Photo by Whitehorse Star
Yukon Energy president Andrew Hall
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Yukon Energy president Andrew Hall
Yukon Energy is seeking public input into its proposal to build a new 20-megawatt generating plant powered by diesel, natural gas or a combination of the two.
Yukon Energy is seeking public input into its proposal to build a new 20-megawatt generating plant powered by diesel, natural gas or a combination of the two.
Members of the public can provide their feedback through an online survey, contacting Yukon Energy directly by email or by attending one of four open houses planned for Whitehorse beginning Saturday.
The Crown corporation maintains the new plant is required to meet growing demand and provide additional insurance in the case of a loss of hydro generation, low water levels, peak demand and extreme low temperatures.
Low water, for instance, is currently forcing Yukon Energy to burn natural gas in order to preserve the water in the Aishihik Lake reservoir for generation this coming winter.
Approximately 20 per cent of the grid power was being generated this morning with natural gas.
Yukon Energy has been renting portable generating units in the last two years to provide additional backup if required.
The cost of the new plant is estimated at $40 million to $70 million, depending on the solution chosen, Yukon Energy president Andrew Hall told the Star this morning.
Yukon Energy has identified five location options for the generating station:
• next to the Takhini substation on the Mayo Road;
• across the Yukon River near the Whitehorse sewage lagoon;
• at the Whitehorse landfill;
• at the existing diesel generating plant at the Whitehorse Rapids Dam; and
• across Robert Service Way from the new the LNG facility.
In addition to the options for a site selection, there also the options of what fuel to use for generation – diesel, natural gas or a combination of both.
The addition of a 20-MW plant was included in Yukon Energy’s 20-year resource plan that was updated in 2016.
Hall said officials are targeting early 2022 to have the plant up and running.
There are variables that may affect the project schedule, however, including the permitting process.
The Yukon government would also have to approve the project. Any money the public utility borrows must be applied to the $400-million cap on the territory’s borrowing limit, Hall explained.
He said officials expect to recommend a site to Yukon Energy’s board of directors this summer.
Yukon Energy is also continuing to pursue options for renewable generation, such as a hydro project at Drury Creek off the Robert Campbell Highway, Hall said.
He pointed out there are a number of proposals on the table under the new Independent Power Production policy, including the proposal by a private company to place four wind turbines on Haeckel Hill.
Yukon Energy is also waiting to hear back from Ottawa regarding its application for $10 million to assist with the purchase of a large battery storage unit that could be charged during periods of low demand and used in periods of peak demand.
Cody Reaume of the Yukon Conservation Society said today it’s disappointing to see Yukon Energy heading in the direction of a new thermal generating station.
The international panel on climate change is saying we need to reduce dependency on fossil fuels by 50 per cent by 2030, and be carbon-free by 2050, he pointed out.
Reaume said he realizes Yukon Energy is in a pinch right now to bring more generation onto the grid – but everybody knew five and 10 years ago the territory was heading toward an energy deficit.
Much more could have been done to pursue renewable options, he suggested.
Reaume said it might be wise for Yukon Energy to go with the option of renting the required generation, as it would be less expensive than buying.
Savings could be put toward renewable generation, and maybe in 20 years or so there would be enough new renewable energy to unplug the new fossil fuel plant, he suggested.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (28)
Up 0 Down 0
Politico on Jun 2, 2019 at 1:54 pm
@ Max Mack Thanks for proving my point, Cheers.
Up 8 Down 1
L.Szigety on Jun 1, 2019 at 2:20 pm
The possibility of a Liquid Fluoride Thorium nuclear reactor has always been a good one. Extremely safe and reliable form of power, and absolutely no chance of a meltdown.
Why is this not on the table?
Up 25 Down 0
Max Mack on May 30, 2019 at 11:23 pm
@Politico
What a nonsense statement: "Yukon Energy is addicted to fossil fuels."
Yukon Energy supplies the vast majority of power from hydro and would provide even more hydro if they weren't blocked at every turn by folks who are determined to turn the Yukon into a massive solar and wind farm.
Up 31 Down 2
North_of_60 on May 29, 2019 at 8:52 pm
@ Mick, If you actually look at the link you posted for current energy mix then you would see that the last time the YE grid was 100% hydro was August and September of last year. There has been a significant thermal percent every month since then.
YE could burn a lot less fossil fuel if they used the Marsh Lake dam to hold September water levels in the Southern Lakes Reservoir into the winter and spring. The infrastructure is already in place, it's 100% renewable energy and it's 5 times more efficient than wind or solar.
The only thing preventing responsible water resource management is political meddling by influential NIMBYs.
The percent of fossil fuel use on the grid isn't a technical problem; it's a political problem.
Up 14 Down 2
Casper D on May 29, 2019 at 5:21 pm
Brian
LNG and Diesel literally ARE thermal generation. Yukon Energy refuses to use the term fossil fuel but that’s what it is.
Up 25 Down 8
Miles Canyon on May 29, 2019 at 4:20 pm
We need something like a major dam. Maybe it can be sold to a First Nation through a deal involving free power to a community for 100 years.
Another option is briefcase nuclear which is so green even David Suzuki supports it.
Up 11 Down 1
Mick on May 29, 2019 at 4:17 pm
@ Gringo
Read my link. It's not my data but rather that of Yukon Energy. You don't have to like it, but it is factual.
Up 11 Down 9
Gringo on May 29, 2019 at 3:51 pm
@Mick x 2. So according to you in December we are 100% hydro......bruuuhahahahaha! We generate the most electricity when there is no demand and generate the least when there is the highest demand, thems the facts! Have you driven by the dam is November? Diesel gens going, LNG going and four semi generating vans parked in yukon energy’s lot, I guess this is what happens when it’s 100% hydro...joke of the day. Just keep turning up your green electric heat, keep those Gennies pumping.
Up 8 Down 4
Brian on May 29, 2019 at 3:20 pm
@Mick
Thanks for the link,
However your failing to consider the communities that burn Diesel. So Yukon’s energy demand is still being fed by Diesel.
If you are running almost 100% off Hydro and Thermo, why are all those generators running and LNG plant right beside making exhaust?
Maybe because their meter for the usage is the output from the station and all those running generators are fed into the system in front of the meter. I looked at that site, I now have more questions about the math that Yukon Energy is doing.
Sorry man, no apology. But thank you for the link.
Here’s one for you.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukon_Electrical_Company
It shows the communities and explains in black and white the power supply. Whitehorse isn’t The Yukon.
Up 8 Down 4
Cody on May 29, 2019 at 3:14 pm
A few people commented that renting diesels is horrendously expensive, but Yukon Energy has put out information clearly showing that renting diesels for 40 years is cheaper than building and operating an equivalent LNG power plant for 40 years.
See the numbers here: https://yukonenergy.ca/energy-in-yukon/projects-facilities/new-thermal-generation/location-options/
Up 24 Down 6
Groucho d'North on May 29, 2019 at 2:25 pm
I still vote for a little nuke steam generator.
Up 12 Down 6
Mick on May 29, 2019 at 1:54 pm
@ Brian
Have a look at the current consumption graph here. It's live. More relevant, look at the tab for the past 12 months you can see May - December we are closer to 100% Hydro. Thermal kicks in after freezeup when the water isn't moving the same volume.
https://yukonenergy.ca/energy-in-yukon/electricity-101/current-energy-consumption
I know being wrong will be difficult for you so I will accept your apology in advance.
Up 20 Down 8
Brian on May 29, 2019 at 7:40 am
Not sure who thinks 90% of your electricity comes from Hydro electric generation. When old Crow, Beaver Creek, Burwash Lansing, Destructions Bay, Pelly Crossing, Watson Lake, Upper Liard, lower post, Stewart crossing and Swift River run off Diesel Generators.
Nice try with the fake news on 90% electrical supply is Hydro electric.
Also, look at the reservoirs, all 3 Mayo, Aishihik and Marsh lake are all LOW!!! Their won’t be enough power from the Hydro electric station winter of 2019-2020 to meet Whitehorse’s demands. That’s why their renting gigantic LNG/Diesel Generators.
Time for our government to start looking at cutting waste electricity.
Like only have 1-4 lights at intersections and don’t light up entire road ways. That’s what the headlights are for on our trucks. We don’t need 1000 watt HPS bulbs assistance. I could go on how to cut energy use, but people seem scared of wood stoves and opening windows in the winter.
Up 8 Down 10
Wilf Carter on May 29, 2019 at 1:14 am
Far as long term planning goes we have multi purpose energy and a transportation system to the south. We should joint venture with Alaska BC and three provinces. First Canada is carbon neutral by a long shot. We have over 600 billion trees and it takes 100 billion or less to remove our carbon. We remove US carbon. Why do you think some spruce or pine trees look greener than others? It is because it is getting enough carbon where tree that is not so green is not getting enough carbon.
Up 19 Down 7
Wilf Carter on May 29, 2019 at 1:08 am
Interesting comments. Green energy in the long term and LNG in the short term. We have our own Narural gas use it. Pay ourselves first.
Up 34 Down 4
Yukoner on May 28, 2019 at 9:04 pm
Why the continuous bandaid approach to power.
The Yukon is blessed with many usable rivers for hydro power.
Find a central located one, build a large hydroelectric dam and cover everyone’s need for years.
It’s about time the minority nay sayers, environmental zealots, and other land control people, are told that this is the best solution to the Yukon’s long term needs.
I’m tired of the wasted time, money and bickering coming from the anti-everything crowd.
God knows we would never have our existing power plant if it was proposed today. Get over it! Build a big new plant and move on....
Up 17 Down 6
Arturs on May 28, 2019 at 4:54 pm
For logistic reasons concerning security and survivability the plant should go on the North Klondike Highway pad. What infrastructure was acquired or increased with the last rate increase because that's what the outrageous sum was for and consumers would like to know what we got for it?
Up 18 Down 5
Yukon Watchdog on May 28, 2019 at 4:20 pm
@ yay Isn't it natural gas in Eagle Plains and not diesel?
Up 9 Down 23
Mick on May 28, 2019 at 2:46 pm
@ Bingo
The vast majority of energy is from hydro electric ~90%. It's Yukon Energy that has dropped the ball here, not the neighbourhood of Whistle Bend. They could have built additional hydro capacity or even greener alternatives but the chose the worst alternative this side of coal. Diesel and LNG.
Up 35 Down 11
My Opinion on May 28, 2019 at 10:43 am
Please do not invest in more Wind turbines. The last ones lost a fortune for us and were completely unreliable. By the way they are already worn out and done. The winters here destroy them and it costs more power to keep the blades defrosted then they generate. Let alone the cost of hauling cranes out of Alberta and dragging them to the top of the mountain to service them.
No sweetheart deals for some private development to provide power at double the price we are paying now.
Everyone just say NO.
Up 33 Down 8
My Opinion on May 28, 2019 at 10:37 am
Let's get it done before we are completely out of power in the winter.
Cody Reaume of the Yukon Conservation Society says we should move more towards renewables. Well it was them and others like them that was against Hydro development as it effects the environment in the form of creating a Lake. Yukon Energy has been trying for many years.
As for us meeting some Green Targets, we are already the Greenest power in Canada by far. Almost completely Hydro. Let's keep building on that.
As for Reaume saying we should just rent the capacity. That is what we have been doing the last few winters and it is horrendously expensive, weather we use it or not, bad idea.
Up 36 Down 6
Richard Bishop on May 28, 2019 at 7:19 am
Why not build a waste incinerator that will burn waste and generate power?
Less diesel trucked up highway.
Less recycling trucked down the highway.
Yukon becomes more self sufficient, in solving it's waste and power generation issues.
Up 14 Down 14
Groucho d'North on May 28, 2019 at 1:51 am
Put it near the Whitehorse sewage lagoon - keep all the stink in one place.
Up 22 Down 5
Joey on May 27, 2019 at 6:10 pm
Excellent, make sure we add the carbon capture technology and we use fuel sourced from our own gas wells. That’s progress.
Up 35 Down 1
Bingo on May 27, 2019 at 5:41 pm
See what happens when a subdivision like whistle bend goes all “green” and solely on electric...voila more fossil fuel generation.
Up 5 Down 7
nay on May 27, 2019 at 5:25 pm
@yay:
https://factcheck.afp.com/bird-deaths-misleading-numbers-conceal-biggest-culprits
Up 42 Down 15
yay on May 27, 2019 at 3:24 pm
This is great news, finally some rational reliable powerplant proposals. My feedback would be to not build the new plant near existing facilities since reliability of the entire distribution network will improve due to not having localized single points of failure. Build for diesel - that way the amazing oil from Eagle plains get to go in direct - no refining required and supports local economy. Get it built ASAP. Cheers.
No more bird shredders (wind turbines) or solar power which only produces when we don't need it most - that is just a ponzi.
Up 22 Down 50
Politico on May 27, 2019 at 3:02 pm
Unfortunately Yukon Energy is addicted to fossil fuels. Everyone has known we were headed to this point years ago but doing something about seems to have slipped through the cracks. When are these people going to start looking at what's happening in the world and become part of the solution rather than continuing the problems.