Photo by Whitehorse Star
Terry Chandler
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Terry Chandler
Redfern Resources Ltd. is being forced to lay off construction workers at its Tulsequah Chief project because of a hold-up with a federal permit, says the company's president.
Redfern Resources Ltd. is being forced to lay off construction workers at its Tulsequah Chief project because of a hold-up with a federal permit, says the company's president.
Terry Chandler said Wednesday the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) has for several months had all the material it requires to review the application for a 200-metre causeway, but hasn't yet gotten around to issuing the authorization.
Three weeks ago, the DFO was informed layoffs would soon be necessary if the permit wasn't issued, Chandler told the Star from the company's head office in Vancouver.
"We have had a pretty good relationship with them, but they have been as slow as molasses," he said. "We should have had this permit in September."
Chandler said there are no outstanding issues or information voids holding up the authorization. Everything required for a full assessment of the application has been provided, he said.
As a result of no permit, he said, Redfern is looking at laying off between 20 and 30 of the 85 people working at the Tulsequah Chief site, located 100 kilometres south of Atlin, B.C., near the confluence of the Taku and Tulsequah rivers.
The area was once a thriving mining district, with initial exploration and production dating back to the early 1920s.
Redfern has been moving ahead with plans to revitalize the Tulsequah mine, which had a brief production life in the 1950s.
The company is proposing to barge mineral concentrate down the Taku River and over to Juneau for shipment to smelters overseas.
It is seeking authorization to build a causeway to connect two sections of road running from the Tulsequah Chief mine site to the barge landing.
"As soon as we have permission to do the work, we can do the work," Chandler said.
It's not financially feasible to have the 20 or 30 workers sit idle at the site, nor would it be their preference, he added.
While the layoffs are pending, the company announced Wednesday it has completed a financial arrangement which secures the remaining $200 million needed to complete construction.
Chandler said Redfern is shooting to be in production by the end of next year.
Also outstanding is the authorization for barging the concentrate year-round, though the process of obtaining the necessary permits is well underway, Chandler said.
Redfern has been advancing the Tulsequah Chief project since the early 1990s.
Its initial proposal to construct a 160-kilometre road from Atlin to the mine site created significant opposition from the Taku River Tlingit First Nation.
The decision to switch to air cushion, all-weather barges to haul the concentrate was made in 2006.
The company expects to employ about 200 people during production.
Chandler said if the company had not completed the initial financial arrangements in July 2007, he doubts it would be in a position today to secure the necessary funding, given the turbulent market conditions.
Junior mining companies, and companies which are not yet in production and do not have their own cash flow, are being hurt the most by the crash, and have had to take drastic measures to conserve money, Chandler said.
The DFO was contacted for a response to Chandler's suggestion that the slowness of its in-house process is responsible for the layoffs.
No response was received.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (4)
Up 0 Down 0
Francias Pillman on Oct 23, 2008 at 11:33 am
Sorry, I don't have to. All mining companys are about one thing, MONEY. Theres no borders in that my friend. Sorry I hurt your mining feelings. And sorry if I care about a future for my children. If you don't understand what I'm saying, I'll draw you a little map. I HAVE NO RESPECT FOR ECO-TERRORISTS.
Up 0 Down 0
Harold Moffatt on Oct 22, 2008 at 8:54 am
Francia Pillman. Before you send out your boo hoo's, perhaps you should learn to read a map. The "useless mining company" will be doing nothing to YOUR Yukon. They are a British Columbia Based company doing business in British Columbia get your facts straight.
Up 0 Down 0
Francia Pillman on Oct 20, 2008 at 12:40 pm
Boo hoo. Just another useless mining company that destroys our Yukon, then claims bankruptcy, we know how it all goes. Maybe they need to have more delays like this, so outside intrests will go elsewhere.
Up 0 Down 0
Barb Harris on Oct 17, 2008 at 1:11 pm
I cannot believe the patience that Terry Chandler has shown over the many years of this ordeal. Even now, nearly 20 years into the project, he remains calm and reasonable and very much a 'gentleman' in the face of stupendous, bureaucratic idiocy.
I took his problem, as chair of the Northern Forum of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, to the FCM before the year 2000. His problem then, after having jumped through all and any imaginable environmental hoops, was that some organization wanted to wait on a review of the International Joint Commission. The IJC is a trans-border commission which reviews projects that may have an impact on waterways that are shared by both Canada and the US. At that time, incidentally, the Redfern mine had no impact on any joint waterways. But also at that time the IJC was proposing to expand its mandate to include the waterways stretching up into the centre of the provinces and almost all of the Yukons watershed. If it had been successful in that expansion, it would have effectively shut down all farming in the prairie provinces - hog, cattle and grain - and all mineral development and mining in BC and Yukon. It most likely would have shut down most of industrial Ontario and Quebec as well. I am not an economist, but that sure didn't look good to me.
It was for those reasons that I was able to get it on the table at FCM. That is, it was applicable to a great percentage of the country. The motion that I took to FCM was to cancel the IJC review and it was passed unanimously at the board table.
I didn't run in the 2000 municipal election and lost track of what happened with that motion and the IJC review, but I have been taking note of how Terry Chandler's project has been proceeding. VERY SLOWLY! And I can't understand why! His proposal was going to clean up an ongoing environmental mess, create jobs and create wealth for Northern BC and the Yukon. There really was no downside.
And now, nearly 20 years later, Terry Chandler is waiting on yet another hoop to jump through. The man has the patience of Job. Let's hope he is not asked to sacrifice his first born son to finally make it work.