
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Yukon MP Brendan Hanley
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Yukon MP Brendan Hanley
The federal government will spend $50,000 to support community-led efforts to study strengthening pedestrian and bicyclist safety in two local neighbourhoods along the Alaska Highway.
The federal government will spend $50,000 to support community-led efforts to study strengthening pedestrian and bicyclist safety in two local neighbourhoods along the Alaska Highway.
“This feasibility study will inform future decisions on how to increase pedestrian safety along the Alaska Highway in Whitehorse,” the government said in a statement last Friday.
“It will explore design considerations, associated costs, and the benefits the community will experience from building active transportation underpasses in two strategic locations under the highway that are safe, convenient, and accessible to people of all ages and abilities.”
The two potential underpass locations are not specified.
The Alaska Highway divides Whitehorse and creates a barrier to accessing services, community recreational facilities, schools and impacts the movements of residents of all ages, the government added.
The money will support an active transportation feasibility study undertaken by the Cycling Association of Yukon and supported by Takhini residents, the Hillcrest Community Association, and the Whitehorse Urban Cycling Coalition.
Residents of these areas lobbied aggressively for an underpass or overpass near Hillcrest when the highway was widened several years ago. The Yukon government opted not to construct one.
“Our neighbourhood sits across the Alaska Highway from a vast network of trails that are used for hiking, biking, skiing,” said Jan Horton, a Takhini resident and steering committee member.
“People risk their lives regularly to cross the highway on foot rather than get in their cars to drive to the trails. I have seen up to eight people crossing at one time.
“We need an alternative route, especially if the highway is widened in the coming years,” Horton added.
“An underpass will provide a safe crossing to the trails and contribute one small part to reducing use of cars and mitigating climate change.
“The underpass will also help provide a safe active transportation connection to isolated and under-serviced neighbourhoods,” Horton added. “The feasibility study is the first step to that end.”
The funding contributes to Canada’s National Active Transportation Strategy by supporting planning and engagement activities that will help expand networks of pathways, bike lanes, trails and pedestrian bridges, the government said.
“Our support for this feasibility study will inform the next steps to build a more connected, accessible and safe community in Whitehorse,” said Yukon MP Brendan Hanley, speaking on behalf of Dominic LeBlanc, the federal minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Infrastructure and Communities.
“I want to commend the persistence and dedication of community leaders in working towards a greener and more inclusive community.”
The $50,000 is available through the Active Transportation Fund (ATF).
Active transportation refers to the movement of people or goods powered by human activity.
It includes walking, cycling and the use of human-powered or hybrid mobility aids such as wheelchairs, scooters, e-bikes, rollerblades, snowshoes, cross-country skis, and more.
Municipal governments, local and regional governments such as service districts, and Indigenous organizations are eligible recipients.
Provinces, territories, and not-for-profit organizations are also eligible in specific circumstances.
The ATF complements Canada’s strengthened climate plan: A Healthy Environment and a Healthy Economy.
The plan commits the federal government to providing permanent federal funding for public transit in support of making clean and affordable transportation options available in every community.
“Active transportation infrastructure provides many tangible benefits, creating good middle-class jobs, growing the economy, promoting healthier lifestyles, advancing equity amongst vulnerable Canadians, cutting air and noise pollution, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions,” the government said.
“Investing in safer active transportation infrastructure is key to ensuring people of all ages and abilities can access jobs and services and connect with their communities.”
Ottawa is investing $14.9 billion over the next eight years in reliable, fast, affordable, and clean public transit.
The funding includes $3 billion per year in permanent, predictable federal public transit funding which will be available to support transit solutions beginning in 2026-27.
Since 2015, the federal government has invested over $24.8 billion in transit projects across the country, providing Canadians with cleaner and more efficient commuting options.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (11)
Up 10 Down 1
Resident on Jun 19, 2023 at 2:51 pm
Two Mile Hill/Alaska Hwy is not a fun intersection to cross on foot or on bike. I've seen B-Trains run that light on more than one occasion. Impatient left-turning vehicles can be aggressive as well. It seems like half the population views driving as a contact sport and the other half as a game of deception.
An underpass or overpass to avoid vehicle/pedestrian conflicts is probably the best option but there's likely not enough demand to warrant it at this point.
Up 4 Down 9
Other end of the telescope on Jun 19, 2023 at 1:26 pm
All the folks complaining that this would be a waste of money - have you ever considered how much money is going into needlessly widening the highway? Tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to get drivers to work a few minutes earlier.(HPW's main rationale, no joke.) And no, gas taxes don't even come close to offsetting the costs. If HPW's claimed "safety improvements" are real, this is a good place to start. Making a wider highway that increases speeds is the opposite of safety.
Up 35 Down 0
Pierre on Jun 18, 2023 at 4:49 pm
The Takhini area of concern would be a real problem due to the location that they presently use to dodge traffic. It's on a busy portion of The Alaska Highway, and it's on a corner. What I find ironic is that the people complaining can go ride a bike for 3 hrs, ski for 2 but somehow cannot go another 300 meters to the cross walk at the Intersection of Two Mile hill.
Up 18 Down 1
Yukon56 on Jun 17, 2023 at 6:08 pm
When does the trough run dry Can I get a tube to get me to work, downtown
Up 9 Down 6
Frank on Jun 16, 2023 at 6:07 pm
How many of those complaining regularly ride a bike or walk longer distances than just to your vehicle and back? How many have mobility challenges and struggle with getting around, sans vehicle?
Safe active transportation routes and options in Whitehorse have improved over the years, but we still have a long way to go.
This will help.
Up 17 Down 2
Charlie's Aunt on Jun 16, 2023 at 3:12 pm
Becoming tired of all the cash being spent on studies. Why can't cash be used to build a solution instead of blowing it into the air. Both cost money but wouldn't it be cheaper to build a pedestrian bridge or better yet, as Tater said, a pedestrian crosswalk with lights as one at Alcan & Wann used to be.
Up 21 Down 1
Nathan Living on Jun 16, 2023 at 2:26 pm
If there are two crosswalks already there, they are the cost-effective solution . There is one near the Beringia Centre and there may be one at Burns Road.
The City and RCMP should ensure safety at the crosswalks with occasional enforcement.
The real issue of course is safety. Walking or riding a bike across a crosswalk is not much of an inconvenience and it is safe if vehicles follow the rules of the road.
Whitehorse is not a safe place to drive and people on bikes have to ride defensively and they should avoid many city streets.
Up 18 Down 3
Apex Parasite on Jun 15, 2023 at 2:22 pm
Another great example of a box I would not tick off if indeed there were boxes to tick off indicating what you do not want your tax dollars spent on.
If the cyclists want a study done then they should pay for the study
Up 63 Down 6
OMMG on Jun 14, 2023 at 10:37 am
Beyond ridiculous. Didn’t your Mommas teach you to cross the road? “I have seen up to eight people crossing at one time.” OH the humanity!!! Get off your bike, push the button and ‘walk’ your bike across the road. Axe the study and spend the 50k somewhere useful. Maybe we could rescue the poor tree on the R.S. bank.
Up 52 Down 10
Dog Man on Jun 14, 2023 at 10:30 am
Oh wonderful. Feds provide some money to "study" a possible underpass. Afterwhich the Territorial Government gets the study shoved down its throat, and pressured into spending 10s of MILLIONS to build the damn thing. All for the couple cyclists who will use it...
There are MULTIPLE intersections and pedestrian crossings already through that corridor. We need to spend money on this like we need a hole in the head.
Up 45 Down 5
TATER on Jun 13, 2023 at 5:16 pm
So would a crosswalk with lights.