Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

BAD-LUCK BRIDGE – Just as the city was preparing a tender for repairs to the Sumanik Drive bridge after it was struck by a transport truck in 2017, it was hit again this past July by a waste management truck with its lift up.

Pedestrian bridge’s days are numbered

The city is moving forward with the project to remove the pedestrian bridge over Sumanik Drive and explore options for a temporary replacement.

By Chuck Tobin on September 26, 2019

The city is moving forward with the project to remove the pedestrian bridge over Sumanik Drive and explore options for a temporary replacement.

City council approved the required budget amendment at its meeting Monday evening.

The pedestrian bridge is used by cross country skiers and hikers to access the trail network from the Mount McIntyre Recreation Centre, though it’s not the only access.

Just as the city was preparing a tender for repairs to the bridge after it was struck by a transport truck in 2017, it was hit again in July by a waste management truck with its lift up.

It’s been closed to the public since.

An engineering assessment has recommended the bridge be removed before the snow arrives. The additional weight could lead to more concerns about the integrity of the structure and the risk to the public.

There is no word yet on when the city intends to issue a tender for the bridge’s removal.

Whitehorse ski club manager Ben Poudou said Wednesday if a temporary solution is not found, there are other ways to get to the trail network from the recreation centre. Those include the tunnel under Sumanik Drive.

“Definitely, the bridge is the most convenient way, but we have other ways,” he said.

Poudou pointed out Arctic Winter Games officials don’t even use the bridge to conduct their cross country ski races.

July’s collision was the third in four years.

The city had prepared a budget of $198,000 to repair the bridge before the most recent collision.

Of that, $128,000 was coming from federal gas tax money and $70,000 from an insurance payment.

The federal funding, however, is not available for the demolition work.

Council voted Monday to allocate the $128,000 from capital reserve funds.

It’s expected a portion of the funding from capital reserves will be reimbursed through an insurance claim.

Comments (7)

Up 0 Down 0

Michael Miller on Oct 3, 2019 at 12:36 am

Think the city has 2 bailey bridges. Why not take this one down just put another up in the spring and of course make it a little higher.

Up 21 Down 1

Nicky on Sep 28, 2019 at 4:22 pm

This is a ww2 Bailey Bridge; it can easily be dismantled, repaired and re-installed, and any costs passed on to the company that damaged it.
While the bridge is being repaired they can re-grade the approaches to raise the bridge a meter.
It's too bad the incompetents running the CoW can't grasp this or effectively communicate with the taxpayers who pay their wages and benefits.

Up 10 Down 1

insurance? on Sep 27, 2019 at 12:28 pm

BnR...that's what insurance is for--accidents. This might have been a careless mistake that caused the accident but it was still an accident.

Up 8 Down 4

Mr M on Sep 27, 2019 at 9:18 am

The Liberals are giving away lots of money before the election maybe they can give some more.

Up 15 Down 3

BnR on Sep 26, 2019 at 7:00 pm

For Gods sake insurance? Read the article.
“......it was hit again in July by a waste management truck with its lift up”
Lift. Up.

Up 29 Down 0

Max Mack on Sep 26, 2019 at 3:00 pm

And what would it cost to replace the existing bridge, perhaps lifting it somewhat to avoid the drivers who don't seem capable of driving to height restrictions?

This council has no problem slapping down about $70 million dollars for a "public safety building" and related infrastructure, another $XX million for a new fire hall downtown, another $XX million for a new transit hub downtown, over $3 million for a new skateboard park, etc, etc, etc, not counting the extra O&M that will come with these outlandish capital projects.

Come up with a reasonable estimate to replace the bridge. Oh yeah, train your drivers.

Up 29 Down 1

insurance? on Sep 26, 2019 at 2:12 pm

Maybe there is more to this, but why isn't insurance covering the repair--either the City's or the disposal company's? I'm wondering if the bridge isn't legal height to start with? Or maybe it was when it was built but isn't anymore?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.