission- well they have hijacked it- they are now speaking on behalf of the professional biologists who know their stuff. There is no voice for the biologists or the animals they study and strive to protect. A Wolf lake park has been considered for many years. The surprising thing is why it never happened.

The Yukon Party voice is the voice of the mining industry. Do not get me wrong, mining is important but it is only one industry, one part of our economy. Let's know the fine details about the Crest deposit but let's plan how to minimize any impact and let's shut down the many nuisance claims in the Peel. Build a road or two or not. Plan to decommission them after billions of dollars are made? Allow no roads and fly everything in and out?

Why not plan these things instead of pandering to one industry and trying to vilify conservation groups.

The Yukon has always had a boom and bust culture. The Yukon Party has been through a boom cycle- they have not listened to fair minded Yukoners- next election- it will be a bust and Darrell Pasloski and his rat pack sidekick Brad will have to say the people have spoken as they look for new work.

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on Mar 22, 2013 at 9:59 am

Yes Pasloski, you know what's better for us but you know what's better for your pockets and the others pockets who back you far better. Any resource extraction economy is a farce, refine and build the crappy products here, at least Canada might be known for something else besides the constant BS spewing, americanized hockey, bad coffee, and a lotta snow that 90% of "Canadians" flee from and get as close to the US border as they can, but who can blame them...

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.