Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Energy, Mines and Resources Minister Ranj Pillai and NDP Leader Kate White

Plan doesn’t consider mining emissions: NDP leader

In the week after the Yukon government released its plan to slash greenhouse gases in the next decade,

By Gabrielle Plonka on November 21, 2019

In the week after the Yukon government released its plan to slash greenhouse gases in the next decade, NDP Leader Kate White is questioning how mining emissions will affect the territory’s ambitious goals.

She noted Wednesday the plan doesn’t account for emissions caused by mines in the planning stages. For example, the proposed Casino mining project anticipates an annual output of 716 kilotonnes of CO2 at the peak of operation, she pointed out.

“Not only would this more than double Yukon’s 2017 non-mining emissions, it would amount to 2.7 times the 264 kilotonnes that the government is trying to cut by 2030,” White told the legislature.

“Can the minister confirm that, even if all of the objectives set out in the draft climate action plan are achieved, Yukon’s overall emissions could still rise should the planned mines go online in the next few years?”

Energy, Mines and Resources Minister Ranj Pillai noted that the Casino project, which is still in the proposal stage, has not yet entered an environmental assessment.

The mine, however, could be a major driver of copper, which is a necessary resource in the creation of a green economy, he said.

Copper is used for clean and emerging technologies such as solar cells and electric vehicles. As well, it’s one of the few materials that do not degrade in the recycling process, according to Natural Resources Canada.

Pillai said it will be important to work with industry in the creation of commodities that bolster the global green economy.

He pointed out that the climate strategy is a draft.

“We believe that we are going in the right direction,” he said. “I think that our prerogative has been that the mining sector is important, it has to be done in an environmental way, and we have to respect the community that we all live in.”

Pillai pointed out the Minto Mine operates on the grid. As a result, it uses clean energy, as evidence that there are ways to balance good environmental practices while supporting the industry.

He told media after question period that his department is “committed to start a process” toward a clean future.

The key, he said, will be to find balance.

“Yukon met its targets a number of years ago and they met their targets because all mining stopped, so you’re essentially in a position where because of this drop in the economy you meet your targets,” Pillai said. “I don’t think that’s really where we want to be.”

Pillai said he is interested in consulting with other governments to gauge the appropriate intensity for extraction, particularly copper extraction.

He envisions a future where the Yukon is able to provide a supply of copper to the global movement toward electrification.

He added that assessing the future environmental impact of a fluctuating mining ecosystem is challenging, due to the high number of variables and shallow pool of available information.

“I think everybody would have wanted to have stronger data,” Pillai said. “But when we go back and look at what was in place, the data we used was the best possible data.”

Speaking to reporters, White agreed it will be important to work with the mining industry in the future, but said she would like to see a higher return for the territory.

“Wouldn’t it be great if Yukon got paid for the non-renewable resources being pulled out of the ground?” she said.

“I think that should be part of the conversation. It’s not that I’m saying that mining shouldn’t happen in the territory, but I think we should be honest about the cost of mining.”

She suggested an increase in royalties could provide the territory with funding to invest in renewable projects.

“We are the lowest in North America, we are probably the lowest in developed countries,” she said of the Yukon’s royalty structure.

In the Yukon’s Placer Mining Act, the royalty paid from mines to the government is set at 2 1/2 per cent.

The cost of gold, however, is capped at $15 per ounce, simultaneously capping royalties at just below four cents an ounce. The price cap is an antique piece of legislation dating back to 1906.

As of Thursday, the price of gold was listed at $1,944 per ounce, or 129 times the capped rate.

In 2019, Yukon mines produced 75,228 ounces of gold.

At $15 per ounce, the government yielded approximately $28,210 in royalties.

Two and a half per cent at the current price of gold would have yielded $3.7 million.

Comments (11)

Up 2 Down 0

Apex Parasite on Nov 26, 2019 at 4:52 pm

Amazing how often external factors are left out to improve optics.

Up 11 Down 22

spot on Nov 24, 2019 at 1:06 pm

Very happy to see reporting that spells out the SCAM that placer miners are contributing through royalties. They are NOT. It is wholesale thievery and it is stunning that this regime has never been changed. Why are politicians so cowardly when it comes to the placer miners?! Pay your part, or get out. Actually, just get out. That would work too. Enough of selling our riparian zones to any takers for 4 cents an ounce or any other amount of money.

Up 15 Down 0

Jonathan Colby on Nov 22, 2019 at 6:16 pm

I was referring to mining. Thanks for using that bg brn to accurately discern what I was talking about.

What I am saying is, if you want to create an accounting of emissions, and you leave out industry and air travel, that will skew your results to the point of being meaningless. Just as any business would be lost if it made decisions while ignoring its larger clients... or its largest suppliers.

Whatever point you're making, you failed.

Up 32 Down 4

brian on Nov 22, 2019 at 2:35 pm

3.7 million more in royalties compared to the billion+ we get yearly for our budget is a drop in the bucket. Placer miners spend locally whenever they can. I'd rather the money go to local businesses than the government but that is just my opinion. It's this kind of thinking that will never get the NDP elected.

Up 23 Down 4

Juniper Jackson on Nov 22, 2019 at 2:27 pm

Every body talks about this like carbon is a real thing..it isn't..it just..isn't.. It is ONLY about the money. ALL the money raised in the carbon fraud goes into general revenue. It is not even a dedicated fund. Planes? ooops.. here some 'off set' money..we'll go pollute.. mines? oooops.. here's some off set money..we'll go pollute.. regular gas cars? oh oh..well.. you have to pay more in off set costs, but..there's the gas station.. it's ONLY about the money..a mine comes in here, and the government dickers for a 10 million dollar deposit against reclaiming the land IF the mine pollutes it.. the mine makes 500 million dollars, or more.. pulls up and leaves us with a 200 million clean up bill, our local businesses out any credit, the last payroll bounces..but hello? We got 10 million dollars so they could do that!!!

The carbon fraud has done one thing.. I think our world needs to be cleaned up, and the carbon fraud has brought that out..almost everyone recycles now.. there is the odd? I don't know what to call someone that throws their TV, computers, fridges, over the side of a cliff.. when seen they should be reported and HEAVILY fined..very heavy. It's still a huge surprise to me, that people believe giving money to the UN to build a coal plant in China will save the environment. Money will never save the environment. Only the people will do that.

Up 4 Down 17

At home in the Yukon on Nov 22, 2019 at 12:56 pm

"Any emissions accounting that leaves out air travel and industry is meaningless."
Um, first, mining is industry.
Second, we need an attitude similar to that of spending money -- every little bit counts. Blaming others, when we can each make improvements to our own carbon footprint is counterproductive. Learn the art of self-change, join the conversation at fixclimatechange.ca

Up 6 Down 13

At home in the Yukon on Nov 22, 2019 at 12:26 pm

From https://casinomining.com/project/, they will have a 150 MW LNG power plant. How much of the CO2 is accounted for this power generation? Are there ways to green out this power generation: wind, solar, hydro etc.?

Up 33 Down 1

Jonathan Colby on Nov 22, 2019 at 8:44 am

Any emissions accounting that leaves out air travel and industry is meaningless. Whatever else it is, nothing useful can be done with it. It's just a shiny prop for wannabe progressive action.

If you aren't going to do better, than just don't be deceptive about it. Mercy!

Up 36 Down 8

Adam Smith on Nov 21, 2019 at 8:14 pm

I believe Miners pay income tax, GST, payroll taxes, carbon tax, WCB, remediation costs etc. Wouldn’t be great if we actually appreciated those that are already contributing to the economy?

Up 28 Down 2

b on Nov 21, 2019 at 5:28 pm

And the government wonders why very few take them seriously. I agree, complete joke.

Up 52 Down 2

It also doesn't consider the aviation industry on Nov 21, 2019 at 4:05 pm

WestJet, AirNorth, Air Canada, and every single helicopter and airplane; all not considered.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.