Whitehorse Daily Star

Planes' interception cooked up as diversion, MP Bagnell believes

A pair of Russian bombers intercepted by Canadian fighters 120 nautical miles from Canadian airspace Tuesday heated up debate over the $16-billion purchase of Lockheed-Martin F-35 stealth jets.

By Jason Unrau on August 26, 2010

A pair of Russian bombers intercepted by Canadian fighters 120 nautical miles from Canadian airspace Tuesday heated up debate over the $16-billion purchase of Lockheed-Martin F-35 stealth jets.

While the incident provided Prime Minister Stephen Harper a chance to plug the 65 new war planes, Yukon MP Larry Bagnell went on the attack, criticizing the purchase and accusing Harper of damaging relations with Russia.

A statement from the PMO issued Tuesday provided details of the aerial encounter between two CF-18 Hornets, scrambled from Cold Lake, Alta. to meet two Russian TU-95 Bears, that, "At their closest point ... were 30 nautical miles from Canadian soil.”

The Hornets shadowed the Russian bombers until they turned around, according to the statement.

It also lauded the CF-18s, adding, "That proud tradition will continue after (their retirement) as the new, highly capable and technologically advanced F-35 comes into service.”

"And when you are a pilot staring down Russian long range bombers, that's an important fact to remember.”

According to NORAD – a joint U.S./Canadian military organization responsible for defending aerospace and maritime regions of both countries – Russian planes routinely probe Canadian airspace.

Such activity has ramped up since 2007 and last year there were 16 similar incidents; however, the TU-95s' proximity to Inuvik on Tuesday, where Harper's annual Arctic tour stopped in for a visit on Wednesday, was difficult to ignore.

But at a press conference Wednesday in Ottawa, where Bagnell, the Liberals' northern affairs critic, was expected to criticize the government's Arctic sovereignty policy during the PM's northern jaunt, the Yukon MP waded into what he believes was a trumped-up international incident.

"The Russian flights have been going on for a long time and then, all of a sudden, on a day when they needed a diversion, the prime minister and the Minister of Defence (Peter MacKay) created a caustic international relations uproar by chastising the Russians,” Bagnell told journalists assembled on Parliament Hill.

He also dismissed one reporter's suggestion that the flight-plan of the TU-95s was more than mere coincidence.

"When the military plan these flights, no matter what country they are in, it takes a lot of preparation and bureaucracy and administration, and they have a schedule set out to do these routine flights that Russia has been doing for years,” said Bagnell.

"Given that the prime minister didn't tell you (the media) even until recently exactly where he was going and when, hopefully the Russians didn't know.”

The race among Arctic nations to lay claim to offshore territory is currently on.

Canada is embroiled in disputes with Denmark (Hans Island) and the United States (Beaufort Sea) over land and offshore boundaries.

The U.S. also disputes Canada's claim to the fabled Northwest Passage – a web of waterways inside Canada's Arctic archipelago that could provide an alternate shipping route between Europe and Asia.

Adding to the drama in August 2007, the Russians planted a flag on the floor of the Arctic Ocean at the North Pole in attempts to bolster its claim to the region as Moscow insists the Arctic seabed and Siberia are connected by a continental shelf.

When Harper took office in 2006, he made Arctic sovereignty a key plank in his government's policy and has visited the Arctic each year since then.

But the prime minister's promises for a deep water port of Nanisivik, the site of a former zinc mine on Baffin Island in Nunavut, as well as three armed icebreakers to patrol Cana-dian Arctic waters, have yet to materialize.

Bagnell, on the other hand, wants the Conservative government to focus its sovereignty efforts less on military initiatives and more on improving the quality of life for northern residents – particularly addressing the high cost of living in such remote regions.

Harper's northern tour will end in Whitehorse, where his plane was to land this afternoon.

The prime minister is scheduled to attend a reception organized by the Yukon Conservative Association at 5:00 this afternoon at the High Country Inn.

Tomorrow, he is expected to make an announcement, but further details were unavailable at press time this afternoon.

Comments (6)

Up 0 Down 0

Mongo on Sep 1, 2010 at 7:39 am

YukonPete, you're confused.

Larry won't vote in support of OR against the registry.

Essentially a cinder block sitting in the House of Commons would be as effective as Bagnell.

....and I'm a card carrying Liberal.

Up 0 Down 0

Yukonpete on Aug 31, 2010 at 12:29 pm

Philip Combs said " I think this ridiculous statement by Larry Bagnell is his ‘diversion' to get peoples mind off the fact that he will not vote for his electorate (Yukoners) on the long gun bill registry cancellation motion."

Well I'm a Yukoner and I support the long gun registry! So larry is supporting his electorate!

Up 0 Down 0

philip combs on Aug 30, 2010 at 1:57 am

I think this ridiculous statement by Larry Bagnell is his 'diversion' to get peoples mind off the fact that he will not vote for his electorate (Yukoners) on the long gun bill registry cancellation motion. He must be grasping for any straws available at the moment to divert attention from the fact that he and his party are stabbing us in the back once again.

It was nice of Iggy to come to the Yukon and tell us in not so many words that he doesn't give a ---- what we want and he's going to whip his little puppy Bagnell to vote against northerners wishes on this bill.

Way to go Larry, way to go liberals!

Up 0 Down 0

francias pillman on Aug 28, 2010 at 7:46 pm

Who cares what bagnell says. He is a weak person who can't stand on his 2 feet and stick up for the people who voted him in. All he does is take orders from iggy. The dumpster behind my house is of more value to society than what he does.

Up 0 Down 0

DG on Aug 27, 2010 at 10:52 am

So what do people want us to use, single engine pipers and cessna's to intercept Bombers? We need new fighters to replace aging fighters.

Up 0 Down 0

Yukonpete on Aug 26, 2010 at 1:49 pm

The Russians have been flying Tupolev Tu-95 ( AKA Bears ) over the Artic to test out Norad's response times since the start of the cold war. The cold war might be over but the Russians still play cat and mouse. NORAD's website said it's aircraft had intercepted 16 Russian bombers flights over the Artic in 2009. Arctic sovereignty has nothing to do with the flights as they have been going on since 1952. Harper just likes to make up BS like usual!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.